Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The Tax Refund Company


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2444 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A few weeks ago, I got a leaflet from my union (Amicus) about a company that specialise in checking your income tax and finding out if you are due any rebates. They are called 'Personal Taxation Services' and this is their website: https://secure.taxbuddies.com/ptsindexUnison.php?userid=9000001835&ref=unison. I assume they are cosher as the leaflet came from my trades union, but I have a very low trust level these days. So I was wondering if anyone in the CAG has any experience of dealing with this company.

 

Best regards,

buggerlugs:-?

Pre CAG:

Intelligent Finance - Judgement in default, settled in full 13/09/06 (£690.17)

Cooperative Bank - Full out of court settlement 12/12/06 (£2426.50)

Settled after first LBA - now that's what I call cooperative!

 

Since Join CAG:

BarclayCard - Full settlement including court fees, interest and cost! 29/03/06 (763.93)

It only took 6 months!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, last year i received my usual magazine from unison, and inside was a leaflet from a company offering you tax back, ( sorry, but i cant remember the name of the company but the one you have mentioned certainly sounds familiar so it could be the same one ).

they asked about previous jobs, and if i had a uniform to launder myself etc.

the way it works is........

they get your permission and approach the inland revenue and check what payments you have made over the past xxyears, and somehow work out what you are entitled to. eg... if you do have a uniform from work that you have to wash and iron without any cash help from your employer then you are entitled to £45 or £50 per year knocked off your tax bill, ( its unbelievable how many people know nothimg about this ).

also, if they find that you have paid too much then they get it back for you.

now, what they do is normally they take a cut, a rather large cut usually about 60%, so for every pound they get back for you, they keep 60p out off it.

you can look at this in two ways,

1- they have just made x amount of cash out of you and sent you the change, or

2- they have just got you x amount of pounds, which you probably didnt know you were entitled to and probably wouldnt have claimed, so in that case, so what if they have made a bit.

dont forget, that you can also pass on your partners details, and again, if they wear uniforms, then they too also get the reduction, ( you will notice this by looking at your tax code, as it will alter to accomodate the change. on top of this we also passed on a copy of the leaflet to a friend who also claimed quite a substantial amount back and again, got the laundry reduction.

basically it,s up to you. do you decide they are making cash out of you, or do you decide that they are getting you some.

buggerlugs, it,s over to you.

hope this helps, but let me know how you get on ok

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need to use a company to claim these allowances, contact your local tax office and ask them the send you the form, complete it including laundry costs, professional subscriptions, journal subscriptions, tights and shoes costs (nurses) and they will sort it :)

Poppynurse :)

 

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your advice bazak1 and poppynurse,

 

The company that I was considering using charge 40% commission which seemed a little steep to me. However, I have since found another company on the web whose charges start from 18%.

 

I am going to try and work out if I am due a rebate myself and failing that I may use one of these tax rebate companies. I have got all of my P60s for the last six or seven years, but even so, I don't think its a particularly simple job. For instance, you need to know the various tax bands that were in force each year and the tax rules have changed over the last six years for instance, as a parent I used to get a tax allowance, but this was phased out and now I recieve tax credits instead. Also, I don't have any laundry costs, professional subscriptions or journal subscriptions that I can claim for.

 

Regards,

buggerlugs:)

Pre CAG:

Intelligent Finance - Judgement in default, settled in full 13/09/06 (£690.17)

Cooperative Bank - Full out of court settlement 12/12/06 (£2426.50)

Settled after first LBA - now that's what I call cooperative!

 

Since Join CAG:

BarclayCard - Full settlement including court fees, interest and cost! 29/03/06 (763.93)

It only took 6 months!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The company charging just 18% are called Refunds Direct: https://www.refundsdirect.co.uk/survey/. However, I have also found that the Citizens Advice Bureau publish the tax rates and allowances for the past six years on their website:

 

Income tax rates

 

Income tax allowance: amounts

 

So you can check your tax payments yourself and potentially save yourself some money. I did it this way and I have worked out that I am due a rebate of £300 for the 2005/2006 tax year.

 

Best regards,

buggerlugs:)

Pre CAG:

Intelligent Finance - Judgement in default, settled in full 13/09/06 (£690.17)

Cooperative Bank - Full out of court settlement 12/12/06 (£2426.50)

Settled after first LBA - now that's what I call cooperative!

 

Since Join CAG:

BarclayCard - Full settlement including court fees, interest and cost! 29/03/06 (763.93)

It only took 6 months!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just give a call to your local tax office - this should be on your payslip and they will be happy to tell you what is and is not allowed to be claimed for a tax rebate.

I am annoyed that some unions are allowingthese private companies to advertise to make such large profits on tax rebates as with 25,000 job cuts planned in HMRC by 2008 it should be incouraging the use of the public sector to justify why these jobs should be kept.

After all, we are all taxpayers and we have already paid for this service!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I found this an interesting read! I have had a rebate every year for the past 3 for around £300 however, the questionaire at the above site suggests you can claim back loss of money invested in a company. does anyone know about this and where the relevant info is on HM Revenue & Customs?

 

Tom

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

There is a service to claim back these types of refunds and a guide on commercial link removed

 

There is also a free calculator to work out what your refund might be.

Edited by slick132
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

hi guys,

 

There is another company out there that does tax refunds. Great website and great bunch of guys.

 

They have reasonable rates and are very professional.

 

It does pay to seek advice sometimes. They do most of the work.

 

commercial website address removed

 

good luck guys

Edited by slick132
Link to post
Share on other sites

please be very careful when using a company to help you claim tax

 

My husband used a firm called tax back ( 10 years ago)

 

they made claims on his behalf going back 6 years we received substantial rebates and paid them a commission

we then received a letter from the inland revenue asking us to make an appointment to go and see them it became very clear during the interview that it was the firm tax back they were investigating and we were informed that if tax back had claimed mileage allowances ETC that he was not entitled to we would have to pay all the money not due to us back

 

Thankfully we were OK

 

as said on here you can do it yourself

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Hello

I used them and it has been over a year and I moved, but I never got the cheque. Because you cannot get a hold of the company I was wondering what I should do in order to get the tax rebate they has 'sorted out' for me. I rang HM Revenues & Customs and they said because a third party did it on my behalf there is nothing I can do. I did not realise this was basically a [problem] because it came through my trade union magazine.

 

So is there anyway I can get my cheque/money? Any help needed. I basically had to move from my old flat and now have not had access to the post for over at least a year and a half, so it has probably been binned and as I said I cannot get a hold of them to ask them to re-send to new address.

 

Please someone help with some advice!

 

Thanks

 

T_d

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

I used them and it has been over a year and I moved, but I never got the cheque. Because you cannot get a hold of the company I was wondering what I should do in order to get the tax rebate they has 'sorted out' for me. I rang HM Revenues & Customs and they said because a third party did it on my behalf there is nothing I can do. I did not realise this was basically a [problem] because it came through my trade union magazine.

 

So is there anyway I can get my cheque/money? Any help needed. I basically had to move from my old flat and now have not had access to the post for over at least a year and a half, so it has probably been binned and as I said I cannot get a hold of them to ask them to re-send to new address.

 

Please someone help with some advice!

 

Thanks

 

T_d

Contact your Union for legal advice. It should be free especially as it was included in their brochure which indicated endorsement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...

Like one of the above as the information arrived via my union GMB so I thought this was a good thing to check as the union recommended it especially as I went on flexible retirement almost 2 years ago but luckily for me I did not have my work P60 to hand due to being on long-term sickness and I got notification from HMRC within a fortnight of contacting the company that I was owed £900 which I could ask for online (their security is very good) so I cancelled my agreement with whoever this company is which saved me over £300. I believe these companies pay a fee to the unions to pass their literature onto members - I think this is disgusting for any union to treat their members as a cash cow.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...