Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Critical illness help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6144 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi new to this.

 

Just wondered after browsing for a good while what anyone thinks of my situation and if anyone has any comments or similar experiences.

 

At work in march this year I started to feel a bit weak, walking predominantly to the right and eyes went a bit funny.

I left my car at work and got a lift to A&E to get checked out. Was admitted straight away and spent 2 weeks undergoing tests. I had an MRI which I was told that in technicians report suggested MS. I had a lumbar puncture (joyful experience!) which further indicated it (proteins?) and was put on a 5 day IV methyl prethisdolone or something like that. My walk was wierd, my eysight fuzzy and balance all over the place. I started to feel better and was discharged. My consultant from hospital said he was pleased with my progress but he said it 'MS'. He seemed very sure and said he had done a lot of work in this field before. He referred me to meet a neurologist which I am still waiting to see. Sure of his conviction I put in a claim for my critical illness cover. It has a 6 month see how it develops condition.

Been off work for 5 months now ang hopefully gearing up for a return to work soon. My sick notes have always said 'probable' MS from GP. This is worrying me now with my claim as I thought the consultant said it was a definite dx. He states this on another form completed but again GP says 'PROBABLE'

This money is going to seriously affect how my family continue to live and getting very anxious now. I phone company every week for update and they are forever waiting on medical reports.

I am also worried that going back to work may have an impact on claim. Since my hospital admission I have not sought any further treatment by a doctor, thats not to say I have had some bad times at home.

 

Sorry to go on, just worried, anxious and confused.

 

Any thoughts

jamjo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. I'm sorry to hear of your current health problems and I hope you get better.

 

I just found this link

 

Multiple Sclerosis Society Website - Welcome to the MS Society - Critical illness

 

Is MS covered by all critical illness policies?

 

All critical illness policies cover heart attacks, cancer and strokes, but not all cover MS, although it is one of four other core critical illnesses as defined by the Association of British Insurers (ABI). Those policies that do cover MS will pay out following a definite diagnosis by a Consultant Neurologist, as long as you have current impairment of motor or sensory function which has lasted for at least six months continuously.

 

In 1999, the Association of British Insurers (ABI) published model definitions of critical illness conditions. These represent minimum standards of cover, to which all their members have to adhere. Policies taken out since then with an ABI member will either offer this minimum level of cover or better. More details on this model definition of MS, and on those for other conditions, can be found in the Consumer Information zone on the ABI website ( www.abi.org.uk).

 

Check the small print to find out if it covers MS, and under what circumstances it will pay out.

 

There may be restrictions or exclusions which can prevent a claim. Some insurers will not pay out if the condition is diagnosed within three or six months of the start of the policy. You will also need to survive for a period of time, usually between 14 and 30 days, after an illness is diagnosed, but this should not be an issue for people diagnosed with MS.

 

If you do qualify, the money paid out can be a godsend, easing financial pressures at a time when you need to be concentrating on your health.

 

I hope this helps to clear some things up for you. From what I read though, as you've not had a definite diagnosis from a neurologist yet it is unlikely at this time that the insurers will pay out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...