Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post Office scandal expert Moorhead predicts solicitor strike-offs Richard Moorhead, professor of law and professional ethics at the University of Exeter and a prolific writer on the Horizon scandal, said it was ‘highly likely’ that people would be removed from the profession. He added that he also expects one or two individuals to face criminal prosecutions. He was ‘cautiously supportive’ of the Solicitors Regulation Authority's position of waiting until the public inquiry has finished before taking any decisions on disciplinary proceedings, saying the regulator has been doing a lot of investigatory work behind the scenes. But Moorhead said the SRA should provide ‘greater clarity and detail’ about what it is doing currently.   Professor Richard Moorhead predicts strike-offs over Post Office Horizon scandal | Law Gazette WWW.LAWGAZETTE.CO.UK Lawyers have been 'everywhere' in the scandal, Professor Richard Moorhead tells legal ethics conference.
    • If this goes to court, you'll be asked to declare your earnings. Any fine is a percentage of what you earn per week.  
    • Hi Dx, HB can you share the link of Tireddodo's case thread , may be i can learn something from there?  
    • As i don't have any mitigating circumstances other than trying to save pennies, will they fine me to the maximum? What is the maximum fine they will impose? I honestly don't know how many times i use it.  I will get a criminal record which means i can't find another job? Will they prosecute my partner?   
    • Yes. They won't inform your employer but you may need to. You need to check what it says iin your employment contract. I don't think it usually causes huge problems for most people. HB
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claim declined in full


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5894 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I got burgled in January this year and my claim has been declined in full. They say that the items i listed as being stolen in a phone call made a few days later didn't match up to the items on the "official" claim. This said telephone conversation was not a matter of fact conversation at all. I was just mearly saying that I'd had such and such taken and when are the loss adjusters coming out to see me. It was not a list of things that had been stolen if you understand.

 

I now have to wait 8 weeks for the appeal to go through. Any advice? Can they do this or are they trying it on?

 

It's bad enough being burgled without this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hard luck - welcome to the club. You will win but it may take a while

 

The sad fact is that if the insurance company drag their heals there is very little you can do to speed the process up.

 

It is worth acquainting yourself with the various sections of the FSA handbook that relate to insurance claims, specifically "ICOB" and "DISP".

 

If you have not already done so make a formal complaint - preferrably in writing - and make it absolutely clear that it is a formal complaint. I would make it plain that you are complaining not only about the decision but also that the way in which they reached that decision was unreasonable. That means that even when they reverse their decision they will still need to justify their actions.

 

They should acknowledge that in writing within 5 days, and that acknowledgement must include details of their complaints progress.

 

Eventually they will either have to send you a "final" letter or the 8 weeks will elapse at which time you can take this to FOS - however that will also be a very slow process.

 

Once you get to that stage I think you should be claiming compensation for the inconvenience and taking it to FOS on that basis. It is important that these companies realise that they cannot delay claims unreasonably

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

You say in the telephone call registering the claim you had such and such taken, but it was not a list of items that had been stolen.

 

Am I right in thinking you are claiming for more than what was originally on the call, or the items in the call weren't stolen and you are claiming for something else?

 

If it is the former you might be ok. You need to ask whether the Insurers have applied for a police report, and what was on the police report as stolen.

 

You should be able to get at least what was on the police report and what was originally said.

 

It also depends on other things - how long after the theft was this telephone conversation. What is the value of the items on the original claim, the police report and also items noticed later?

Abbey - owed £3260 - Paid up.

 

Barclays owed £2500 - Paid up.

 

Halifax, Mint & Egg - next on the hit list

 

Dont click on the scales - I'm quite proud of my little red dot! - As the little red dot has gone - click away!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, yes it was the former, I told them that I'd had a plasma, camcorder and a bit of money stolen and when was the loss adjusters coming out to see me as I wanted to get the claim moving. It wasn't a matter of fact telephone call, neither was it listing the whole amount of items stolen. I have put an official complaint in so I recon I've got about 6 weeks left of that proccess.

 

Will I get my money? This along with other stuff going on is really damaging my health.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sympathise with you - I am currently in dispute with Direct Line about a simple stolen/recovered vehicle. The fact that you are in the right does not make the process any less unpleasant.

 

Yes you will get your money - especially if you can produce receipts.

 

I suspect that many insurance companies have a policy of refusing many claims on flimsey excuses in an attempt to deter fraudulent claims.

 

Eventually if the insurance company want to deny the claim they have to be able to prove that the items were not stolen - which they clearly can't if they were.

 

They may also be able to make difficultly if there is no sign of forced entry into the house - many policies would exclude liability if you left the door open or otherwise didn't take reasonable steps to protect your property.

 

It may be worth your while submitting a S.A.R, and in it asking explicitly for any recordings that exist of the conversations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would ring the Insurance Company and ask if they have applied for the police report.

 

If they have not, then I would ask the police for a copy of the report, and then forward that to the Insurers, (as well as asking them why they have not requested this)

 

If they have, then ask them what discrepencies are there between the claim form (your exhaustive list) and the police report....

Abbey - owed £3260 - Paid up.

 

Barclays owed £2500 - Paid up.

 

Halifax, Mint & Egg - next on the hit list

 

Dont click on the scales - I'm quite proud of my little red dot! - As the little red dot has gone - click away!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just out of interest, have you had a telephone call with Halifax, where they asked you what you did around the time of noticing the theft?? And then more questions regarding the conditions of the items, etc.?

 

If not, then as what you are claiming for is on the police report, they have no valid reason to decline your claim. I would write to their complaints process asking for a "final decision for the purposes of the Ombudsman" At this juncture they have 2 options - either maintain the declinature (In which case you go to the FSA, and win) or they will cave and pay.

 

Good Luck

Abbey - owed £3260 - Paid up.

 

Barclays owed £2500 - Paid up.

 

Halifax, Mint & Egg - next on the hit list

 

Dont click on the scales - I'm quite proud of my little red dot! - As the little red dot has gone - click away!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Just for the record, I've had a lot of trouble with payment shield, It's a nightmare pinning down who they actually are as the E mail addresses are given as [email protected] I've had a huge complaint about the time taken to address my claim this morning. I followed the complaint procedure and didnt even get a reply, three times in a row. They won't escalate my complaint untill the first one gets through. (Scary how thick some places policies are) We had a back wall collapse into a road which has been blocked for 5 weeks- I'd suggest writing a top level complaint too- as it seems they dont focus on responding. Mention these forums too! Paymentshield - About Us - Management Team Biographies will show you who to E mail, writing is slow when time is of the essence but write AS WELL and record the delivery. The E mail for these execs is (first name).(lastname)@paymentshield.co.uk I hope the fact they publicise themselves means that they genuinely want to know about these problems to act on them, Somehow I think i might have something in my tapwater making me a little delusional there though! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...