Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Norwich Union. Advice required.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6110 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Becca

Firstly can I say how fab it is to find you on this site!

My property was flooded last Friday with the flash flood rain. So far insurance Co have been extremely helpful in paying out emergency funds for hotel and trying to get restorator and loss adjustor booked in what can only be described as bedlam for insurance companies!

My question is that I have been contacted by the restroration company and without even seeing the damage they have instructed me to bag up all clothing that was affected so it can be picked up for dry cleaning next week. I probably have over 200 items of clothing and some bedding that has been sitting in sewage water for over a week. I asked them how they could guarantee they will be as good as new without seeing items first. I was told by NU that they (restoration co) would go through everything and determine what could be saved and what couldn’t…… now it seems they don’t want to do this groundwork but just send everything to dry cleaners after I have bagged it all up.

I would rather ask NU to replace smaller items which didn’t cost much as a lump sum and only put in the more delicate/expensive items into dry cleaning to see if they can be restored as I’m getting the impression that this company are trying to get the max claim out of my insurance. I’m worried that if they can’t restore all items I will then have to claim for replacements anyway but they will still be quids in and this amount will be part of my contents total.! :x

I’m not comfortable with being told I have no choice by this restoration company and having read on the government website re flooding their advice is to dispose of any soft furnishings, clothes affected by flood water esp if the water came up from the drains/sewers and has been left for over a few days.

Any advice would be appreciated in this really stressful time as I’m feeling bullied by this company and I’m hoping to report this to NU and sort something out with them as they have been so helpful so far..

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Aviva Support

I've PM'd you hun!

We need a little bit more info so we can get in touch with you and the restoration company.

 

Becca

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Becca

 

I have another querie (I know, I'm a natural worrier!)... I have checked on the NU website which says the following :

 

"As an approximate guide, if you were to turn your home upside down, everything that fell out would be your contents, and most of what remains would be buildings. "

 

Does this mean that walls and flooring can be claimed from my building insurance rather than my contents? Floors are wood so are therefore integrated into the building and obviously the walls are part of the building structure.

 

Any advice would again be appreciated.

 

Rgds

 

Sue

Link to post
Share on other sites

p.s restoration company attended today and have advised that clothing that has been sitting in the water should be disposed off.. I think the drycleaning was more for items that have been exposed rather than direct contact. Phew!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Aviva Support

Hi Hi

 

Glad you got that sorted and your mind is at rest. In terms of buildings/contents distinction, what you've said makes sense to me... but I will make 100% sure for you when back in the office!

 

Have fab weekend

Becca

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd imagine walls would come under Buildings cover. With regards to flooring, many years ago my Mum's washing machine leaked all over the floor and damaged the lino, so she had to claim on her NU Contents policy to have new lino put down. So carpets/lino is considered as Contents, but the actual floorboards would probably come under Buildings cover.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So to have them replasted due to flooding should come out of buildings rather than contents or would this be considered a wall covering? I'm also going to query built in units as I have read on this site that anything that cannot be removed without damaging the item would be considered integrated into the building.. Also think Insurance Ombudsman covered that point too. If I moved I couldn't take them with me without damaging them so effectively they are part of the building...

Link to post
Share on other sites

update: Spoke to NU yesterday and they have confirmed that walls, flooring, electrics, fitted units will all come under building.

 

Spoke to restoration company and they are going to give me a price for dry cleaning, sanitation and repair based on the details I have sent over to them.

 

Feel more in control of where my money is going now and releived that restoration company were very helpful and accomodating this morning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Aviva Support

Glad you feel more in control than before, if you need me anymore just give me an email.

Becca

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Becca. Restoration co probably assumed I had high insurance, when I explained it was severly limited for contents they agreed it would be beneficial to work out what was cheaper, repair or replace.

 

Thanks for your help, just knowing that someone is on here checking our claims is reassuring.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick update... Got loss adjuster for contents coming out tmr. They did want to dispose of items but said that I would prefer to do this myself when the work is being done and skips are available outside my flat. In the meantime items can stay out in the garden. Thanks to another thread on here I would have agreed without much thought for how much this would have cost so hopefully have saved some of my claim on that.

Buildings adjuster coming out in 2 weeks to ascertain what work should be done (thought this was already covered but apparently this was just a recommendation).. They wanted to start stripping out that day but advised that I was getting my own quotes so that wouldn't be happening until I had spoken to NU and agreed who was doing the work. After reading other sites and being advised off the record to get my own workman in, I would much prefer to do this so I'm happy with the quality of work and would be able to let my contractor come and go with a key. Hopefully this will all work out but feel like I'm constantly telling people they can't just assume that they can do what they like!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...