Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fine for not Displaying Tax Disc


Filthy Monkey
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5926 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

 

My Dad received a fine today for not displaying his tax disc. He received a new tax disc yesterday, after waiting almost three weeks for it to arrive from the DVLA and, in fact, it was in the car. However, he damaged the tax disc holder yesterday when removing the old disc, so the new disk was just left on the dash and had fallen off. Has anyone had any experience of contesting these fines? Is it worth doing so? Obviously a simple check with the DVLA will show that the tax was paid for and valid.

 

Thanks in advance for any advice

 

FM

Link to post
Share on other sites

The law does state that an offence is committed for not displaying the disc....

 

33.—(1) A person is guilty of an offence if—

 

(a) he uses, or keeps, on a public road a vehicle in respect of

which vehicle excise duty is chargeable, and

 

(b) there is not fixed to and exhibited on the vehicle in the

manner prescribed by regulations made by the Secretary of State a

licence for, or in respect of, the vehicle which is for the time being

in force.

 

However, it may still be possible to avoid the fine if the circumstances are explained - I certainly don't think it would be appropriate to issue the fine if what you describe is an accurate description of events. Unfortunately my view will not be enough... :D

 

Good luck - hopefully someone who has contested in this manner will read your plight and offer guidance.

 

p.s. Does your father have any breakdown or insurance policy that offers free legal advice for motoring related matters? Worth a call if he does...

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the downside (as if there aren't enough) I believe this is a "strict liability" offence which - in the simplest of terms - means that not being at fault or not knowing is not a valid defence.

 

Let's hope you find someone who has experienced the same...

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

However, it may still be possible to avoid the fine if the circumstances are explained - I certainly don't think it would be appropriate to issue the fine if what you describe is an accurate description of events. Unfortunately my view will not be enough... :D

 

Well, that's good enough for me. You'll get my vote if you ever run for PM... :p

 

p.s. Does your father have any breakdown or insurance policy that offers free legal advice for motoring related matters? Worth a call if he does...

 

I'm not sure. I'll check with him and see. The trouble is, he's in Glasgow, I work in London and I'm heading to Canada for a couple of weeks tomorrow. I know that if I leave it with him, he'll just pay the fine. Oh well, maybe it will teach him to be more careful in future... :rolleyes:

 

Thanks for your input, guys. If anyone else can offer anything on this, I'd appreciate your thoughts...

Link to post
Share on other sites

The section quoted above relates to 2 distinct offences.

 

1) Failure to have VED for a vehicle on the public highway. Which does not apply as he had the tax disc, but not on the windscreen.

 

2) Failure to display a valid VED disk. That there is valid VED is immaterial; the disk must be displayed and fixed to the vehicle. If the disk was resting on the top of the dash and visible through the windscreen then a penalty for this is over-zealous, but factually correct as the disk was not fixed, the fact that it fell off is testament to this. It had fallen off, so it wasn't on display at all, then there is no argument - the penalty is valid. The broken disk holder is irrelevant - the disk could have been sellotaped to the screen temporarily.

 

I'm afraid to say that he will have to pay it. If you send your defence/miitigation as you have outlined here, you are simply admitting the offence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid to say that he will have to pay it. If you send your defence/miitigation as you have outlined here, you are simply admitting the offence.

 

Thanks for the comments, Pat. All valid points, just, I suppose, one of those things that you don't think about. Not to worry, it's only money... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Tell you what.

Our Director didnt renew the company pool car tax discs and printed out the renewals for us to put in the windows! We told him to shove it obviously.

 

Even if its been paid online. Your Tax disc is the actual receipt of payment. Thats why you get your reminder a good few weeks before expiry. Theres no excuse for missing it. It could have been worse in this case. The car could have been taken away to the crusher!

I totally sympathise with your situation but its best to just pay the fine in this case and at least have a mini roll of selotape in your glove compartment for next time! ;)

Black Horse LTD 2008 - Default removed upon CCA request. Unable to supply original agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest 10110001

A longshot:

 

The DVLA is a civil authority (and not a millitary one), the Bill of Rights 1689 - unrepealed - legislates freedom from fines and forfeitures without trial.

 

Have you asked the DVLA to revoke the fine? The RTA does not provision the DVLA to subvert a point of law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...