Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • How much of the documentation have you seen from when probate was obtained? And do you have a copy of the original will? I can't remember. My thought about you making the decision on your own to go with another lawyer is that three of you are meant to be beneficiaries of this will trust, aren't you? Normally you would need to act together. HB
    • Octopus allows you to pay by variable Direct Debit, so you pay only for what you use but still benefit from DD pricing. That's what I've done ever we were SOLRed over to them in July 2022.
    • Hi guys, I am about to file my defence via email as cannot log in to the claim anymore.  Can you please advise if I can paste below and if it's good to go for now, or should I add anything else in?  Thanks!  The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4.  The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.  1.  The Defendant is the recorded keeper of vehicle xxxx xxx.  2.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant - Parking Eye LTD.  3.  As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.   4.  In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant.  5.  The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer.   6.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.
    • Getting onto the ladder: The first-time buyer conundrumView the full article
    • Ooops - one to many also s..... my draft reply should read as:  Thank you for your response Mr Schnur  I set out my position quite clearly in my letter of claim and nothing has changed. Your insurance requirement is unlawful and is contrary to section 57 of the Consumer Rights Act, and also section 72 of the same statute. I would also refer you to the outcomes in PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729).  My deadline for action - 1 May 2024 - still stands, and if P2G wish to avoid the addition of court costs and interest to my claim, you may wish to respond positively before that date.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NU - Arrogant and dismissive attitude coupled with poor advice.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5917 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Long story short:

Bought a motor policy from a NU call centre in India - had it not been the cheapest would never have bothered as the telephone experience was painful. Had eight years NCD at the time (with AA).

 

Last Autumn Mrs Ladles scratched the offside in a car park and I called NU for advice. Was told that we could have 2 'no fault claims' in a five year period so no probs. Booked the car in for repair there and then, all done on the telephone.

 

Currently going to renew the policy and have been told that we only have three years NCD (not nine) - this is 'because we have had a fault claim and have therefore lost 2 years of our NCD and when we took the policy out NU only give a maximum of five years NCD.

 

We have been given two pieces of bad advice - firstly the call centre should have offered us a protected no claims bonus when we bought the policy (I wasn't even aware of such a thing until this month) as we had accumulated so many years. This is an issue but not the salient point.

 

Secondly - I realise that if I had read the policy from cover to cover I would have realised that we would have sacrificed a huge amount of NCD, but surely the whole process of having a call centre is geared towards providing accurate advice for matters of this nature and as a customer surely I have a right to expect to be given correct advice.

 

Because the call handler couldn't be bothered to check our policy when handling the claim we were given the wrong advice and whoever we choose to insure with now will only provide 3 years no claims discount.

 

I have tried to raise the issue with NU and havbe been pushed from department to department in a process which seems deliberately tailored to try to make people simply give up. I have been informed by a junior complaint handler that they will look into the matter and listen to the recording of the telephone call but regardless of their findings will not change their desicion to reinstate my NCD.

 

I WANT TO ESCALATE THIS ISSUE AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL WITH NU AND THE OMBUDSMAN, DOES ANYONE KNOW SOMEBODY I CAN CONTACT WITHIN NU WHO WILL TAKE OWNERSHIP OF THIS ISSUE WITHOUT HAVING TO FOLLOW A CUMBERSOME COMPLAINTS PROCESS WHICH IS DESTINED TO REACH A DEAD END?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya,

 

Firstly The NUD complaints proccess is outlined in the policy booklet ( if you want to write in) and via my experiance this should not reach a "dead end"

 

It seems that you may have started the process anyway, what you need to do now is follow this up with the customer relations department.

 

To get this resolved a little quicker you could either email [email protected] - you can also find a "complaints form" on the main NU internet site

 

or call the switchboard 01603 622200 - they may be able to transfer you straight to a complaint handler ( in the Customer relation dept )

 

Advise you wish to make a complaint about a NUD Motor policy as you feel you were miss-sold,

 

all the above ways should get you through to a dedicated complaints handler who can investigate and listen to the calls ( usually a lot quicker then the general call centre staff)

 

Protected NCB is something that should be explained and offered at quote stage. However if you had a quote in writing first before taking out the insurance then it may not be relevant anyway as the onus would then be on you to read through the quote.

 

As for you point about losing your 8 years ncd, this unfortunatly is correct, the maximum NCB is 5 years however this is in line with most other direct insurers.

 

let me know via this thread how you get on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Aviva Support

ladles

 

Firstly, my apologies that you have been given misleading information.

 

If you want to send the details directly to myself ([email protected]) I can get this investigated for you, I am on the forum in order to help with these things.

 

Just to clarify, both sets of information you have been given are correct, this is just another way.

 

Becca

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...