Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council Tax Band's - Check n Challenge System


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5897 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The following is a News Release from Martin Lewis of Money Saving Expert: Consumer Revenge - Credit Cards, Shopping, Bank Charges, Cheap Flights and more

 

 

News Release. Monday 25 February 2008

 

Council tax bands check ‘n’ challenge system

 

Huge numbers have already reclaimed £1,000s due to misbanding.

 

The recent press discovery of a cover up over council tax bands is further evidence that hundreds of thousands could get cash back by following MoneySavingExpert.com’s check ‘n’ challenge system. Since the campaign was launched in February 2007, over 3 million people have tried the system and the website is overloaded with success stories, including some who’ve got over £4,000 back.

 

By checking your band, it’s not just the current band that can be lowered, but a backdated payout to the date you moved in.

 

Why people can get so much back

 

Money Saving Expert Martin Lewis, the creator of consumer revenge website MoneySavingExpert.com, came up with the cashback system. He explains:

 

“The amount you pay in council tax depends on which band you’re in. In England and Scotland, the bands depend on the 1991 valuation of house price values. Yet these didn’t involve someone coming to your home; many were ‘second gear valuations’, so called because estate agents would literally drive past houses and allocate a band. We’re still reliant on the same system meaning there are more holes than Swiss cheese."

 

“Many people are living in incorrectly banded houses, and with the internet it’s now possible to check and challenge your band for free, possibly winning a backdated payment from 1993, when the system started, worth £1,000s.”

 

Why people should reclaim NOW

 

Lewis is urging people to act now. He says: “The closer we get to a

revaluation, the more institutionally difficult it will be for someone to get their own house rebanded. Already if you’ve been in a property more than six months, you have to force a rebanding, and as we progress towards a national rebanding it could mean many miss out reclaiming the £1,000s they’ve overpaid.”

 

Money Saving Experts three step banding ‘check and challenge’

 

Step 1: Check your banding compared to your neighbours’.

 

Go to Valuation Office Agency - homepage (England and Wales) or Scottish Assessors Association* (Scotland), which allow you to check your council tax band and the band of any of your neighbours in similar houses for free (bands range from A to H, with H being more expensive houses). It’s very easy to do, and the results can be startling. If there looks to be a discrepancy, ie you’re in a higher band than neighbours in a similar property, you may have a case.

 

Step 2: Work out your house price at 1991 levels.

 

If there’s a chance you’re in the wrong band, to check, you bizarrely need to work out what your house was worth in 1991, because that’s how council tax bands are allocated. To do this, go to Council Tax Rebanding: Lower your band and save £1,000s... where you can find out, for free, all the homes in your street’s recent sale prices. Next, follow the instructions on how to use web house price inflation calculators to quickly calculate the 1991 price. Finally, compare this to the 1991 bands listed; if it looks like you should be a lower band, you’re in action.

 

Step 3: Challenge your band.

 

If both the above steps show you’re in the wrong band, then you can challenge it. However, remember that if you ask to be rebanded it is possible your band will be increased, not decreased. If you moved into the property in the last six months, it’s easy to ask your council to look at the banding. If not, even if it refuses to consider it, you can still push hard by writing and saying “I believe the council tax list is erroneous, and you have a duty to maintain its accuracy”. For full details on this go to Council Tax Rebanding: Lower your band and save £1,000s...

 

How widespread are the payments likely to be?

 

Martin Lewis, creator of MoneySavingExpert.com comments, “The success reports are constantly flowing in, as people work through the system and get their money. If you’re moved to a lower band, you get a backdated payout, for as long as you’ve been in the property, this means in most cases £1,000 to £5,000.”

 

“Therefore the clarion call is simple: everybody, everybody, everybody should take the ten minutes it takes to check if they’re in the right band.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5897 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...