Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

pinnacle insurance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6123 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all

me and my wife took out a £10,000 loan through ocean finance last july,in december my wife got took into hospital and was off work for 16 weeks.two weeks ago ocean sent a letter about further borrowing and when we contacted them the woman was giving me loads of figures and then she mentioned insurance that we have,,my reply what insurance,, you and your wife have sickness,accident and death benefit.so we contacted pinnacle they sent out forms got them all filled in from doctor and employer,1 week later pinnacle refuses claim on grounds that wife has not got same level as cover as me (it is a joint loan) so i asked how much this insurance cost me £2000 i nearly fell off my chair i asked can i cancell this, only if i pay off the loan was there reply.

 

so i have a insurance policy thats not worth the paper its written on for 2 grand that i did not even know about could this be classed as missold.

 

thanks ian

Link to post
Share on other sites

It can't be mis sold if they told you about it in the documentation and you signed it without seeking clarification. As for the loan being conditional on insurance, I'm convinced this cannot be enforced these days, so write to the insurer saying that as the the insurance clearly isn't suitable, you are terminating cover immediately. This should bring down your payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not quite.

 

If the PPI was added to the loan without the OP's knowledge, or lumped in without separate documentation regarding it being sent for OP's perusal and confirmation, there are very good grounds indeed to seek reimbursement.

 

I would first of all ask for a copy of the original agreement showing where the insurance has been offered and accepted. IF it turns out that the cover is indeed valid, then I would read the policy very carefully to ensure that they are not telling big porkies about different levels of insurance for you and wife (simply because it sounds very convenient :rolleyes:).

 

Then, and this is the part where I agree with Buzby, cancel the insurance. There are absolutely no grounds for forcing you to keep on paying for a product which is of no use to you, and which is only a side "benefit" to the main product.

 

Let us know you get on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the 'without knowledge' bit is the problem. It may well be documented, but with only a tick box showing on the main form as 'Insurance applies/requested' or similar. It would therefore be up to the applicant to reject it - just like trying not to pay for 'priority boarding' on Ryanair flights. The issue is one of consent, not informed consent - and this is where they get you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all

the part i cant get my head around is that i was not aware that i had this insurance till only about 3 weeks at the most thats 1 year without knowing regarding the forms i cant ever recall signing insurance even if i have this cover they have gave me is not suitable as it does not cover both of us and they never explained that

 

thanx ian

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you sign up for it, the omission is yours if it forms part of the documentation - they don't HAVE to tell you anything (although it would be nice if they did). As Bookie points out, you need to start the ball rolling...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...