Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • a chargeback via a paypal account used in an ebay sale doesn't usually result in funds being sucked from your bank account,  just that you attain a paypal negative balance. as you saying the money was taken by paypal from your bank account without you authorising this? or is it directly the buyers name that is shown? regarding the chargeback but either way you bank account HAS been debited? dx  
    • what solicitor is the PAPLOC from? then just search xxxx snotty letter dx  
    • moved to the debt self help forum. plenty of like threads here to read along with the ones you've done so far..good work. last thing you ever want to do is look at any kind of IVO/BK or anything alike concerning consumer debt, never do that, turns unsecured debts into secured ones in many instances. your best bet for now is p'haps looks at  Options for dealing with your debts: Breathing Space (Debt Respite Scheme) - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) sadly you have to go thru one of the free debt charities to invoke that but DON'T be tempted to also open up a DMP with them, just get the Breathing Space done. get that in place that gives you at leasy 60 days buffer you've also goto to realise you'll probably get a default once breathing space is in place, bit if not it might pay you to withhold payments even after BS then p'haps re start payments once a DN for each debt is issued and registered. at least that way, whatever happens in 6yrs the debt will drop off dx  
    • Hello, I am a private seller and recently sold a pair of trainers on eBay.  Everything seemed fine until just after the eBay 30 day mbg had expired.  The buyer contacted me with photos showing me that both shoes had ripped.  He wanted his money back, and after refusing to refund him, he then left me retaliatory and defamatory feedback on my profile to the effect that I had sold him fake trainers (this was removed by eBay).  He then initiated a chargeback via Paypal.  Invariably, the outcome was in his favour, and I have now been charged for the cost of the trainers.  I would have also been stung for the chargeback fee, but eBay refunded this.  Incidentally, I do have the email receipt of the trainers from when I bought them from a well-established and bona fide online retailer.  The susbequent conversation with eBay followed its predictable course, i.e. the chargeback is out of their hands etc. I have been in contact with citizens advice, and my bank.  Citizens advice told me that as a private seller I'm responsible for the "Title and description" of the goods, but not the performance, or the fitness for purpose.  To me it is clear; if you receive something that's not as described, you don't then use the goods, and more than 30 days later claim 'not as described'.  In my mind, this makes the claim fraudulent.  He's used the 'they're fake' card to give credence to a 'not as described' claim here, obviously, without any evidence.  My understanding is that the chargeback is unlawful, because the trainers were shipped as described.  However, I read something on an eBay forum regarding sellers having no statutory rights, i.e. no right to appeal against a chargeback decision, or to complain to the financial ombudsman.  Does this mean that if my bank disputes the charge on my behalf, it will be to no avail, even if it's recognisably a fraudulent chargeback?  I have reported it via the Action fraud website. Any advice, anyone?  Would be most grateful!
    • Thank you, I have drafted my letters and started to complete the reply form, printed from this site and not using the one they provided.    2 questions, on the forum link it says to tick box D & I, the reason for box D will be given on my thread, what would my answer be to "I dispute the debt"?  Do I send anything for the Vodafone debt they have included?  I've only done 118 loan s. 77 & capital one credit cards so. 78    Thank you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

'Zero Hours Contract' and Holiday Pay Entitlement???


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5538 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello and a big thank you to all for bothering to uphold such a resourceful website.

 

I have recently requested holiday pay from my employer only to be told that I was not entitled to it as I am working under a 'zero hours contract'. Its a food service position and I don't remember signing any contract when I began working for the business but I work full time hours.

 

Can anyone give me the official line on where I stand as regards my entitlement to 'holiday pay' under such a 'contract'???

 

Hope you can help,

 

Mary S

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there & welcome to CAG.

 

To be honest I've never heard of a Zero Hours Contract! However, every employee is entitled to holiday pay - even if they do not have fixed hours or work the same hours every week. Your employer should take an average of your hours over the previous 12 weeks and that will be your holiday pay entitlement.

 

You should also have been issued with your terms and conditions of employment i.e. hours and rate of pay etc, within 2 months of starting the job.

 

You might find the following line useful:

 

Holiday entitlements: taking your holidays : Directgov - Employment

 

and I would point your employer in that direction as well!!

 

Please let me know how you progress.

 

Kind Regards

 

Ell-enn

 

PS I have asked for your thread to be moved to the Employment Section

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zero hours contracts are fairly common. My wife is a Home Care Worker and has one. It basically means that the employer is not obliged to give you work and in turn you are under no obligation to do the jobs requested. It suits her (our) family situation. She actually works around 30 hours per week, but can throw back a particular job if it doesn't fit what she is doing, or can take time off at relatively short notice to cover childcare etc. Different employers use them in different ways - in my wife's case reasonably sensibly, but in the past unscrupulous employers used it as a means by which they only paid for work actually done. For example, a restaurant might employ three staff and not know how busy a particular night was going to be. He would therefore have the three staff 'on call' in a rest room unpaid until it got busy enough to bring them out to serve.

 

Your employer is absolutely wrong to deny you holiday though. Your rights are exactly the same as everybody else's and you must be permitted paid holiday on the basis of the last 12 weeks' work. Whether an 'employee' or a 'worker' (naturally if you are self employed that is different!), this builds from the first day that you start work. Presumably the person you work for pays you and deducts tax and National Insurance? You need not have a formal Contract, but should be provided with a written statement of particulars within 8 weeks of starting. This should set out the basis on which you are working. Terms of your contract may be 'implied' if not specified in writing, therefore although your contract might not specify the number of hours which you work, it may be customary that you do a certain number each week. Implied terms are every bit as important as written ones in most respects.

 

Quite how you approach the subject again is another matter. I would ask again and tell your employer that you have taken advice on the subject of holiday as you couldn't understand why you didn't qualify. Ask why specifically he doesn't think that you qualify, and ask for this in writing if needs be. Providing that you have worked sufficiently to calculate an average working week, you should know what you are entitled to.

 

My wife's company operate on the basis of x hours holiday for every x hours worked, so it is quite easy to keep tabs on.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some companies include holiday pay in the hourly rate for zero hour contracts but this should be included in your contract if thats the case. I am not sure if its legal but I used to be in that situation with a very large company working for a local council so theres a good chance it would be legal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some companies include holiday pay in the hourly rate for zero hour contracts but this should be included in your contract if thats the case. I am not sure if its legal but I used to be in that situation with a very large company working for a local council so theres a good chance it would be legal.

 

It's been illegal since 2002 (I think that's the right date)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some companies include holiday pay in the hourly rate for zero hour contracts but this should be included in your contract if thats the case. I am not sure if its legal but I used to be in that situation with a very large company working for a local council so theres a good chance it would be legal.

 

I think that this is considered as 'rolled up pay' which was deemed unlawful in 2006. The rulling determined that holiday pay has to be paid at the time the leave is taken, not aggregated throughout the year.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there & welcome to CAG.

 

To be honest I've never heard of a Zero Hours Contract!

 

Ellen, its basically a fudge, designed to show that (should a future issue occur) the employer can prove there is no mutuality of obligation. Chances are this is a contract for services rather than a contract of employment (on paper at least).

 

This is (in my view) a good example of where a tribunal would imply that there is another employment contract, where the commercial reality is that x hours per week are worked.

 

To Albert - can you check your payslips/documentation, and see whether there is anything in there about whether holiday pay is included with the hourly rate. As others have said, this is illegal now, but many employers still do it (notably agencies).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Slightly off topic, but only slightly.

 

My sister-in-law is a student with a part-time job at a clothes shop on a zero hours contract.

 

The company have now taken to some pretty strange tactics to get rid of her. Firstly, they cited the lack of one of her references (despite never mentioning it to her before saying she would have to leave).

 

Secondly, they contacted her to say that they would have to let her go because of the credit crunch (nice easy words to throw around!) so would she mind writing a letter of resignation.

 

Does anyone know where she stands in all this? I presume as it is a zero hour contract they are not obliged to give her any work, but cannot understand why they are actively seeking her resignation.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Secondly, they contacted her to say that they would have to let her go because of the credit crunch (nice easy words to throw around!) so would she mind writing a letter of resignation.

 

she should tell them to go forth and multiply in a series of short jerky movments if they want her to resign.

 

if she writes a letter of resignation then she is considered to be giving her job up, if they want to sack her they will have to do it themselves, not get her to do it for them.

 

Does anyone know where she stands in all this? I presume as it is a zero hour contract they are not obliged to give her any work, but cannot understand why they are actively seeking her resignation.

 

Cheers

 

how long has she worked there?

 

a "zero hour" contract usually means that someone is employed on an "as and when" basis, so they have no set working hours, but instead are offered work when it comes up, which they are normally entitled to refuse if they arent able to work those hours.

For example, if she is a student and they offer her 2 hours work which clashes with a class/lecture, then she is perfectly ok to refuse the work.

 

The employer cannot demand a resignation, if she is still wanting to work but they want rid of her, then they have the following options:-

 

1) Redundancy

If her position is surplus to company requirements, they could begin redundancy proceedings

 

2) Dismissal due to gross misconduct or some other disciplinary reason.

If she has done anything which constitutes a sackable offence (theft, not coming into work, not doing her job properly etc), then once the disciplinary proceedure has run its course they could sack her if its warranted

 

Of course, if she hasnt completed at least 12 months service then they are allowed to simply end her employment there without reason, which is pretty crap but allowed nontheless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The right to paid leave comes under the Working Time Regulations. It applies to virtually everyone apart from the self employed, or those working as limited companies. I believe the WTR are enforced by the Health & Safety Executive. Another good website to look at.

 

Also giving payment instead of paid leave is illegal. Payment can only be given if someone leaves employment and has accrued holiday but not taken it.

 

Rolled up pay was made illegal some time ago.

My opinions are not expressed as an agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. My advice is given freely but please remember to always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star below.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...