If you're threatened with account closure from Allioance & Leicester, and wish to challenge it, there is an interesting clause in the "Unfair Terms In Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999". Essentially, ikt means that if a term in a contract is deemed to be unfair, then it 'shall not be binding'. Also, it says the rest of the contract remains in place.
I don't know what the best mechanism is yet for actually challenging it, but I'm sure there will be plenty of people out there with suggestions.
Effect of unfair term
8.
(1)An unfair term in a contract concluded with a consumer by a seller or supplier shall not bebinding on the consumer.
(2)The contract shall continue to bind the parties if it is capable of continuing in existence without the unfair term.
Similar Threads:


Reply With Quote


