Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Better version attached with the late appeal explained more clearly for the judge. This will sound silly, but I think it would be a good idea to e-mail it to the court and UKPC on Sunday.  It's probably me being daft, but Sunday is still March, and as it's late, sending it in March rather than April will make it sound like it was less late than it really is.  if you get my drift. You can still pop in a paper version on Tuesday if you want. E-mail address for the court: [email protected] And for UKPC: [email protected]   [email protected] Defendant WS.pdf
    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

When is a debt statute barred?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3278 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It does depand but normally it is,

 

when last payment was made,

when you last acknowledged a letter buy writing back to them,

or after a CCJ or other means of enforcement that you have acknowledged.

 

The 6 years in England start then but in Scotland it is 5 years from the above.

 

Chrissi

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does depand but normally it is,

 

when last payment was made,

when you last acknowledged a letter buy writing back to them,

or after a CCJ or other means of enforcement that you have acknowledged.

 

The 6 years in England start then but in Scotland it is 5 years from the above.

 

Chrissi

 

A CCJ is never extinguished, but after 6 years (5 Scotland) they can only enforce by a further successful application to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does depand but normally it is,

 

when last payment was made,

when you last acknowledged a letter buy writing back to them,

or after a CCJ or other means of enforcement that you have acknowledged.

 

The 6 years in England start then but in Scotland it is 5 years from the above.

 

Chrissi

 

Well ... I believe that it is 5 years for statute barred in Scotland UNLESS there is a CCJ. But not after this. Look at page 2 of this. If they have a CCJ it's 20 years.

 

http://www.bdl.org.uk/images/Prescrition%20and%20Limitation%20(Scotland)%20Act.pdf

 

At least that's how I read this - am I wrong?

Any help and advice is offered in good faith, based solely on my own knowledge and on experience gathered from this site. I am not qualified to offer legal or financial advice, which you should seek from an expert before making any important decisions. My opinions are therefore offered without liability.

 

If I've been helpful, please click my scales. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well - we need Rory here - as I'm not sure - and, as you know I'm English but live in Scotland and have done for many years. And my understanding is that, once there is a CCJ, it does not go away. So it's 5 years till it's stat barred (that's what the paragraph above refers to), but 20 years once there is a CCJ.

 

I don't read anything in this as having anything to do with the CCA.

Any help and advice is offered in good faith, based solely on my own knowledge and on experience gathered from this site. I am not qualified to offer legal or financial advice, which you should seek from an expert before making any important decisions. My opinions are therefore offered without liability.

 

If I've been helpful, please click my scales. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

A decree is the Scottish equivalent of a CCJ. Our laws on enforcement are slightly different though. If you have a decree granted against someone owing you money you have up to 20 years to start enforcing the decree. Whether the debt is covered by the CCA or not is irrelevant. CCJ's (as far as a know) do not ever go away but after 6 years of not enforcing the CCJ you would need to apply to the court for re-enforcement of the CCJ and have a valid reason why you have not previously enforced it.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, that's my homework for tomorrow. As I'm pretty sure, and I think this factsheet makes it clear.

 

But I'll go and check it out for myself.

 

:)

 

Anyway -hijack over.

 

 

I understand that a debt becomes statute barred after 6 years but when does the 6 year period start.

Is it from the last payment made, the last letter received or the date it goes into dispute?

 

From the last written acknowledgement by you, as Michael said.

 

:)

Any help and advice is offered in good faith, based solely on my own knowledge and on experience gathered from this site. I am not qualified to offer legal or financial advice, which you should seek from an expert before making any important decisions. My opinions are therefore offered without liability.

 

If I've been helpful, please click my scales. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

And to you too Aktiv :)

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again rory - and happy christmas to all of you (was typing my answer as rory posted- as ever, he's quicker than me)

Any help and advice is offered in good faith, based solely on my own knowledge and on experience gathered from this site. I am not qualified to offer legal or financial advice, which you should seek from an expert before making any important decisions. My opinions are therefore offered without liability.

 

If I've been helpful, please click my scales. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

What happens if you never make a single payment or make any kind of written acknowledgement , does that mean the statute barred clock has never began to tick and that it is an enforceable debt even decades later if you never made at least one initial payment ( or acknowledgement) ?

 

Or can signing the cca be construed as written acknowledgment of the debt and dated from there ?

 

If it is dated from the date of the cause of action , what happens if no default is ever registered , you can defend by data protection laws rather than limitations act ?

 

What reason have ever been found valid in court for a re-inforcement of a ccj after 6 years ? I can imagine if you went into hiding and were no longer contactable could be used as a valid reason , but are there any others ? Could a creditor say for example that it was not economical to pursue the ccj whilst the debtor had no assets, but now 10 years later he has inherited a sizeable estate and we want a charging order placed upon that ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i am guessing that as a result of you never making payment then the debt is SB from 6 years after first payment due.

 

You dont sign CCA requests with your handwritten signature.

You just type or use a digital signature.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 years ia 6 years they cant get any type of order/CCJ if the debt is over 6 years

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 years ia 6 years they cant get any type of order/CCJ if the debt is over 6 years

 

Not quite true, if a action is brought against a statute barred debt and the action is not defended then the court can award judgment by default

 

once this occurs you have an uphill struggle to get a CCJ set aside IMHO

Link to post
Share on other sites

What happens if you never make a single payment or make any kind of written acknowledgement , does that mean the statute barred clock has never began to tick and that it is an enforceable debt even decades later if you never made at least one initial payment ( or acknowledgement) ?

The limitation period will start on the demand for payment, or when the debt becomes due.

 

Or can signing the cca be construed as written acknowledgment of the debt and dated from there ?

Um... well, normally, the signing of the CCA will occur before the first payment becomes due, and so will not be the start of any limitation period.

 

If it is dated from the date of the cause of action , what happens if no default is ever registered , you can defend by data protection laws rather than limitations act ?

This is irrelevant, see above. the cause of action will be the first time they could default you, the fact they chose not to is effectively irrelevant.

 

 

What reason have ever been found valid in court for a re-inforcement of a ccj after 6 years ?

 

There is a difference between reinforcement of a CCJ and original judgement. A CCJ is never spent, and the court could enforce it at their discretion even after 6 years has passed, although no further judgement may be awarded based on the CCJ after that time.

 

they would need to show valid reason it took so long. all the reasons you state might be valid reasons to ask for permission, but the court would consider all factors.

 

I can imagine if you went into hiding and were no longer contactable could be used as a valid reason , but are there any others ? Could a creditor say for example that it was not economical to pursue the ccj whilst the debtor had no assets, but now 10 years later he has inherited a sizeable estate and we want a charging order placed upon that ?

 

Do you already have a CCJ?

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was going on the fact that u would defend the action so they would not be able to get a CCJ.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was going on the fact that u would defend the action so they would not be able to get a CCJ.

 

Ah yeah, while you know that the problem is from the person looking in's point of view, if someone sees that comment

 

6 years ia 6 years they cant get any type of order/CCJ if the debt is over 6 years

 

then the problem is that it could be construed as being the case that once a debt is six years old you dont need to do anything as a court cant issue a judgment. which is wrong , you always need to defend a court action

 

i saw a case just a day ago on here where the person did not defend because they thought there was no chance of getting a CCJ as the debt was statute barred and luckily they have now filed a defence but we are not sure if it will be accepted as they may be out of time

 

this is why i corrected what you said

Link to post
Share on other sites

It should also be noted that in cases of fraud, mistake, or concealment the limitation period may not run until the fraud, mistake, or concealment could reasonably have been discovered.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tom.

 

based on what u have just said if u go out of the country on work for say 10 years and then come back and find somebody has used your name to gain credit then the limitations act does not apply.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tom.

 

based on what u have just said if u go out of the country on work for say 10 years and then come back and find somebody has used your name to gain credit then the limitations act does not apply.

 

im not sure i understand what you are asking,

 

Toms' comment was aimed at the issues surrounding the Limitation Act, now what he was saying was, if you move and try to conceal your new address then the limitation period may start from when the creditor finds out where you have moved to or reasonably could have determined your new address

 

if someone does as you suggest, if you were not in the country and could prove you were subject of id theft then you would not be liable anyway

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...