Thread: DG Solictors. Need Help

Right had my statements now come through today and added the charges up which come to £2860.50. I am enjoying having something to give me a challenge especially for these kind of ammounts but even now i am chasing up things like £80 and even £25. Questions though is can someone please tell me where they say Card Missue £10 can i claim for these as they are under the OFTs £12 charge??? Need to know as i have to take these out of this figure if i cannot claim for these ones. What gets me aswell though is for the card missue that sometimes they charge me £10 and sometimes they charged me £30 lol. Wonder what the difference was as to £10 one time and £30 another? Also while anyone is reading this, anyone know who to start sending the prelim letter to?
Thanks for any advice.

Similar Threads:

• LLoyds bank solictors
• Abbey Solictors Letter
• Hfc's Lawyers ( Dg Solictors)have Bungled The Case

The OFT figure is irrelevant in this context. For one thing it was given as a maximum, and even then they said it would be up to the bank to justify it. They have charged you £10 - almost certainly this was done automatically, without anyone doing anything.

For the bank to justify this charge they must provide evidence that it has cost them £10 because of your action in misusing your card. If they don't provide that evidence then it is an unlawful charge.

Send the prelim either to your local branch, or head office.

Ok DG Solicitors have contacted me today offering me a full refund with the confidentiality written in which if i go ahead will be crossing out. What i want to know though is that i got a default against my name on this account and wanted this removed. There is no mention of this on the letter and was wondering what people think i should do? Will they remove the default? will the get shirty if i ask for that to be removed aswell? or shall i just accept the payment.?

This is what i had written to the Courts while i filed.

Claimant had an account with the defendant over 6 years,which is run on their standard
terms and conditions.The claimant is claiming £2860.50 taken by the defendant
in the way of charges for last 6 years and removal of a default on the account.The
bank's charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable as they
are contrary to common law. Further,as a disproportionate penalty they are invalid
under the Unfair(Contracts)Terms Act 1977 s.4 and the Unfair Terms in Consumer
Contracts Regulations 1999.Para.8 and sch.2 (1)(e).In the event that the charges are
not a penalty then they are unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply of Goods
and Services Act 1982 s.15 The bank was asked to justify their charges but they
have declined to do so.The claimant claims interest under s.69 of the County Courts
Act 1984 at 8% a year from the date of each charge to 18th June 2006 of £870.92 and
also interest at same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier at £0.75 per day

I cannot believe what has just happened. I had three accounts with HSBC. I had a Current Account, Credit Card Account and and Loan account with them. They closed my accounts down a couple of years ago with around £500 outstanding on my Credit Card Account and My Loan account was £5000. I pay these off to Metropolitan at £100 per month. HSBC was suppose to refund the charges back to me which i thought that they would send me out a cheque for the refund of the charges on my current account. What they have decided to do was as my current account was closed they have decided that they will pay my credit card and my Loan accounts off instead of giving me the money . These account are seperate accounts which i pay £100 per month but they have decided to pay basically my other accounts off. Surely they cannot pay my seperate loan and Credit Card off? If i still had my Current Account open the money would of been refunded back to the account for me to do whatever but they have taken it upon themselves to pay off my other accounts. Anyone know whether they can do this or not?

I have just been reading the small clims procedure book and came across this. Dont know if this is any good but what do you think.

UNSPECIFIED CLAIM.
make an offer to settle(Rule 14.7) which is what they did.

The defendant(HSBC) should say how much he or she offers to Pay, Also, if time is required to pay, complete the financial information on the admission form. Well they offered a full refund.

If the claiment accepts the offer then he or she can enter a judgement on the admission for the amount admitted. Provided the claim has been paid in full and the payment safely received, the action will be over. Well the claim has been paid in full but the payment hasn't been safely received so surely on this basis if i havent received the payment safely as they have given the payment to themselves the claim isnt over?

What does anyone think of that?

Two more things.

1. Just had a thought aswell, they have decided that they are going to pay my loan and credit card ammounts with the money that i am getting back from their Unlawful charges which people say that they can do. So what i will start to dispute aswell is that if they didnt charge me the scandalous ammount of charges in the first place then the money wouldnt of been there for them to decide to pay off my bills, so who are they to decided with my money what they stole of me 5 years ago?

2. I have just tried to send an email to Colin Langdale(Senior Service Quality Officer) using colinlangdale@hsbc.com and even @hsbc.co.uk and even colin.langdale@hsbc.com and even @hsbc.co.uk and all 4 have been returned as unknown email addy. Why is that then?

Well i will keep you informed as this you will have the same problem i have. Should find out at the beginning of the week.

The bank does not have the right to decide where your money is to be deposited.
The court is not concerned whether the bank is owed money by the claimant in
other accounts- all they are dealing withis whether the money being claimed is a valid claim and if it is, then the money has to be repaid to its rightful owner.

As the bank has opted not to go to Court, then they have to make restitution to the claimant as if the case had been heard and lost by them. There is a form n242a
which you can apply for which makes the bank pay the claim into Court rather than pay you direct. And if you go to this url
PRACTICE DIRECTION*--- OFFERS TO SETTLE AND PAYMENTS INTO COURT*-- This Practice Direction supplements CPR part 36

under paragraph 8.4 you will see "Subject to paragraph 8.5(1) and (2), if a party does not wish the payment to be transmitted into his bank account or if he does not have a bank account, he may send a written request to the Accountant-General for the payment to be made to him by "


So, send a strong letter to the bank giving them the option of returning your money
immediately by cheque, or you will apply to the Accountant General forcing them
to pay you by cheque. They will also incur additional costs because you will restart
interest charges and the cost of applying for form n242a

PS Bear in mind that as the bank have terminated your accounts, they cannot even use their
T&C's to give them the right of offsetting one account against another.

Originally Posted by lookinforinfo

The bank does not have the right to decide where your money is to be deposited.
The court is not concerned whether the bank is owed money by the claimant in
other accounts- all they are dealing withis whether the money being claimed is a valid claim and if it is, then the money has to be repaid to its rightful owner.

As the bank has opted not to go to Court, then they have to make restitution to the claimant as if the case had been heard and lost by them. There is a form n242a
which you can apply for which makes the bank pay the claim into Court rather than pay you direct. And if you go to this url
PRACTICE DIRECTION*--- OFFERS TO SETTLE AND PAYMENTS INTO COURT*-- This Practice Direction supplements CPR part 36

under paragraph *.4 you will see "Subject to paragraph 8.5(1) and (2), if a party does not wish the payment to be transmitted into his bank account or if he does not have a bank account, he may send a written request to the Accountant-General for the payment to be made to him by "


So, send a strong letter to the bank giving them the option of returning your money
immediately by cheque, or you will apply to the Accountant General forcing them
to pay you by cheque. They will also incur additional costs because you will restart
interest charges and the cost of applying for form n242a

great post 8-)

Anyone got any adivce on what to do? I have just spoken to them again and they are refusing to pay the money. They say that because it was without predujuice they can do this. She says they held their part of the bargin and win ask for the court to close the case down. If i wish i have to start a fresh claim regarding how the money should be paid but if i do that, that would be a total different subject which i reckon that they would win.

12 CALTHORPE ROAD
EDGBASTON
BIRMINGHAM
B15 1QZ
DX 712630 Birmingham 32
Deborah D’Aubney
Your Ref:

Our Ref:
Date:
3 July 2006


Dear Sir
Re : Yourself –v- HSBC Bank plc

Thank you for your e-mail of 30 June.

As you have indicated you intend to show this letter to your solicitor we have included authorities where appropriate.

HSBC has not admitted your claim and therefore your references to Part 14 (Admissions) are irrelevant. HSBC has made a without prejudice offer to settle your claim specifically “without any admission of liability whatsoever”. You accepted the offer and we therefore have a concluded contract of compromise between us. You are not entitled to enter judgement on the back of such a compromise as it does not constitute an admission. We have successfully applied to have judgements set aside where this has happened in the past.

You are unhappy that HSBC has not sent you a cheque for the amount of the agreed settlement but has, instead, credited your account which has been passed to debt collectors. You say that this debt is made up of a loan and credit card debt (both of which you acknowledge are in default) and, as such, you say HSBC should not set off the settlement monies against these sums. You say that when you received a similar settlement from Lloyds TSB (where your current account remains open) they did not seek to set off against a loan (which is not in default) with them.

The HSBC situation and the Lloyds situation are clearly different as you are in default with HSBC and are not, apparently, with Lloyds. Your HSBC loan and credit card debts are owed to the same legal entity which is paying you these settlement monies (HSBC Bank plc). As such given that your accounts are in default and demand has been made HSBC is perfectly entitled to set off the monies that would have stood to the credit of your current against the sums outstanding (Paget‘s Law of Banking Chapter 2 6 (a)(vii)).

Your original action has been compromised and is therefore at an end. Any dispute you have with the way HSBC has executed that compromise agreement should be the subject of a separate action (Chitty on Contract, 27th ed, 22-014). We have recently been successful in arguing just this point before the county court.

Your debt being managed by Metropolitan Collection Services Ltd has therefore been reduced by the amount of the settlement - £3851.42 – from £4809.62 to £958.20.

We trust this clarifies the position and would respectfully suggest that you take legal advice as you have indicated you intend to do.


Yours faithfully




DG SOLICITORS

I am drafting a letter to the courts to ask them to carry on with the claim. Anyone got any ideas on what i should say. ?

Please find enclosed my letter regarding this claim. I wish for this claim to still go ahead to court regardless of what the defendants Solicitors say. There are main issues surrounding the claim that the defendants have failed to uphold on their side. I have been mislead into believing that I would be paid in full directly and safely where this has not happened. Also I was informed that the default surrounding this claim aswell would have to be dealt with separately which I have now found that this is not the case and would like this to be dealt with by the courts. Due to the underhanded procedures from the Defendants please take this letter as me wishing to carry on with the claim.

Regards



Paul