Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Member of the Question Time audience asks Richard Tice about Donald Trump.    
    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Blemain - lies and harassment


Challenging
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2743 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I called Blemain yesterday regarding their failure to provide a breakdown of charges and supply me with their complaints procedure. I spoke to their aggressive and appalling Collections Manager who told my husband that they were going to throw us out of our house next week. We told him that they had to follow the correct legal procedure and that they hadn’t notified us. He told us that they could do what they liked and that he didn’t have to write to us. He told us that they could just turn up and didn’t have to give notice. We told him that the eviction date related tour 1st Mortgage, not them and that this was being deferred and sorted. He told us that we were talking rubbish.

We today visited the bailiff who told us that they didn’t have an eviction date and that it did indeed relate to the first mortgage. He told us that Blemain had called him and asked for us to be evicted next week. He told them that they had to apply for a warrant and wait approximately 4 weeks (they applied to the wrong court). They weren’t happy with this and asked for it to be executed at the same time as the first lender – even he was appalled. He told them not to bother to turn up as they had no jurisdiction. I am so angry at their tactics and will make it my mission to make them pay. The FSA have lodged a complaint about their conduct and unlawful tactics, Trading Standards told me to call the police and the FSA also told me to call the Ombudsman about their behaviour, which I will do tomorrow. I am also going to meet my MP about these bullies and have lodged a complaint with Cheshire Mortgage Corporation

Any advice on their tactics?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I know when timing becomes critical that there is a temptation to use the phone. Try to avoid it as anything can be said over the phone that would not

be put in writing. But once you have it on paper, your case becomes stronger.

So only ever write to these people.

In order to establish what was said on the phone yesterday, you could try writing to them restating what the Collections manager said and pointing out

that you maintain that legally they have to observe the proper procedures.

And ask for their comments. Do not mention your conversation with the bailiff

company to them, nor that you are involving the FSA TS etc etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where a phone conversation has taken place, it is often helpful to follow up with a letter along the lines of:

 

I refer to my telephone conversation with XXX of (date). My understanding of the conversation is that XXX stated that Blemain are not obliged to comply with the law and intend to 'have us thrown out' of our house next week. I would be grateful if you could clarify your position in writing in case I have misunderstood.
List all the points they made, and standby for the backpedalling answer.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sequenci

It relates to a secured loan. My husband got into arrears, didn’t tell me and apparently they went to court and got a CCJ. We were recently remortgaging but the new mortgage didn’t completely cover the 1st mortgage and secured loan because of the ERC and collection costs. Blemain refused the deed of postponement even though most of then loan remaining with them would be charges. Their reason given was account conduct and this is stopping us from progressing. Basically Blemain have threatened us with eviction when they had not followed a process. We have asked for a transcript of the call.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure it is a CCJ for a secured loan? it should be a suspended possession order. Please find out ASAP and get back to me. Also, have you sent them a SAR?

 

Apologies about my posts earlier, my pc was playing up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't sent a SAR yet but will do today as I am making an official request for all data protection stuff, record of call and justification of collection costs via Cheshire mortgage Corporation and will ask for their written opinion on what I was told by the Collections Manager.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have definately told me on more than one occasion since I have become involved that it is a CCJ

 

well it is a county court process, the same as obtaining a money judgment. it's just that the process for repossession for secured lending is very different from enforcing an unsecured money judgment. if it IS a secured loan then previously i would imagine the court has agreed to a suspended possession order on terms that you meet the contractual payment of the loan agreement plus something towards the arrears.

 

if this agreement has been breached then you will need to apply to the court for another suspended possession order on the n244 form.

 

you did mention that the wrong court was used to perhaps the mortgage lender has used an incorrect court process. it could be worth calling the court and finding out what the score is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Following our conversation Monday, it appears that he checked his facts and found that we were right. They had applied for a warrant (in the last week) as we checked with the courts, but had applied to Liverpool. The application has therefore got to be transferred and they have to wait 4 weeks, so he stamped his feet and said that he wanted us out. I will pay the arrears to stop this but I am confused as they never mentioned a suspended possession order, just a CCJ. It is vital that I get all documents asap and challenge them. I just can’t believe their vindictiveness.

Link to post
Share on other sites

knowing blenheim they are a shower ob (edit my own language)but they will try every dirty trick in the book ,you must get some recording eqipment and record all conversations with these ****,when eventually i have my operations i intend bringing a serious claim against them ...so hang in their google blenheim and keep a full detailed record of everything said ,its a shame your hubby did not take them seriously had he been on here a month or so before he would now be in a position to do something and releive some of the stress on you,but dont worry on here you will get the best advice in this forum but you must act quickly good luck

patrickq1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to everyone for your help. I am pretty depressed at the moment. My husband is the type to bury his head in the sand and there has been no need to cause this. I am on annual leave and it's unbearable.

 

The original loan was 34 (they want 43) and another loan was taken out for 5 (they want 8) These were taken out in response to another mess he had got us into. He admits that he can't handle any financial responsibility and I will have to make sure that he is not even trusted to pay the milkman in future and gets help but this mess is not fair on me and the children.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The original loan was 34 (they want 43) and another loan was taken out for 5 (they want 8) These were taken out in response to another mess he had got us into. He admits that he can't handle any financial responsibility and I will have to make sure that he is not even trusted to pay the milkman in future and gets help but this mess is not fair on me and the children.

 

If he took out those loans to pay off unsecured debts you should CCA / SAR those creditors - there are bound to be bucketloads of charges to recover.

"Why CCJ when you can CCA!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Challenging; i do feel for you. Blemain are an outfit that should not (if it were up to me) be allowed to trade.

 

They've enabled you to be in this awful position just to make a profit.

 

Shylock from The Merchant of Venice comes to mind.

 

I once worked there and regret it wholeheartedly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

does this blemain company have a really bad reputation? as my mum is in the middle of getting a laon through access and apparently blemain has something to do with it after reading these posts im now slightly worried about them!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blemain are sub prime lenders, they usually lend to people with adverse credit or who have problems obtaining credit elsewhere, you would normally pay a broker who will arrange finance with sub prime lenders such as blemain, they usually secure loans on your property and if you maintain your payments on time then every thing should be ok, but if you fall into arrears then your in trouble, 3 months arrears and they will go for full reposession of your home, also if you want to redeem your loan early the redemption figures are very high, tread very carefully with this company..Gc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have sent a SAR to Bf back in June which they have replied to by sending a copy of my agreement ,T&C's a statement of account (not showing any charges) and a copy of their complaints procedure.

 

I have lodged a complaint with ICO but no reply as of yet. I have written to FISA several times they have tried to help but say they do not regulate their members.

 

I have also contacted the OFT and am awaiting a reply. Trading Standards and FOS both say it is not in their remit.

 

Blemain are a law unto themselves and it does seem that no regulatory bodies are prepared to intervene leaving us all at their mercy.

 

I really feel for you they are complete barstewards and have no respect for the law at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...