Patricia Pearl - Small Claims Procedure - A Practical Guide


An excellent guide for the layperson in how to use the County Court - a must if you are intending to start a claim.

£19.99 + £1.50 (P&P)




Last Will and Testament Kit


Make a legally valid will without the fuss and expense of a solicitor - includes a full step-by-step guide.

£9.99 + £1.50 (P&P)

BAILIFFS - The Law and Your Rights

Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.

The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.

£13.95 + £2.00 (P&P)


Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg. 05783665 in the UK

reg. office:
923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE



+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: thorx vs Mint

  1. #1
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    thorx Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    26

    Default thorx vs Mint (offer received; reject or accept as partial refund?)

    While I'm waiting for my claim against HSBCicon to go to court I've decided to go after charges applied to my Mint credit card....

    I already had copies of all statements so used them to build my charges spreadsheet last night. The total inc interesticon on the charges came to a total of approx £480.

    I used the credit card lbaicon in the templates directory after modifying it to resemble a preliminary letter. I sent it off special delivery today...

    So now we'll see how long it goes before they make an offer.

    I've read through most of the other Mint threads but struggled to find a pattern to how they behave when faced with someone reclaiming their charges. I wouldn't mind getting the whole thing wrapped up before it gets to MCOL, not that I'm worried about going to court, but it's just a pain in the backside having to spend so long preparing documentation etc when they could just have refunded the charges straight away (as they are likely to do so in the end regardless).

    Any reason why there isn't a sub-forum for Mint by the way?

    Similar Threads:

  2. #2
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    thorx Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    26

    Default Re: thorx vs Mint

    I've had a request for a copy of the modified credit card LBA I used as a prelim letter so here goes..

    thorx
    -----------------

    [YOUR ADDRESS]

    Mint

    Cards Customer Services
    PO BOX 6050
    Southend on Sea
    SS99 1WL

    [DATE]


    REQUEST FOR REPAYMENT OF CHARGES

    Dear Sir/Madam,

    CARD/ACCOUNT NUMBER: [CARD NUMBER]


    I now understand that the regime of fees which you have been applying to my account in relation to late fees and over limit charges, are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations.

    I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

    I am frankly shocked that you have operated my account in this way as I had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise as my fiduciary.

    I calculate that you have taken £XXX plus £XXX which you have charged me in interesticon for the sums which you have taken - Total £XXX. I enclose a schedule of the charges which I am claiming with this letter.


    I hope that you will enter into a sincere dialogue with me about this matter and I am writing this letter to you on the assumption that you will prefer to do this than merely respond with standard letters and leaflets.

    I will give you 14 days to reply to me accepting, unconditionally, my request in principle and letting me know a date by which I will receive payment.


    If you do not respond, or you do not respond positively, within this time period, I shall send you a letter before actionicon giving you a further 14 days in which to reflect. I believe that these targets are more than sufficient for a large company such as yours with dedicated staff and departments.

    After that, there will be no further communication from me and I shall issue a claim at the expiry of the second deadline.


    Yours faithfully,

    [signatureicon]

    [PRINTED NAME]



  3. #3
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    mr elmo Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    79

    Default Re: thorx vs Mint

    Thanks

    Good luck with the claim


  4. #4
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    thorx Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    26

    Default Re: thorx vs Mint

    Received offer letter yesterday. I must say they are quick to deal with incoming mail. So well done Mint/RBSicon...

    Anyway. The offer was for approx £110 and it explicitly said it was the difference between what I was charged and the current charge (£12).

    So...

    Reject or accept as partial? Most people seem to reject (makes it more transparent I guess), but is there a good reason not to accept a partial refund and then continue the process including MCOL (if needed) for the remainder?

    lbaicon isn't due to go out for another 6 days so I've got time to prepare a strategy..


  5. #5
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Chris__ Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    42

    Default Re: thorx vs Mint

    From what I have seen, if you reject the offer they do not improve on it even after sending a lbaicon so if you are going to go for a full refund you are likely to end up claiming through the courts. I am a few weeks ahead of you so can let you know how things progress


  6. #6
    Classic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a contribution
    isidore Informative isidore Informative isidore Informative isidore's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Aug 2006
    I am in
    South Wales
    Posts
    1,616

    Default Re: thorx vs Mint

    Whilst most rejected offers aren't bettered upon, each claim is weighed up by the bank in terms of whether or not it is worth their while going to court, or whether it would be in their best interesticon to settle. A small amount like this, would have more chance of being settled in full prior to court (not saying it would, just might).

    Rejecting and accepting as partial are one of the same. You are rejecting the offer as full settlement but would accept it as partial settlement.

    If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

    Always start with the User guide!
    Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

    RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

  7. #7
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    thorx Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    26

    Default Re: thorx vs Mint

    So my lbaicon is due out today and I still haven't posted my rejection letter. I know...slow, but there was nothing to gain by being quick!

    Anyway, as I'm due to send both letters at the same time do you think sending them in the same envelope is okay? Or two small envelopes in a bigger one. It would save me approx £5, but whether it is acceptable in legal terms is another thing.

    Opinions please...

    thanks


  8. #8
    Classic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a contribution
    isidore Informative isidore Informative isidore Informative isidore's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Aug 2006
    I am in
    South Wales
    Posts
    1,616

    Default Re: thorx vs Mint

    Why don't you amend the lbaicon to incorporate the fact that you have received their offer and are rejecting it??

    If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

    Always start with the User guide!
    Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

    RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

  9. #9
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    thorx Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    26

    Default Re: thorx vs Mint

    I guess that would work. Seems a bit pointless sending two letters, especially when the rejection letter is only two lines of text....

    thanks for your help!


  10. #10
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    thorx Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    26

    Default Re: thorx vs Mint

    As many others have done I only received a repeat of the initial offer after sending the lbaicon. Should I reject this offer as well? I did say in the LBA that I wouldn't be in touch again so I'm guessing it isn't needed.

    Anyway, MCOL next. I've been looking around for some particulars of claim, but the only ones in the template library apply to current accounts. So if any of you nice people could point me in the right direction it would be appreciated.

    thanks


  11. #11
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Chris__ Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    42

    Default Re: thorx vs Mint

    Hi, this is what I used (which worked)

    "The Claimant, a customer of the Defendant claims that between 00/00/00 and 00/00/00 the Defendant debited (number of) charges from the
    Claimant's credit card account 5460xxxxxxxxxxxx. The claimant believes that the charges are an unfair penalty under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 as they are a disproportionately high sum in compensation compared to the cost of the purported breach and that Under the law of penalties, the charges are an unlawful extravagant penalty. The claimant requests the refund of these charges being £000.00 plus contractual interesticon of 16.9% compounded. The interest is an additional £000.00 The Claimant has written to the Defendant on a number of occasions in order to try to resolve this situation but now feels that they have no other course of action left. The Claimant therefore respectfully asks the court to enter judgment in their favour for a total of £000.00

    The address to send it to is:-

    Royal Bank of Scotlandicon Plc
    RBSicon Litigation
    1 Princes Street
    London
    EC2R 8PB

    Hope that this helps


  12. #12
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    thorx Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    26

    Default Re: thorx vs Mint

    thanks Chris. looks good to me. i was going to use a slightly modified version of the one in the template library, but yours looks better suited (and appropriate as it has been tried and tested).


  13. #13
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Chris__ Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    42

    Default Re: thorx vs Mint

    Please bear in mind that I am not legally qualified so this is not guaranteed to be 100% technically correct but it did work for my claim. Good luck!


  14. #14
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    thorx Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    26

    Default Re: thorx vs Mint

    yeah no worries!



Browsealoud
Video Tour



Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE