Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
    • did you submit your directions
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car Keys replacement


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5940 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My house was broken into before xmas and the cars keys were stolen, amongst other things. Luckily, they didn't steal my car, just the keys. As appropriate I rang the insurance to pick up the cars (incase the thief returned) and arranged for locks to be changed.

 

However the insurance wants me to pay 1/2 the cost of replacing the locks. There is no details about this in my policy document. The insurer's repairer has told me to look into this too. In his words it is 'naughty' and he has not come across this before.

 

When I rang the insurance to ask where this was included in my policy, the only answer was "it was in their discretion on how to deal with claims, that part". I looked at the policy document and its definately not in there.

 

I will have to pay something to get my car back in the first instance and then follow with a complaint to Tesco insurance and then to the Financial ombusdman.

 

Any advice out there?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

This isn't something I've come across either but I don't usually deal with claims as I'm in CSD.

I'll check out our policy wording tomorrow for you and post back as soon as i find out what's going on.

 

DA

If you find the advice I give is useful, then please feel free to click the scales :)

 

"It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt" :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds to me to be rather typical spin to reduce paying out what is rightfully due to you. I am currently looking at the viability of taking my insurer to small claims court over another situation where the insurer is arguing what I believe to be a fallacious strategy that clearly is aimed at cheating me out of an insured claim.

 

I think they probably do this in untold numbers of cases simply because in a large number of them people swallow their story or can't be bothered to fight.

 

Fight the b*st*rds I say.

 

Shoestring

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a quick chat with a colleague on our claims team, she said that obviously without looking at the policy she cant comment on this specific case, but generally speaking she cant she any reason why we would ask a customer to pay half towards the damage.

The only deduction you might have is your policy XS so its possible that this is being deducted from the claim and its just coincidence that it works out to be half of the pay out.

Have a look through your motor insurance schedule, that will confirm what your policy XS's are and you'll know where you stand.

 

DA

If you find the advice I give is useful, then please feel free to click the scales :)

 

"It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt" :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi, we went through the same thing when our house was broken into, the theifs nicked Julie's keys to her car. She called her car insurance who told her it would not be covered on her policy and that because they we taken from the house, that it would come under your household insurance policy. We had such problems with our home insurance company at the time which was the Woolwich, in the end I got Julie to deal with it. So she took over, in her first phone call to them, this was on the second day of trying to get things sorted, she told them that either started to get things replaced or that she was going to make a complaint about them. within half an hour we had a sup on the phone telling us to goto comet to pick up our new tv and video, we had our sky replaced a day later and they also paid for the locks to be changed on Julie's car.

 

Hope this helps it should be claimed on under your house insurance, if they don't play ball, threaten to goto the insurance ombudsman,that normally gets them into gear.

If what we say helps you, then please tip the scales.:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I rang the insurance to ask where this was included in my policy, the only answer was "it was in their discretion on how to deal with claims, that part".
Fee-fi-fo-fum, I smell some insurer's bull. :rolleyes:

 

It is not "at their discretion", it is what it says on the paperwork.

Ask them to put this in writing, and tell them you want them to say in the letter if this is their final decision, as you will then proceed to the FOS for adjudication in the matter.

 

I am not a betting woman, but I wouldn't be surprised if they backtracked really quickly rather than commit themselves to that statement in writing and have it taken to the Ombudsman. :razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for all your advice. Haven't progressed this yet. Still waiting for my car to be repaired. Audi do not seem to have door locks for an Audi A4 for the last 3 weeks anywhere in the country and don't know when they'll have some more. Gotta sort out the franchised dealer 1st before I get onto the insurance company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Foolish, as I said before when they nicked my car keys and I only had one set to the car.

 

My house insurance paid out, because at the time they were taken they were in the house and as my car insurance company said at the time, They should be covered by your household insurance under your personal items cover, our household insurance is always all singing all dancing, and they replaced my keys. You didn't lose them outside in the street, they were taken from your house, so you claim under your household insurance.

 

I know this, because I had to do it 8years ago.And it took my local Fiat dealer 3 three weeks to get the right set of locks for my car. So I now how you feel.

If what we say helps you, then please tip the scales.:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The part about 'it's our discretion how we deal with claim' is completely irrelevant. I mean, an insurer could use that little gem to get out of or impose 'special' terms to EVERY claim!!

 

Read your policy and I think you'll find that this part of the wording relates to whether they write your vehicle off, repair it or pay you in cash the cost of repairs. It is not an open quote which they can use on a whim to explain every decision they make.

 

Call them back, request to speak to someone higher. Then complain. Tell them you will go to the FOS. Don't make empty threats; if they try fobbing you off and don't pay the other 50%, go to the FOS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...