Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
    • In anticipation of lodging my court claim next Weds 1 May (14 days after advising P2G that was my deadline for them to settle my claim) I have completed my first draft POC as below: Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant has failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing a 8 secondhand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80 I look forward to your thoughts and comments guys! As ever, many thanks - G59    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Handing a car back to finance company has left me with default threats, & harrassment


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5360 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hope someone can help advise me here.

4 months ago, I wrote to finance co. to terminate HP contract & return car. I had paid 65% but car was worth less than I owed even at early settlement. Having spent £2000 on repairs, I felt it was my only option at purchasing a new car. I never defaulted any payments. Finance co took 4 weeks to collect car from a local garage. They then started ringing me & asking for payment for damage to car. I pointed out that it was in very good condition, to which local garage agreed and I added that ariel was already broken when purchased and battery was flat as car had stood for 4 weeks.

I had nothing in writing and hadn't heard anything for 4 months when I received a call to say that I owed £2200! After arguing the case I was promised an update. Receievd nothing for a few days, then a call asking for £365.00. I said that I disputed these charges and now felt harrassed by company. Caller said as measure of good will, they would drop payment to £200. I stood my ground to then receive threats that company would default me and give me a bad credit report.

Wondered if anyone has experienced similar. Feel like just giving in, but don't believe that I should owe them money. Can they default me without my knowledge?

Best regards y'all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you have paid 50% of the agreement you are entitled to return the vehicle so long as you have put the request in writing. this is called voluntary termination and it is part of the consumer credit act. the firms do try and fob people off citing damage and the like and usually we advise our clients to take photographs just in case. if they have defaulted you without notice that is VERY naughty. it might be worth speaking to the credit reference agency in question and see what can be done.

 

in the meantime here is more info on hire puchase >>

 

http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/england_wales/factsheet.php?page=16_how_to_deal_with_hire_purchase_debt

 

edit: i just need to double check, you never defaulted on payments prior to returning it?!?!

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for advice. No, I never missed a payment and paid 65% before vt. Did put it in writing, but didn't take any pics. The few things they reckon add up to £365 are there, but as I said, the car was 7 year old, you would expect to find a few scuffs on the bumper. I just feel they are trying to bully me into making some sort of payment. Feels like the girl in question is working on commission!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jooly, I was in a similar position about 10 years ago, and a company did the same to me, tried to get me to pay for damage that was already there etc. I stood my ground and eventually went through arbitration. The judge was completely on my side, and knew the tactics of credit companies like these, and I came out of there feeling so euphoric. I didn't have to pay anything at all to them, plus the judge made their rep look and feel like a fool. That was the most satisfying thing ever;-)

Hope it all goes well for you and if push comes to shove remember the law is on your side:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi - I work as a finance manager in a big car supermarket & look at finance docs all day. The wording in the termination clause says "You have a right to end this agreement. To do so you should write to the person you make your payments to. They will then be entitled to the return of the goods and half the total amount payable under this agreement, that is £XXXX. If you have already paid this amount plus any overdue instalments and have taken REASONABLE care of the goods you will not have to pay any more." It seems to me that "reasonable" is quite a subjective term. Anybody could reasonably expect a 4/5 year old car to have a few dents & scratches. Heres something important to look out for - at the time of taking out the agreement most people also buy one or more insurance products (PPI,Gap etc). There is normally a separate CREDIT agreement for these (NOT HP). Sometimes this is not made clear when signing and the signatures are normally on the same page - these amounts would still be owed to the finance company even if the car is handed back so if you have taken out a £2000 PPI policy chances are you will still owe £1000. PPI is the most profitable part of a finance deal for both the finance company and the dealership and the cover offered is available for about a fifth of the price charged through standalone products - try googling PPI or CPI. If anyone has any other queries about car finance PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Hi,

I wonder if someone could help me with my problem. I phoned the finance company today to ask their procedure for returning my car. They told me that Arnold Clark had taken out a personal loan on the car for me. The finance company said therefore I could not VT the car. When I was buying the car Arnold Clark told me it was a car loan that I had. What should I do now. I still have £5500.00 to pay on the car which I have been paying for 3 years and it is only valued at £2100.00. :sad:

 

Any help would be great-full.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 51187,

 

It best to start your own tread to get help for yourself.

 

If you click on General Knowledge - The Consumer Forums to take you back to the main forum and then click on

newthread.gif

 

and copy your post from here an paste it in the new thread

 

Ida x

 

ps welcome to cag

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

or just click the new thread button in the above post

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...