Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yep, I agree with what you are saying, I only mentioned the governing body code of practice as a nod to the fact that I wasn't dismissing the BPA or whoever out of hand, thought that would go in my favour before a judge. I wrote a long post about the BPA CoP earlier but then deleted it because I realised I wasn't talking about points of law but a set of guidelines drawn up by one bunch of charlatans for another bunch of charlatans. It is ludicrous that the 5 minute consideration period doesn't apply if the motorist parks, such nonsense. As for legislation, I was referring to the government legislation (if it is legislation?) document which has been withdrawn. Does that stand until it has been reintroduced? In the explanatory document it is quite clear. Otherwise, how does one hold them to the consideration and grace periods? Or is that at the discretion of the judge?
    • Thank you all   JK, I agree; if they were to accept my full claim today, then the interest would be around 8-9 pounds. If I were them, I would have offered to pay the interest and said no to the 12 pounds for the letters. These have not been mentioned, which is my mistake.   As you pointed out, if the judge were to award at 4% and I did not get the letters, I would get less.   Bank, thank you. I do hear what you are saying. If I am to continue with this, then I will need to pay an additional trial fee of £59. If I win everything, then great, but if I win less the claim and court fee, then I lose out. I am not sure what the judge will think about the interest. I think we have to remember that I won the item and, therefore, did not pay a penny for it. Yes, I have had to purchase an additional one, but maybe the judge will hold this against me. I am content that this is a win. I have not signed any non-disclosure clauses, and they do not ask for this either in their offer. 
    • Are you saying that both businesses were closed? Yet you stayed there for over two hours. . If both were closed than to charge £100 is a penalty since Horizon had no legitimate interest in keeping spaces clear for the company. sake as there were no customers..
    • Well you would think that would be the case. Sadly i doubt there is one honest broker within the BPA or IPC and most of their members. they are there to take as much money as they can from motorists regardless of PoFA.   Take the Consideration  period for example. This is a minimum of 5 minutes to allow motorists to find a parking space, read the T&Cs giving them enough time to leave the car park without having to pay if they decide not stay. Simple. Well it would be simple if it were any other company than BPA [or IPC who have now fallen into line with BPA's "reasoning"].  You see if you decide to stay then despite the fact that during the Consideration period when you still weren't classed as parking , once you accept the terms [with all the underhand little tricks designed to trip you up] that five minutes is now included in your parking time. [No not the parking period because the poor dears who ANPR cameras are apparently unable to work out what the exact parking period is since their ever so infallible cameras [yeah right] are incapable of tracking cars once they are in a car park]. After 12 years they still haven't worked out a way of doing it. Some of them fudge and the majority [with a wink fro their ATA [Accredited Trade Association though it should be Discredited Trade Association] just ignore the parking period all together. This is what BPA claim is the Consideration period Entrance grace period: This is for when motorists enter a car park, read the signs and/or attempt to make payment then leave. In these instances, motorists must be offered a reasonable amount of time before an operator takes enforcement action, but we do not define this time, due to the variance in size and layout of car parks. An entrance grace period for a small, permit-only car park could be below 5 minutes, whereas for a large multi-story this could be 15. But  heaven forbid that anyone should leave 6 or 7 minutes after entering  their member's car parks. . They are dutybound to receive a PCN. This is regardless of how busy the car park would be [Christmas eve for example ] .Our minimum is their maximum. Moving on to Grace periods. Again BPA gobble degook. Exit grace period: This must be a minimum of 10 minutes and this is when a motorist intends to stay – for example, if you paid for an hour but spent a total of 1 hour 10 minutes on-site, you will not receive a PCN. It is important to note that the grace period is not a free period of parking however and should not be advertised as such. If that ten minutes in not free parking what is it. their members all think they can send out PCNs for anything after 1 minute after the exact time never mind ten minutes. Our snotty letters have stood the test of time. Do not try to reinvent the wheel -especially with DCBL . They don't even know what a non compliant PCN is for goodness sake! You already know more about PoFA then they do. However if you include that they will find a way to disabuse the Judge of your logic and the law. So don't give them the chance.  I am sure you have the Parking Prankster going on about the rogues misusing the rules on planning permission by lying and stating that they had "retrospective permission". There is no such thing in English law yet Judges were swallowing it until one Judge pulled up Parking Eye about one of their Witness Statements alluding to "rp" by claiming it was "tantamount to perjury".  It wasn't tantamount,it was plain and simple perjury. Parking Prankster: The great private car park planning approval scam PARKING-PRANKSTER.BLOGSPOT.COM Guest blog from shuteyepark, from the Consumer Action group forums In December 2013 my daughter received a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) fro... Hope it wasn't too long winded Nicky Boy.🙂
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Handing a car back to finance company has left me with default threats, & harrassment


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5355 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hope someone can help advise me here.

4 months ago, I wrote to finance co. to terminate HP contract & return car. I had paid 65% but car was worth less than I owed even at early settlement. Having spent £2000 on repairs, I felt it was my only option at purchasing a new car. I never defaulted any payments. Finance co took 4 weeks to collect car from a local garage. They then started ringing me & asking for payment for damage to car. I pointed out that it was in very good condition, to which local garage agreed and I added that ariel was already broken when purchased and battery was flat as car had stood for 4 weeks.

I had nothing in writing and hadn't heard anything for 4 months when I received a call to say that I owed £2200! After arguing the case I was promised an update. Receievd nothing for a few days, then a call asking for £365.00. I said that I disputed these charges and now felt harrassed by company. Caller said as measure of good will, they would drop payment to £200. I stood my ground to then receive threats that company would default me and give me a bad credit report.

Wondered if anyone has experienced similar. Feel like just giving in, but don't believe that I should owe them money. Can they default me without my knowledge?

Best regards y'all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you have paid 50% of the agreement you are entitled to return the vehicle so long as you have put the request in writing. this is called voluntary termination and it is part of the consumer credit act. the firms do try and fob people off citing damage and the like and usually we advise our clients to take photographs just in case. if they have defaulted you without notice that is VERY naughty. it might be worth speaking to the credit reference agency in question and see what can be done.

 

in the meantime here is more info on hire puchase >>

 

http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/england_wales/factsheet.php?page=16_how_to_deal_with_hire_purchase_debt

 

edit: i just need to double check, you never defaulted on payments prior to returning it?!?!

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for advice. No, I never missed a payment and paid 65% before vt. Did put it in writing, but didn't take any pics. The few things they reckon add up to £365 are there, but as I said, the car was 7 year old, you would expect to find a few scuffs on the bumper. I just feel they are trying to bully me into making some sort of payment. Feels like the girl in question is working on commission!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jooly, I was in a similar position about 10 years ago, and a company did the same to me, tried to get me to pay for damage that was already there etc. I stood my ground and eventually went through arbitration. The judge was completely on my side, and knew the tactics of credit companies like these, and I came out of there feeling so euphoric. I didn't have to pay anything at all to them, plus the judge made their rep look and feel like a fool. That was the most satisfying thing ever;-)

Hope it all goes well for you and if push comes to shove remember the law is on your side:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi - I work as a finance manager in a big car supermarket & look at finance docs all day. The wording in the termination clause says "You have a right to end this agreement. To do so you should write to the person you make your payments to. They will then be entitled to the return of the goods and half the total amount payable under this agreement, that is £XXXX. If you have already paid this amount plus any overdue instalments and have taken REASONABLE care of the goods you will not have to pay any more." It seems to me that "reasonable" is quite a subjective term. Anybody could reasonably expect a 4/5 year old car to have a few dents & scratches. Heres something important to look out for - at the time of taking out the agreement most people also buy one or more insurance products (PPI,Gap etc). There is normally a separate CREDIT agreement for these (NOT HP). Sometimes this is not made clear when signing and the signatures are normally on the same page - these amounts would still be owed to the finance company even if the car is handed back so if you have taken out a £2000 PPI policy chances are you will still owe £1000. PPI is the most profitable part of a finance deal for both the finance company and the dealership and the cover offered is available for about a fifth of the price charged through standalone products - try googling PPI or CPI. If anyone has any other queries about car finance PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Hi,

I wonder if someone could help me with my problem. I phoned the finance company today to ask their procedure for returning my car. They told me that Arnold Clark had taken out a personal loan on the car for me. The finance company said therefore I could not VT the car. When I was buying the car Arnold Clark told me it was a car loan that I had. What should I do now. I still have £5500.00 to pay on the car which I have been paying for 3 years and it is only valued at £2100.00. :sad:

 

Any help would be great-full.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 51187,

 

It best to start your own tread to get help for yourself.

 

If you click on General Knowledge - The Consumer Forums to take you back to the main forum and then click on

newthread.gif

 

and copy your post from here an paste it in the new thread

 

Ida x

 

ps welcome to cag

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

or just click the new thread button in the above post

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...