The way I see it, and I'm probably totally wrong here, but the courts are offering a service for which they take payment i.e. you pay for a claim to be brought in front of the court, you then pay again for the allocation and the hearing. So isn't a stay in effect the court is withholding a service that you've legally paid for. Isn't that sort of legal transaction covered in consumer law somewhere?

Wellllll, they do say there's no such thing as a stupid question... unless of course it's "where's the any key?"

Similar Threads: