Patricia Pearl - Small Claims Procedure - A Practical Guide


An excellent guide for the layperson in how to use the County Court - a must if you are intending to start a claim.

£19.99 + £1.50 (P&P)




Last Will and Testament Kit


Make a legally valid will without the fuss and expense of a solicitor - includes a full step-by-step guide.

£9.99 + £1.50 (P&P)

BAILIFFS - The Law and Your Rights

Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.

The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.

£13.95 + £2.00 (P&P)


Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg. 05783665 in the UK

reg. office:
923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE



+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2
1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21
  1. #1
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Chris__ Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    42

    Default Chris v MINT (New Case)

    Hi

    I claimed a repayment of charges which came to £220 and have been offered £80. I have rejected this and sent the letter before actionicon which produced the same offer of £80. I am now about to start the Money Claim Online process. Can any of you tell me how they have got on at this stage and beyond? I would be very surprised if RBSicon would contest the case given the small amount.

    Thanks

    Similar Threads:

  2. #2
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    tennis star Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2007
    I am in
    leicestershire
    Posts
    19

    Default Re: Chris v MINT (New Case)

    my claim is for considerably more but i recently filed MCOL - RBSicon acknowledged and asked for 28 days and have just submitted a defence (27th june ) - through their solicitors Cobbetts who are now asking for more info - on searching the site this is not uncommon but it is a bit scary!

    good luck


  3. #3
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Chris__ Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    42

    Default Re: Chris v MINT (New Case)

    Which address should I use for MCOL? So far I have been writing to Customer Services in Southend? Thanks


  4. #4
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    tennis star Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2007
    I am in
    leicestershire
    Posts
    19

    Default Re: Chris v MINT (New Case)

    I used the address of my local bank (my claim is against RBSicon bank), if I were you i'd continue to use the one you have.

    good luck


  5. #5
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    ADAMS Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    I am in
    manchester
    Posts
    30

    Default Re: Chris v MINT (New Case)

    Hi Chris,just wondering what address you used for your dpa letter,just going to go after mint after thinking about it for some time,cheers.


  6. #6
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Chris__ Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    42

    Default Re: Chris v MINT (New Case)

    I used the Customer Services Dept which is:

    Cards Customer Services
    PO Box 6050
    Southend on Sea
    SS99 1WL

    They replied reasonably quickly but from my experience so far (and that of others looking through this site) is that they initially offer to repay the difference between their old charges and the new £12.00 charge, so this will equate to an offer to pay back about one third of your claim. I rejected this offer and then sent the letter before actionicon which came back with the same offer. I am now about to submit a claim through MCOL. It would guess that you will automatically get the same first offer that I and others have had, but I have not seen any how MINT (RBoS) have reacted once a claim to the coursts has been submitted; any links would be appreciated!


  7. #7
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Chris__ Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    42

    Default Re: Chris v MINT (New Case)

    I'm a bit confused about what interesticon to add to my court claim. Could some one please advise??

    -Initially I simply asked MINT for the charges to be repaid without any interest.
    -Can I at this stage now add contractual interest and compound it (I was going to use 16.9% which others seem to have used)?
    -The account was closed a couple of years ago so do I calculate up to the closure date or up to today?
    -After calculating this, can I then also add the 8% statutory interest?

    Your words of wisdom would be appreciated!


  8. #8
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    thorx Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    26

    Default Re: Chris v MINT (New Case)

    Hi Chris

    I've just sent off my prelim letter to Mint today.

    Like you I'm going to add contractual interesticon (16.9%) but you don't do this until you go to court. I would say you claim up until today as they still haven't paid you the money back so it's only fair they are charged the interest until they finally refund you.

    No you cannot charge the statutory 8% on top of that. It's either contractual or statutory.

    Good luck!


  9. #9
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Chris__ Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    42

    Default Re: Chris v MINT (New Case)

    Well, I have submitted my claim via MCOL this afternoon


  10. #10
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    colpac Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    May 2007
    Posts
    56

    Default Re: Chris v MINT (New Case)

    Im at the same stage, had one offer of about a third, sent lbaicon and then got the same offer, so doing MCOL next week as soon as im paid.

    Abbey - Claiming £4,044.82 offered £4,170 - accepted

    Mint - Claiming £769.71 offered £217 - declined

    NatWest - Claiming £272

  11. #11
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Chris__ Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    42

    Default Re: Chris v MINT (New Case)

    According to the MCOL website my claim has been accepted and issued against RBoS so now they have 14 days to do something.


  12. #12
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Chris__ Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    42

    Default Re: Chris v MINT (New Case)

    I have now had an acknowledgement of the claim from the court and RBSicon have indicated that they will defend the claim.


  13. #13
    Classic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a contribution
    wednesday1867 Novitiate wednesday1867's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jan 2007
    I am in
    South Yorkshire
    Posts
    1,286

    Default Re: Chris v MINT (New Case)

    Good Luck with it Chris, i know this point has passed, but as far as i was aware, regarding the interesticon, it was only bank accounts that you had to wait for Court before adding interest, you can ask for contractual interest from the beginning of a credit card claim

    I might be wrong but i dont think i am and have claimed contractual interest from day one on all credit cards ive done


  14. #14
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Chris__ Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    42

    Default Re: Chris v MINT (New Case)

    I added contractual interesticon and with the court fee it has nearly doubled the amount of the claim. The claim has been acknowledged by RBoS and they have said that they intend to defend the claim. I can't imagine that they are going to send a solicitor out into the sticks to defend a claim for a couple of hundred quid.

    What I have struggled to find on this site is examples of what MINT (RBoS) have done previously with smaller claims like this. Has anyone found any examples??


  15. #15
    Classic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a contribution
    isidore Informative isidore Informative isidore Informative isidore's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Aug 2006
    I am in
    South Wales
    Posts
    1,616

    Default Re: Chris v MINT (New Case)

    Best place to look is the RBSicon successes forum, once there, click SEARCH THIS FORUM and search for MINT. Should be plenty of other claims in there

    If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

    Always start with the User guide!
    Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

    RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

  16. #16
    Classic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a contribution
    isidore Informative isidore Informative isidore Informative isidore's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Aug 2006
    I am in
    South Wales
    Posts
    1,616

    Default Re: Chris v MINT (New Case)

    Just to follow on from Wed's point, I wasn't aware you had to wait until court to claim contractual on a bank account?

    It's statutory interesticon that can only be applied at court stage - the 8%.

    If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

    Always start with the User guide!
    Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

    RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

  17. #17
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Chris__ Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    42

    Default Re: Chris v MINT (New Case)

    To be honest I am not 100% sure either way. From what I have read, I understand that you can only claim Statutory interesticon (8%) at the court stage but that you can claim contractual interest when making the initial claim from the bank or credit provider but that you cannot claim both. With my claim against MINT I added intrerest at the prevailing rate which was 16.9% and compounded it from the date the charge was applied up until the month of the claim.


  18. #18
    Classic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a contribution
    isidore Informative isidore Informative isidore Informative isidore's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Aug 2006
    I am in
    South Wales
    Posts
    1,616

    Default Re: Chris v MINT (New Case)

    Yes that's correct, the point I was making was that you can do this with bank accounts too.

    If my post has been useful, tip my scales and let me know

    Always start with the User guide!
    Stuck with RBS charges? Click here!!

    RBS CA1 £2794 SETTLED!!! RBS CA2 £503 SETTLED!!! HBOS CC £498 SETTLED!!! Barclaycard £705 (with CCI) ONGOING!!! NATWEST CA ONGOING!!! LLOYDS CA x 2, CC, LOAN ONGOING!!! HFC LOAN ONGOING!!!

  19. #19
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Chris__ Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    42

    Default Re: Chris v MINT (New Case)

    Nearly there, received a cheque which was meant to be in full settlement of charges plus interesticon and the court fee. Unfortunatley somebody at RBoS can't add up and it is £20 short so I will be asking for that as well before withdrawing the claim from the court.


  20. #20
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    tennis star Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2007
    I am in
    leicestershire
    Posts
    19

    Default Re: Chris v MINT (New Case)

    chris - forgive me if this is a silly question but did RBSicon submit a defence? how come they seem to have settled so quickly - I've got untill 31st july to submit allocation questionaire - did yours get this far or not?

    thanks



Browsealoud
Video Tour



Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE