Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • FINAL UPDATE.  I have not posted as the defence were reading the thread.  An agreement was reached on the day of the hearing.   I am unable to go into detail but for those in this position the forum has been priceless support and advice so thank you all in the site team.   for those going through this, follow the process, ignore intimidating tactics and threats and get to the Judge.  They are very supporting of those self representing.   I note her name has gone from the heading of the thread.  Was this them ?  Thanks again.  
    • I'm not sure what the "appeal" system asked but he said he definitely didn't indicate he was the driver so I'm just going to have to take his word for it. Honestly, I don't think the hirer will contact them. I think my brother will tolerate it. I did have a similar experience with another company 6-7 years ago and sought advice on here then to which you guys told me to ignore, I got the exact same DRP letters and then a "Gladstones Solicitor" letter.  After that nothing happened and it died away. Based on my experience with that I assumed the same would happen here but only asked to see if perhaps anything had changed since then.    Hopefully it doesn't get to court but if it did, I feel like we have enough evidence to sway a judge who probably hates dealing with this type of nonsense anyway. Or maybe I'm too optimistic. 
    • Your attachment showing the cinema parking restrictions seems crystal clear. Let's see what the photos turn up.
    • Meter certification periods re given in The Meters (Certification) Regulations 1998, Schedule 4. From there you can check if they are correct about your specific meter .. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1998/1566/schedule/4 If they're telling porkies then you have e clear grounds to tell them to take  hike. If they're correct or if you haven't been able to confirm then you have  few options. You could just keep fobbing them off. In general Octopus can't keep up with demand for smart meters. It took 9 months to get our. So they may not push too hard. Or ask if you can install your own choice of meter. The Electricity Act 1989 cover this in Schedule 7 (2) and (2A) https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/29/schedule/7 Or fight the them and their enforcement. Or go off supply.
    • We received a copy of the completed Directions Questionnaire (N181) from the solicitors along with a draft copy of their directions. I am on a course today so can upload over the weekend if needed. By 4pm on 16th May both parties must each give standard disclosure of documents by way of list by category. By 4pm on 30th May any request for inspection or copies of docs must be made and compiled 14 days thereafter. I will provide more over the weekend.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Eforegg v BOS


eforegg
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6414 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, sorry if this is longwinded, need a bit of advice. . .

 

I have a BOS visa which 3 years ago in a drunken moment used to subscribe to an satelite channel. I know I'm a total idiot but hey-ho it happened. It was £10 a month approx, and mini contract term of 1 year. After the year, I moved house and didn't get sky in the new home so I phoned said company to stop the payment, needed to send in writing so wrote letter but at same time phoned Visa to say can you cancel the direct debit. Turns out it's not a direct debit but some other sort of standing payment, meaning I can only cancel in writing, otherwise the will honour any request by the other party.

 

Anyway both sides said "oh we never received that letter" had another 2/3 calls with BOS Visa saying stop paying this, I've sent a letter, and I'll resend and asked who in their organisation I could complain to. As it was after 6pm, customer relations was shut open till 5.30 or 1 pm on Sat. Ok I"ll try on Sat, queue, after queue, after queue. One thing leads to another days become weeks, weeks become months and you can probably guess the rest. I forgot all about it, I haven't used the card at all recently (last 7 months) and just pay off the mini each month on a DD. This charge has still been taken. It also transpires their where times a couple of years ago, this deduction was putting me over my limit and them getting charges, etc.

 

I the bank have a note of my telephone request as this was confirmed in calls when I was originally complaining, whats the best way to approach this? Any advice would be greatfully received, I'm definitely not going to be so appathetic this time.

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you can sign up to a 12 month contract by phone then you can pretty much cancel it by phone to the company concerned as well i'd imagine.

I'd say the tv company are just trying to stall you and they have no right to do this. I've seen lots of companies do this sort of thing in the past and then say "oh but we never ever got your letter..." Even sending recorded delivery has had similar problems

 

The bank is right in that you can't have a DD on a credit card. What you're actually paying is a regular credit card payment. This means the tv channel have your details and just present a payment request every time they want the money. But credit card payments need authorised by yourself if not they are illegal. If you've told the tv channel not to take any further payments and they do then tell your bank that the payments have been taken without your authorisation and you can have them refunded (though this could take 4-6 weeks) The credit card company cannot put a block on the tv channel from taking your payments however, it needs to be that they come off first and then you can claim them back.

 

If it continues to happen I suppose you could take the tv channel to county court for continuing to take payments from you without your authorisation. I would record a phonecall confirming the cancellation with the tv channel 1st (make sure you tell them you are recording it otherwise it is inadmissable in court)

 

Hope this helps

  • Confused 1

(Yes I work for a bank but am here to help! Please be nice to me! :))

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with regular credit card payments is you can authorise them, but you can't cancel them - not in the way that you can cancel your direct debits via the bank anyway. Because they are guaranteed payments you need to ask the company you (or the credit card company) are paying to stop them.

 

Send all future letters by recorded delivery and ask for acknowledgement of reciept, I have always found that it's best to ask the credit card vendor to stop the payments, they will then normally get in touch with the company to whom they are making the payments, but write to both anyway. always remember to date your letters.

I only mouth my opinion, please look elsewhere for sensible advice! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies.

 

Thats really my bone of contention. I gave up on the 'service provider' and thought going direct to the card company would be the best route. I think I made 6 calls in total (2 of them stupidily getting hooked and really losing the plot as I was getting a real run around) to the BOS and wrote 2 letters and still payments are made.

 

This forum has really galvanised me into action.

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi, firstly thanks to everyone who contributes to this site, what a brillaint resource, a true people power tool.

 

Secoondly I'm about to send of my LBA and wanted to know if it sounds okay. What I'm saying is factually correct however, to say I'm nervous is an understatement and dont want the banks to get a whiff I've my nerves and start to play hardball.

 

Any comments would be appreciated. . .

 

Thank you for your recent letter dated 12 June 2006 (which I assume should have read 12th June) I am sorry you were unable to contact me via telephone.

 

I have decided to decline your "getsure of goodwill" of £190.00. Specifically because I now understand that the regime of 'fees' which you have been applying to my account in relation to direct debit refusals, exceeding overdraft limits and so forth are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations.

 

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

 

I am frankly shocked that you have operated my account in this way as I had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise as my fiduciary.

 

As per my previous letter I calculate that you have taken £2920 of unlawful charges up to and including the 21st September 2005.

 

I am enlosing a copy of the schedule of the charges which I am claiming. I have already sent you a copy of this in my original email of the 5th June 2006, which you may refer to.

 

I require repayment in full of this money. If you do not comply fully within 14 days then I shall begin a claim against you initially for charges taken during the period 14 June 2000 to the 14 Aug 2002 inclusive totally £700 plus interest plus my costs and without further notice. Subsequent claims will follow for the remainder of the charges.

 

etc, etc, etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds good but should the 'inclusive totally' in the bottom paragraph be 'inclusive totalling'?

Sky

BOS - Prelim letter del 19/5/06 LBA del. no response - filed 12/06

Clydesdale Financial Services - Gave them their chances off to court we go!

HSBC - Watch out I'm coming after you next!

 

If you like anything I say click the scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right thats my LBA off. . .fingers crossed. . .and heart rate racing:-)

 

Actually I dont know if anyone else is doing similar but I have sent all my requests via email ([email protected]) I obviously save all sent and received items.

 

Thanks again to all who provide support and assistance on here, priceless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Surprise, suprise one day before 14 day deadline, a subsequent reply this time it's from Halfiax Plc Customer relations in Leeds. I've outlined the letter below:-

 

I am sorry to learn that you are unhappy with our initial offer to refund £190.00 worth of charges. As we have explained previously, the charges we apply to your account do recover costs so we cannot agree to refund them all. However, in an attempt to reach an amicable solution to your complaint, I am prepared to increase my offer to £560.00 in full and final settlement of your complaint. I will reiterate that future valid charges will stand and we reserve the right to close your account if you do not manage it correctly. If you are prepared to accpet my revised offer, please sign and return the enclosed acceptance form in the pre-paid envelope.

 

Do I respond accepting the amount and state I will now be applying to the courts to recoup the remainder of my claim (total is £2900) so will be doing it in the £700 bursts. Or do I ask them to outline the costs they have incurred with a view to reaching an amicable agreement or do I just go straight to completing the small claims form?

 

I guess I'm approaching the scary stage plus the threat of account closure!!! I think I need that parachute account now!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry can someone advise do I respond initally to the banks reply and wait x amount of time to see how they respond or do I just press ahead with small claims? I thought I was getting the hang of it however their letter has threw me a bit.

 

Any help most appreicated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personnaly, if it were me, i would just press ahead with the monayclaim, stick to your time table not theirs. you could always accept the offer as an interim payment only and persue the rest of the charges.

 

P.S, Sign Nothing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them this, then after 7 days (given they have had the two 14 day periods already) file your Claim at MCOL

 

Rebel

 

**********

 

[Your Address]

[bank Address]

My Ref:

Request for repayment of charges

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER:

Sort Code:

 

Date:

Your Ref:

Dear Sir

Thank you for your letter of [date]. I draw your attention to my letter to you, [Ref/Date] As you seem to have disregarded my request for FULL repayment of the unlawful charges you have placed on my account.

You continue to quote your Terms & Conditions relating to the use of my account, I draw your attention to the following:-

Your charges do not reflect any actual loss, instead they appear to represent a lucrative profit-making scheme. In particular, charges were applied after I entered into a transaction(s) without sufficient funds in my account. Actual loss is the cost of automatically sending me a computer generated letter. I would respectfully submit that this is valued at no more than 50 pence.

 

UK banks have recently given evidence to the House of Commons Treasury Committee on how bank charges are calculated: "The costs are going to pay for all the people we have who pursue debt, collect debt, speak to customers and chase payments. The way these charges are arrived at is by taking these total costs and making some assumptions about the volume that is going to come through to arrive at the individual charges" (2nd report, 25 January 2005, paragraph 50).

 

Accordingly, the charges applied to my account are not a reasonable pre-estimate of the bank’s loss in relation to my account. Your charges would appear to represent a device to recover global losses (for example, loan defaulters, bad debt write off, including commercial lending in, and outside, the UK).

 

On a separate note, your charges appear to represent an unfair term of contract which is contrary to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 (SI. 1999/2083). My account falls within the ambit of Regulation 5 of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 as I am a consumer. Your charges constitute an unfair penalty under reference to paragraph 1(e) of schedule 2 of the said regulations:

 

‘Indicative and non-exhaustive list of terms which may be regarded as unfair - 1. Terms which have the object of effect of - (e) requiring any consumer who fails his obligation to pay a disproportionately high sum in compensation’.

 

0n 26 July 2005 the OFT stated that 'a charge is likely to be disproportionately high if it is more than a court would be likely to award if the lender sued the cardholder for breach of contract'. Because your charges include a large profit margin, in addition to actual loss, they are irrecoverable as an unfair term in contract. I believe that your charges require me to pay a disproportionately high sum in compensation for incurring a transaction(s) which was ultimately declined by an automated computer system.

 

In addition, it is unfair to require me to subsidise your global debt recovery costs and debt write-off.

I thank you for your offer of £xxxxx however I cannot nor will not accept this as full and final payment, especially not under your proposed conditions. You now have 7 days in which to return the FULL amount of £xxxxx in charges and £xxxxx (including 8% interest as per s69 County Court Act 1984), in calculated interest on these charges, after which, there will be no further communication from me and I will pursue this matter through the County Court.

Yours Sincerely

vs Barclays Bank plc - £1670+interest @ 8% + Costs Concluded 24th June 06 - 5% donation sent

vs Bank of Scotland - £2226.42+interest @ 8% + Costs SETTLED IN FULL 6th Aug INCLUDING 8% pre court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi

 

Find myself with a bit of a problem and not sure how to resume. I never held to any of the above timetables as unfortunately after posting above my father died suddenly. To cut a long story short, mother died years ago and only other family member, a brother lives abroad, therefore I've been dealing with my fathers estate (there was no will) and just trying to get over it (we were close)

 

This claim went totally out of the window in this period however 2/3 weeks ago I emailed BoS to say sorry I hadn't been in touch formally due to fathers death but as I had not been in touch would give them an opportunity to re consider their offer. I'm now not sure what to do and I guess not sure I've alread missed the opportunity. Kind of lacking the energy but really want to put this to bed.

 

Any help or advice would be appreciated.

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for bumping this up just not sure if I've blown my opportuniy to claim by being all over the place.

 

I've not seen anything re this on the site (and to be honest, up until the events with my father things were going so well was about to complete the small claims paperwork.

 

Any help guidance at all would be appreciated.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 2019-03-08.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6414 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...