Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see the poops are still trying to deflect from their own criminality and and abuses by whinging on about raynors buying her council house - now about election registration - anyone who owns a flat or house understands that you dont give up your and your childrens home just because of a new relationship and while we are on about that ..   lets start with When is jenrick being revisited for both lockdown abuses and self admitted (claims estate is his main home - not the property in his electorate or his london property) - and electoral registration abuses as he claimed he was at his estate 'main home' away from both London and his electoral 'home'  - much of which paid for by the taxpayer   Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick 'breaks lockdown rules twice' by going to 'second home' - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Key Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick drove 150 miles to his 'second home' after urging the nation to remain in their homes in a bid to...   ... perhaps follow with more self admitted lobbying while in a potion where they shouldn't “A few of us in parliament have lobbied the government – and with the help of the Treasury select committee, the chancellor has listened,” John Baron wrote.   Tory MP faces lobbying questions over Treasury committee role | Investing | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Co-owner of investment management firm called for ‘urgent’ post-Brexit changes to City rules at committee meetings     About time labour got in the game and started pressing for these self admitted/bragged Tory abuses were properly investigates.
    • No I didn't I got the dates mixed up.   
    • Sorry about that, TJ. The person who posted it specifically said it was free access. Here's another version of the FT article. https://archive.is/KYrPa
    • Isnt there some indication in there of at least intent to inform arbuthnot? IF he wasn't then it would seem to be Vennells decision to keep him 'uninformed .. Although seems to me if arbuthnot was unaware - he was either incompetent or should have very detailed records of denials. Seems vennells is constantly at the core of all the lying about all these issues though.
    • Paywalled/subscribe HB I'm unaware of the details on this HB but why is it a potential taxpayer burden? Hasn't a judge already ruled port has rights of access - so shouldn't costs be on the private company (South Tees Development Corporation) trying to change established access?     LIVE: High Court updates as CEO gives evidence in access rights row between STDC and PD Ports - Teesside Live WWW.GAZETTELIVE.CO.UK The face-off between the Teesport operator and Mayor Ben Houchen's South Tees Development Corporation continues in the High Court  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Default notice from nationwide and kpr


bilco105
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4332 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Folks,

 

Today I received a default notice from nationwide, followed by a threatening bully-boy tactics phonecall from KPR which has me extremely on edge.

 

I have an outstanding overdraft of £2400, which I havn't made payment on since november (Seeing as my last payment was over £1000) and 99% of the remaining amount is a flood of bank charges.

 

However, I fear I've left it too late to start challenging the bank and disputing the charges, since KPR contacted me today acting on behalf of Nationwide.

 

I sent a request for statements, along with a £10 cheque a while ago. However, I did not send it proof of delivery and therefore have no proof it has been received. I plan to send another tommorow, recorded delivery, along with another cheque. Have I left it too late?

 

KPR called me and used there bully boy tactics to make me agree to paying back £400 a month, but I am not in a financial state where I can afford to do this.

 

What advice can you give me regarding this? I really want to dispute the amount I'm being charged, but I don't want the default to go on my file. (KPR have said I wont be defaulted if I keep up with the payments they offered me over the phone).

 

I've done some reading now and realise it was stupid of me to deal with this over the phone.

 

What should I do now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, i am in the same situation as you.Tell them the account is in dispute and that you are going to put a claim in court, that you have sent a S.A.R.S request and are still waiting for the information.They have 40 days in which to get it to you. KPR are apart of Nationwide group.Get everything in writting so you can use it in court.If they default you, you can add this to your claim, requesting that they remove it.Dont let them worry you, just keep focused and you will get it sorted in the end.Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

KPR is the Nationwide 'In-House' DCA...;)

 

Nationwide have had a history during the past year of trying to harass Penalty Charges Re-claimants, by seeming to accelerate the debt collecting process, whilst a Claimant is going through the Re-claiming process.

 

IMHO...I would continue to seek your unlawfully debited Penalty Charges + NOT worry too unduly about KPR's tactics + threat of a DEFAULT NOTICE being placed on your Credit Report.

 

Firstly, I would seek out a 'parachute' current account at a Bank elsewhere + transfer any Credits that U may have regulary coming in into the NEW current account.

This will STOP any 'freeze' on your Flexaccount, if U were to miss any repayment of your O/D, causing U temporary financial difficulty.

 

Secondly, an O/D is subject to Sect 10 of the CCA 1974 + requires a different approach to a DEFAULT NOTICE REMOVAL etc compared to other forms of 'alleged' Debt, which U may read about on other Threads on this website.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/31515-ccas-overdrafts.html

 

Even IF a U get a DEFAULT NOTICE for your 'alleged' O/D Debt, when U issue your Penalty Charges Claim at Court, U can insist that it is removed/expunged from your Credit Report, as part of your Claim.

...This is especially so, if most of the 'alleged' Debt is made up from unlawful Penalty Charges etc.

 

Thirdly, I would keep tabs on your Credit Report held by ALL the CRA's + certainly view a copy of it BEFORE U File your Claim at Court!...;)

 

Here is a link to a recent Nationwide Thread which may be of interest to U...

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/nationwide/125820-nationwide-want-overdraft-back.html

 

 

...:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

KPR are the in-house collections department for the Nationwide.

 

If you still have the letter sent from KPR, Look at the very bottom of the letter and in small print it says,

 

KPR Debt Collection is a business name of Nationwide Building Society, whose principle office is at Nationwide House, Pipers Way, Swindon SN38 1NW

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Sorry to hijack this thread but I cannot start my own post for some reason but it is to do with KPR/Nationwide.

I'm sure I can't do anything about his now, but just wanted some advise. I have been banking with nationwide for a number of years and have been paying KPR a fixed amount regularly for 2 years on a credit card that I could not afford to pay the full amount on. All was fine until I was recently made redundant and therefore had quite a bit of money deposited into my account. Within days KPR froze my bank account and would not release my money until I fully paid off the debt with them, even though I explained that I needed the redundancy money to live until until I found a job. They basically said i either paid it immediately or they would take it off me in 14 days anyway basically leaving me no choice but to pay it so that I could access other monies in my account. Is what they did legal, do I have any comeback on them? I basically may find myself in default of my priority debtors now as I no longer have any money in which to keep my monthly payments up. Any advise would be appreciated, even if it is to say they were in the rights to do this. I made it very clear that I wanted the call to be recorded and that under no circumstances was I in a financial position to pay them this money but that they had left me no choice. I have the address, date, time and name of person I spoke to at KPR so I can request a copy of the tape if there is anything I can do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hijack this thread but I cannot start my own post for some reason but it is to do with KPR/Nationwide.

I'm sure I can't do anything about his now, but just wanted some advise. I have been banking with nationwide for a number of years and have been paying KPR a fixed amount regularly for 2 years on a credit card that I could not afford to pay the full amount on. All was fine until I was recently made redundant and therefore had quite a bit of money deposited into my account. Within days KPR froze my bank account and would not release my money until I fully paid off the debt with them, even though I explained that I needed the redundancy money to live until until I found a job. They basically said i either paid it immediately or they would take it off me in 14 days anyway basically leaving me no choice but to pay it so that I could access other monies in my account. Is what they did legal, do I have any comeback on them? I basically may find myself in default of my priority debtors now as I no longer have any money in which to keep my monthly payments up. Any advise would be appreciated, even if it is to say they were in the rights to do this. I made it very clear that I wanted the call to be recorded and that under no circumstances was I in a financial position to pay them this money but that they had left me no choice. I have the address, date, time and name of person I spoke to at KPR so I can request a copy of the tape if there is anything I can do.

 

Firstly its always better to start your own thread, you will generally find that you will get more responses.

 

If you are not already aware KPR are the in-house debt collectors for the nationwide.

Banks have a clause written in the agreement called the right of set-off, where they can take money from one account to pay off a debt in another account held with the same bank. In these circumstances it is always better to open a bank account with another provider not linked to the bank you have debt with often refered to here as a Parachute account.

 

Did you negotiate a reduced payment arrangement with kpr/nationwide do you have proof of this arrangement in writting. If so then the bank have acted unfairly by taking your redundancy payment as you have a re-payment plan in operation and this should take precedent over their right to set-off.

 

You need to take a look at B.C.O.B.S and read a few of the posts on here. Then write to kpr/nationwide Inform them to the hardship this has placed you under and refer them to their obligations under B.C.O.B.S and request that they return your money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...