Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Yorkshire Visa now Marlin Chasing - **Ack'd AS SB'd - CLOSED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3264 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all

Well after turning the house upside down( I do have nice clean cupboards tho)I cannot find the letters to Marlin, so I have no idea what I sent to Marlin and exactly how I worded them. I do know I said the account was in dispute.

I am so mad with myself because I printed copies off until then.

 

Do I not go the statute barred route now ??

 

I know they are going to start because I keep getting phone calls, which I do not answer.

 

Thanks Guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

hi all

Well after turning the house upside down( I do have nice clean cupboards tho)I cannot find the letters to Marlin, so I have no idea what I sent to Marlin and exactly how I worded them. I do know I said the account was in dispute.

I am so mad with myself because I printed copies off until then.

 

Do I not go the statute barred route now ??

 

 

That is a great pity.

 

 

There is no harm in sending a statute barred letter along the lines of:

 

 

To The Compliance Manager

Marlin FG

 

 

Date

Ref: Use theirs:

 

 

Sir /Madam,

 

 

I refer to the alleged deb for £xxxx.xx as referenced above, please note I do Not acknowledge any liability to Marlin.

 

 

Having reviewed my credit history I have concluded that any such alleged debt is statute barred, there for I will not make any payment or offer of payment now or in the future.

 

 

Marlin will now confirm that this matter is closed.

 

 

Used signed for post check delivery date:

 

I know they are going to start because I keep getting phone calls, which I do not answe

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Brigadier.

 

If it goes to court because they don't agree, what happens if they produce the letters that I sent and theres something on them I shouldn't have said. Don't want a CCJ after all this time. I was fighting on the "application form and the t&c's" and the way YB tried altering the application form( by cutting off the heading "application form" so it looked like a credit agreement).

 

My husband agrees with you because we want it out of the way now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Brigadier.

 

If it goes to court because they don't agree, what happens if they produce the letters that I sent and theres something on them I shouldn't have said. Don't want a CCJ after all this time. I was fighting on the "application form and the t&c's" and the way YB tried altering the application form( by cutting off the heading "application form" so it looked like a credit agreement).

 

My husband agrees with you because we want it out of the way now.

Hi alamand, it is a case of prodding the sleeping dog, if they have anything to dispute the SB claim let's get it out in the open, it can then be challenged. Mysterious payments of £1 or £10 that just happen to be the fees for CCA requests or SARs are the most likely things to crop up.

 

 

The app form trick is quite common but I have not seen one modified in this way for a long time.

 

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have checked the balance and it is still the same so that should be fine,

I will wait for their next letter then, as I didn't respond to their last one.

1 more question, I send what you have put and not the SB one??

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have checked the balance and it is still the same so that should be fine,

I will wait for their next letter then, as I didn't respond to their last one.

1 more question, I send what you have put and not the SB one??

It is your choice as to which you send I am no lover of template letters for this particular subject.

 

 

I go by results.

 

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brig,

 

Well letter received asking for income/expenditure and phone message left from Marlin.

 

I have written your version and it will be in the post tomorrow. Signed for of course.

 

I have checked experian and noddle and no default or anything from Marlin or YB, in fact YB did not put anything at all on all 3 credit reference agency's even at the beginning, which I find strange.

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO it will be SB'd

 

the FOS decision makes no odds.

 

they are just trying it on.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brig,

 

Well letter received asking for income/expenditure and phone message left from Marlin.

 

I have written your version and it will be in the post tomorrow. Signed for of course.

 

I have checked experian and noddle and no default or anything from Marlin or YB, in fact YB did not put anything at all on all 3 credit reference agency's even at the beginning, which I find strange.

 

 

 

Good morning Alamand.

 

 

I agree with dx, Marlin have been chasing a raft of SB and unenforceable debts some have been seen on here but I think it's the tip of the iceberg.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hi every one

I received a reply stating that the acc is indeed statute barred n the matter is now closed.

Thanks everyone for your help.

 

Sorry I'm late with reply but when I have been logging on the site on my comp, this thread is not showing up. I have logged in through my phone, 1st time ever, and it's now here. Very very strange.

 

Once again thanks to everyone.

Alamand

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...