Thread: defence struck out (barclays)

i recently returned my allocation questionnaire to my local court (20.06.07), and yesterday received a letter from the court saying:

1.The defence is struck out as an abuse of process and contrary to CPR 1.3.

2.this matter be listed for assessment of damages at 10 am on 3rd July (at my local court).

i take the ,defence being struck out as a good thing -but am confused as to why i still have to go to court, furthermore will i have to take any information, bar details of the money that i am looking to recoup ?

Similar Threads:

• Bob & Wendy - V - Barclays *DEFENCE STRUCK OUT!*
• RFisher33 vs Barclays *ANOTHER DEFENCE STRUCK OUT!*
• Defence struck out

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk.../barclays-bank

Post your thread in the Barclays section..You are just a phone call away from your "cheque being in the post"

And congratulattions !!!!!!!!

i recently returned my allocation questionnaire to my local court (20.06.07), and yesterday received a letter from the court saying:

1.The defence is struck out as an abuse of process and contrary to CPR 1.3.

2.this matter be listed for assessment of damages at 10 am on 3rd July (at my local court).

i take the ,defence being struck out as a good thing -but am confused as to why i still have to go to court, furthermore will i have to take any information, bar details of the money that i am looking to recoup ?

i was claiming £630 (plus costs). my court is Tameside county court.

do you think i'll need any information when in court tomorrow apart from bank statements with the charges on ?

is it normal to still have to appear in court after the defence has been struck out ?

what is meant by "assessment of damages" -will it not just be the £630

i initially used the bbc letter, then followed this up with procedings via the small claims court. i am only looking to get my charges back i have not claimed for interest (although with hindsight....). on my allocation questionnaire which is the last thing i filled in a asked the court to enter judgement in my favour for £630.

on account of having not seen any other claims following this path i'm a little nervous that i'll be under-prepared if the judge asks anything other than the amount i'm claiming. is it possible that he'll award damages for less than the amount that i'm claiming?

i just find all of this a bit wierd

I am so watching this with the utmost of interest..

I think £ 100000 would just about cover my assessment of damages..

There is no chance you will get awarded LESS than you have claimed..

Could somebody please advise as to what they think needs to be done in court tomorrow..

in section g (form n149) i put little apart from claiming £630, and that the banks were unlawful in their charges.

i dont know what pm a mod means (sorry)

tameside county court

i used this info from the bbc website

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/h...12_06_form.pdf

i enclosed copies of statements and that's about it

i dont know what pm a mod means (sorry)


This means private message a moderator. They will help you I'm sure

Good luck

Will Do Many Thanks

Perhaps Saintly or other Site Helper could PM a mod if nec'y and mention threads for Harpoon.

went to court, 2 minute hearing. Barclays apparently didn't mount a defence and never have dona at my local court (and neaither has any other bank from what the judge was saying), he was surprised that they hadn't already settled - believes they must have overlooked me.

To receive £630 + £80 fee within 14 days

many thanks to all who have helped

(sorry i've had two threads running - not quite got my head around all this)