Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How to wipe a credit report


East Wind
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5990 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have already taken Natwest to court and won, have won the battle against 2 debt companies and am now looking to completely clear my credit report and start from scratch.

 

I cannot currently even apply for a mobile phone contract despite the fact I have been very responsible with my money for the past 3 years now.

 

Has anyone here actually taken Experian or another credit company to court over slander or under the Data Protection Act. And how the hell did this company start in the first place and why do so many people go by their records when so many of them are blatantly incorrect?

 

I am going to start clearing the report as soon as I receive my latest credit report and was wondering if anyone has any generic letters to do this?

 

:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there is incorrect information on a credit report the agencies are under an obligation to amend it - there's a principle which says all information held must be accurate. The same goes for the reporting company - the information they supply must be accurate.

 

Tell them to correct it as soon as possible otherwise you will start action for libel (its written words not spoken which is slander). Libel actions are expensive so your best bet would be to make a strongly worded complaint to the Information Commissioner.

 

But before you set the ball rolling get copies of your credit reports as they stand so you have details of what they are saying about you now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the help Nailpost. Have typed up all the letters and ready to send. 2 questions though:

 

1. Can I send a cheque as opposed to a postal order?

2. I took Natwest to court earlier this year and won back all charges, shall I put this in the letter to them to take off the default? Any idea on wording other than " you know you're wrong you b******s because you paid up in the end so take off the damn default before I come down there and...."!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Eastwind,

 

I think you'll find it very diffucult to get Natwest to remove the default, pretty confident you'll need to start a claim against them to get it done, a friend of mine was in the same situation albeit with RBS.

 

If there were charges on the account then the default notice can be voided by precedent set in the Woodchester Lease Management Services Ltd v Swain and Co case, basically it stipulates if the 'sum due' that is stated on the default is incorrect which in this case it will be as it incorporates unlawful penalty charges then the default notice is invalid and subsequently voided. I would suggest you put pressure on the CRA's to remove the default on the grounds that they have a responsibility to ensure all info they hold is accurate and to take steps to ensure that is the case.

 

regards,

shane

____________________________________________

All advice is offered freely & without prejudice

 

 

If my post has been useful to you please click the scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi ian,

 

it depends what the nature of the inaccuracy was, if for example the default was incorrectly served, or it was served where no agreement was in place or as I stated above with regard to the 'sum due' being incorrect because of penalty charges then the only correction the CRA's can make is to remove it.

 

Can you explain a little more about your situation

 

kind regards,

shane

____________________________________________

All advice is offered freely & without prejudice

 

 

If my post has been useful to you please click the scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

well its a couple of situations.

 

British Gas - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/utilities-gas-electricity-water/120104-british-refunded-me-then.html

 

&

 

Open University - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/120097-default.html

 

I am writing to open university with the following letter

 

RE – Open University Student Business Account – xxxx

Letter sent recorded delivery on 16th November 2007

Data Protection Act 1998 - Subject Access Request

Please supply me with all of the personal data that you hold to which I am entitled under the Data Protection Act 1998.

Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any member of your staff, or any other person, I require disclosure of any indication or manual notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my business with you.

The reason I am requesting this is –

The law is simple. If you did not issue me with a default notice you should not have registered a default against me with the credit reference agencies.

I am meticulous in keeping all the correspondence I receive from anyone other than advertisements and I am certain you did not advise me of the fact that you were going to issue a default against me on this account.

If you do not include among the information a true certified copy of the original default notice I will take this up with the Office of Fair Trading and Trading Standards and will make a complaint to Experian, Equifax and Call Credit asking them to remove the information relating to this account from their records.

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of 10 pounds. You have 40 days in which to comply.

British gas I have only spoken to on the phone but intend writing to them to again do a full SAR. I called them to cancel my account then moved after they sent me a refund becuase I had overpaid then i find out they have defaulted me for money outstanding!!!

It has ruined my credit file.

Thanks for your help

Ian

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

E – Open University Student Business Account – xxxx

 

Letter sent recorded delivery on 16th November 2007

 

Data Protection Act 1998 - Subject Access Request

 

Please supply me with all of the personal data that you hold to which I am entitled under the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any member of your staff, or any other person, I require disclosure of any indication or manual notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my business with you.

 

The reason I am requesting this is –

 

The law is simple. If you did not issue me with a default notice you should not have registered a default against me with the credit reference agencies. you do not need to give them a reason so i would remove this

 

I am meticulous in keeping all the correspondence I receive from anyone other than advertisements and I am certain you did not advise me of the fact that you were going to issue a default against me on this account.

 

If you do not include among the information a true certified copy of the original default notice I will take this up with the Office of Fair Trading and Trading Standards and will make a complaint to Experian, Equifax and Call Credit asking them to remove the information relating to this account from their records.

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of 10 pounds. You have 40 days in which to comply.

 

 

 

it may be worth taking a more softly softly approach for starter

 

you may want to include something along the lines of...

 

For clarification purposes please send me the following

 

a copy of any default notice held on your files relating to this account

 

a copy of any credit agreement relating to the account along with terms and conditions referred to within the agreement (they are not obliged to send t&cs but worth a try)

 

copies of the data contained within my statements relating to all transactions

 

and any other data held in your files relating to me

 

 

Regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subbing

 

This is something that has interested me. I've been very tempted to give the CRAs a section 10 notice under the DPA to cease processing any defamatory data unless they have strict proof that this data is warranted (the word of a creditor not being strict proof)

All my posts are made without prejudice and may not be reused or reproduced without my express permission (or the permission of the forums owners)!

 

17/10/2006 Recieve claim against me from lloyds TSB for £312.82

18/10/06 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

03/02/07 Claim allocated to small claims. Hearing set for 15/05/07. Lloyds ordered to file statement setting out how they calculate their charges

15/05/07 Lloyds do not attend. Judgement ordered for £192 approx, £3 travel costs and removal of default notice

29/05/07 4pm Lloyds deadline for payment of CCJ expires. Warrant of execution ready to go

19/06/07 Letter from court stating Lloyds have made a cheque payment to court

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well I sent the letters to the various companies who have put a default on my account. Orange have basically admitted they have no record of what I need and have asked for a copy of my credit report in order to check this out!

 

And Natwest have told me the exact date and location they sent it to and said that it was a computer generated letter and therefore don't have a copy. I was living at that address at the time and I did not receive it. Any ideas what I should do? Is this a fob off?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...