Thread: Barclays begging us to write a letter to courts to accept the set a side

Hi my Husband had a succesful claim back in febuary because Barclays defaulted on the claim didn't send back the acknowledgement form. WHEN HE RECIEVED THE MONEY BACK we sent a letter to the courts be for the court date to say they had paid us in full. at the time barclays had asked the court for a set a side and barclays told us that the courts had agreed with it, but this was before any court hearing. we hadn't got this in writing.

Now we have got a court date for december for the set a side, barclays just phoned us asking/begging us to write a letter to the courts to say that we agree to the set a side because the courts stoke it out/they won't give them one and they don't want a default judgement entered. Well it has been already.

What do you think we should do.

Similar Threads:

• Lambeth Unclear Signs one side of road pay and display the other side for residents
• Intrum Justitia/Paypal begging for help
• Halifax do I write another letter re LBA ?
• What should i write in mt letter
• Maybe they are trying to get the courts on side (or am I just cynical?)

let them sweat for it tell them you dont accept phone calls but if you want to be as fair as they were then do nothing just remember your worries and what did they do for you this is my opinion only

Thanks guys,
just one question, in the conversation my husband told them he would write the letter does that matter.

I personally don't think we should write a letter for them, because when we initially started the recovery proceedings, they stopped all our direct debits and standing orders coming out and told us that it was because we were over drawn even thought they knew that his wages went in there every month and cleared the over draft. So we couldn't pay our motgages and other bills.

I personally don't think we should write a letter for them, because when we initially started the recovery proceedings, they stopped all our direct debits and standing orders coming out and told us that it was because we were over drawn even thought they knew that his wages went in there every month and cleared the over draft. So we couldn't pay our motgages and other bills
i am quite sure had they not missed the hearing,they would still be fighting their corner and you would have gone through yet more months of turmoil and worry besides all the side effects this brings with it,relaitionships arguements etc...they would nt have given two hoots for your worries,like i said you have no need to speak with them nor colude with them,be intrsting if you sent them a letter for compensation for all the sleeples wory nights you both had to go through...the requested letter you felt was puting more
unreasonable pressure upon both of you and have decided that it is not in your intrest to be so obliging since no letters of apoligy has been forthcoming as you would have liked to have had,even a curtious phone call during the times they were defaulting your account i wonder if they are still on record which no doubt they still may have under their credit scoring system it is unlikely they will erase all this information.

is it a possibility the banks are trying to resurect the case ?

I sent the courts a letter that I had been paid in full, and it is the court bundle that they have sent to me also I have had to sign a letter written by Barclays solicitors stating that they have paid me. When I spoke to barclays they said they know I have done that,

but it is a different letter they need me to write stating that I accept the set a side, because they have asked and the courts still wants it to go to trial. But I thought it would be for the judge to decide.
I will send another copy of the letter anyway the one where they have paid me in full.

The begining of their letter says.
The hearing of the defendant's application for the default judgement entered on 27 november 2006 be set a side pursuant to CPR r13.2 will take place 19th december.

They wanted it set a side because I altered my claim so they acknowledged the first claim, but thought (they say) that they didn't have to acknowledge the altered claim even though it is counted as a new claim.

R13-2-2. Definitions.

(1) "Records officer" means the individual appointed by
the division to fulfill the function of Subsection 63-2-103(21).
(2) "Division" means a division of the Department of
Administrative Services.

R13-2. Access to Records.

is their anything else with this letter,i am not sure what it really means ,but if a second letter goes to court explaining payments have been settled ,and someone has aknowleged this from court...i cannot see what the administrative records section is for or why they are asking surely they should write to the court

did you sign a disclaimer or was their ay asking you to sign a waiver of some sort...or do they want you to remove a default against them this sounds more plausable
patrickq1

very nicely i like that lula

Yes they want us to remove a default against them.