Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.
The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights
a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.
Ok first I should say that I'm expecting a roasting for this but all I ask is that you hear me out. I'm not going to attempt to justify bank charges this is merely a tongue in cheek observation based on my experience of a dealing with people in my current job.
The problem is simple, there are lots of silly people out there, but the frequency is staggering. Here is an example, one lady rang the branch to ask how she would go about claiming all her charges back. She had had one of these ambulance chasing type law firms on the phone offering to get them all back. It was all I could do not to shout you're asking the wrong person down the phone. I mean really that's like me calling my insurance company to ask if they think I should sue them.
I have had people kicking up a fuss because they can't arrange thier mortgage in ten minutes. Its probably the largest peice of borrowing they are ever going to do and they can't be bothered to look at it and get all the facts?
Don't get me wrong I've seen loads of colleagues that make themselves look stupid with thier comments on charges but equally I've come across loads and loads of people that kick up a fuss without having even the slightest idea why they charges should be returned.
And yes I know the big bad organisations are to blame BUT perhaps people nowadays are simply not as careful as they formerly were or indeed ought to be? I saw a feature the other day on Watchdog about people taking out a mortgage which means the bank owns a large proportion (I think it was two thirds) of any increase in the value of the customers property. The mortgages were taken out when house prices were much lower and if I had my way the ruling to the banks woul be simple - bugger off you've had more than enough out of this.
At the same time though don't the people who took out the deal have some kind of obiligation to think worst case scenario? What it?
I despise the door step loan sharks that charge exceedingly high interest but, again, what has happened to people that makes them go ok then? I recall reading an article in the paper exploring the connection between the way maths used to be taught (ie learning about compound interest), if you compare this to the present day it seems undeniable that something is very wrong.
Not all of the above is serious, its been quiet round here and I wanted to stir up a little debate. Also people should realize I'm talking morality here not the actual law.
you may be right to a certain degree,but bank staff sometimes do nothing to help their cause.
Think of how long they drag out claims with no intention of going to court,with the express aim of frustrating claimants into giving up.That's merely one area of complaint.
there are many more which I don't have time to go into here and now,but they are well enough documented.
I agree with what you are saying.
I believe that people are getting so used to NOT thinking for themselves and having everything spoon fed they have forgotten how to engage Common Sense.
I had similar customers when I worked in retail.
I was in the booze trade and I would regularly have people asking me for supermarket own brands. They'd end up in a huff because we didn't stock it.
Well it didn't say Tesco/Safeway/Sainsbury/ et al above the door !!!
The GREAT Nanny State will provide all, so why think for ourselves !!!
In this age of information it is truly scary how many "idiots" there are.
If they slip and fall they sue the company, if their delivery is 20 mins late they rant at the driver, if the offer they where interested in finish a week ago they moan at the staff.
I'm sure you see the picture.
Now on the whole the members of CAG are a different breed. True there are some of this type here that demand everything is spoon fed to them, bt luckily they are few and far between. </Rant>
I think it is fair to say, that you should have pointed the caller to CAG, LOL. If they hire a law firm (aka ambulance chasers) shouldn't the chasers do the chasing?
As for bank staff... there are good bank staff, and bad ones; the vast majority seem to be sales people.
i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.
Well basically the firm had said have you had any bank charges in the last six years and the lady thought that sounds good I'll ask my bank.
"Now on the whole the members of CAG are a different breed. True there are some of this type here that demand everything is spoon fed to them, bt luckily they are few and far between."
I totally agree with this, I also do some work for the CAB and I think one of thiers goals is put into practice on here. Yes they seek to give advice but they also seek to support individuals to take action for themselves.
I have this theory that everytime somebody comes up with a labour saving device or something that makes things easier people get compensatingly dumber. You only have to look at the calculator. Yes there are still people who are amazing at maths, there's even a world championship I understand, but my point is the average person on the street is not as good at maths as people used to be.
I once learned how to settle bets and I was astounded by how much you improve through simple repetition. A guy who was taught to settle BEFORE computerised tills will (almost) never forget how to do it but somebody who learned to calculator settle will have to make time to practice or else forget.
Also you would think bank staff would get some kind of training, apart from a fairly simple maths test in the selection process, most of my training was geared towards products and erm selling.
We have targets but on the whole our products are good, I'd much rather that than one of the banks that has rubbish products but still expects you to flog them
"Think of how long they drag out claims with no intention of going to court,with the express aim of frustrating claimants into giving up.That's merely one area of complaint."
That kind of decision is taken well above the staff you see everyday but I see what you're saying, I'm well aware of the arrogance and the attitude that charges are the customers 'fault'. They broke the rules, ummm but we broke the law...
Firstly, you should be more compassionate and realise that not all people may have the intelligence level to match your own, which is why the CAG is a great place to get help and support from fellow members.
You state that you work in the banking industry, if your smart you might want to look for alternative employment because when the banks lose their case, the knock on effect will be huge staff cuts in order that the shareholders targets are met! I don't particularly want to see you or anyone lose their jobs over this issue however its only a shame that after the test case is concluded that staff made redundent and feeling bitter will they then tell the truth!
What really cheeses me off though is that an ex of mine(finished relationship 11 years ago) is one of those people who in the capacity of a consultant (and now very rich)was involved in the programming of banks systems and working out all costings. Shame we no longer speak...
"Firstly, you should be more compassionate and realise that not all people may have the intelligence level to match your own, which is why the CAG is a great place to get help and support from fellow members."
I can accept that, hell its a prerequiste for working for the CAB, literally anyone could walk through the door asking for advice. What I was getting at is a simple lack of interest I've noticed some people display.
I am considering alternative employment but I am very much at the fact finding stage. However I don't beleive there will be siginificant staff cuts, it is going to be VERY interesting though.
Banks and the like don't have the option they had with credit card of tweaking the terms here and there. I think that, on thw whole, people accept a slow counter service because they don't pay up front for it. If people are forced to pay say £10 a month then they'll go more often (understandable) into dissatisfied consumer mode.
The banks really have made a rod for their own back on this one.
BTW I work for Nationwide, we have no shareholders, which makes our policy more bizarre.
Well they do offer a low agreed overdraft interest rate
I don't even know that Nationwide has a plan in relation to charges, their actions so far remind me of an animal caught in the headlights...
Yes they do..... But only available to customers who have never been overdrawn with them, with triple aaa credit history. Not much of a credit risk eh.
Ive banked with them for the past 5 years, never been in the red, and they wont even give me a debit card, Ok i have 1 default for £60, however somone I work with has been bankrupt in last 2 years and have a debit card????
Ive banked with them for the past 5 years, never been in the red, and they wont even give me a debit card, Ok i have 1 default for £60, however somone I work with has been bankrupt in last 2 years and have a debit card????
Go and figure!!!!!
I find this bizarre, cos I got an account with them with debit card and overdraft facility (at 7.??%), and had 3 defaults registered against me at the CRAs when I applied...weird 8)
Um, have you satisified the £60 default? If it was 3 years ago (or more) shouldn't prevent you getting a overdraft. You might have to go to another bank, though.
i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.
Good point most orgs look at how you have managed your accounts with the,. For Nationwide this appears to mean even one tiny mistake or oversight means you're screwed. Well its not quite that bad but sometimes I do struggle to explain why so many people get stuck like this...
someone recently suggested I go into my branch and kick up a fuss .
I calmly reminded him that the branch staff cannot reverse charges, and what use would it be to shout at some staff members who are only doing what they are told.
Some people go in have a go at the person behind the counter about charges and other stuff.
If they were making the rules or could change them, they really wouldn't be sitting behind a counter with a silly looking name badge on would they?
I have to admit I went over my limit it is my fault. but this pushed me further over and led to more charges, its not the charge it is the the amount if it was five pounds a time i'd say fair enough but £35 is a weeks groceries.
In defence of bank staff...
in ten minutes. Its probably the largest peice of borrowing they are ever going to do and they can't be bothered to look at it and get all the facts?
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by vortex
