Consumer Action Group envelope labels
You are part of a community of over 195,000 people. Let your bank know that you won't give in. Display one of our labels on your envelopes. Full description here
Sheet of 20 self-adhesive envelope labels £3.50 inc p&p
|
Do your Internet search here Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK
reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE
| | | | Do your Internet search here:-
|
Come and chat with us here (NB: External site NOT affiliated with CAG)
| | | CAG Announcements | |
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ.
You will have to register before you can post.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old? This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide Bought an extended warranty? Not satisfied?
The warranty may be an example of unfair trading
See our new Unfair Trading Guide Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out Are you a victim of unfair trading? Check it out The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regs 2008 Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | | | | | | | Residential and Commercial Lettings This is the place for both Landlords and Tenants to discuss letting issues, and share experiences. | Welcome to The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group
Before beginning to claim your bank charges be sure to read the FAQ by clicking the link above. Read it carefully and also read as much of the forum material as you can manage before you start claiming your bank charges refund.
You will have to register before you can post or view the materials which may assist you in reclaiming your penalty charges: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. Understand what you are doing and you will be able to Reclaim the Right more effectively.
Why don't you come and introduce yourself in the Welcome section at the top of the forum. Then have a look around the rest of it.
Do not post or start claiming until you have read the entire FAQ section and step by step guides and you have a good basic idea of what to do and of the layout of the forum.
Good luck claiming your bank charges. We strongly suggest that you register under a UserID and not your own name |  |
11th October 2007, 14:54
|
#1 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Customer | Oldham Council OMG this is a long drawn out one.. Two and a half years ago my local Council (Oldham) used some of the money it received to put some alley gates up at each end of the passage way to the rear of my house, which they said would increase security etc. Very nice they are too btw, However, whilst the contractors were putting up the gates they were also to remove the old surface of the road, tarmac and landscape the area. While they were doing this one of them reversed a mini digger through my back wall (if you imagine the opening to Corrie that is what the passage used to look like). The back wall they wrecked formed the outer wall to my old outhouse (shed and toilet). Instead of telling me they had hit my wall they tried to botch the job and just cemented things in place hoping i wouldnt notice. The roof to the outhouse was four of those really heavy slate slabs which if fell IMHO would have killed someone so i got them to agree to come and have a look. It took 12 months to get them to agree to take down the entire out house and put in a wooden fence, when they came round first time they made a mess of the whole thing by leaving my yard full of bricks and although i cant prove it i noticed the very valuable slate slabs had vanished. I finally managed to get the work to a satisfactory standard 22 months after the first incident. You are probably thinking in that case i shouldnt be posting on here!! Wrong. It seems that when they took down the out house and removed the old toilet that they simply put large chunks of brick down the waste pipe which has been slowly blocking my waste pipe to my house. Last month the whole toilet and waste system was blocked. I contacted the council to ask them to send the jetting team round to clear my drain as i had no idea it was related to the out house at the time and i just wanted my loo to work. I was told by the council that they dont have a budget for that kind of work so i pointed out that i was prepared to pay, i was then told that the jetting team had gone home so i pointed out that the councils own website stated they offered a 24 hour service. The following day i tried again to get the jetting team out and still nothing so i contacted my MP who contacted them and they phoned to say they would be out the next day. I emailed them a complaint saying that the treatment i endured was terrible and shouldnt happen, i had no loo or water for three days ffs. The jetting team arrived in the late afternoon so i took time off work to come and allow them access. The man from the council jetting team said it was my fault the system had blocked as the waste pipe from the old loo had caused it.. picture the scene. I got onto the council once more to really let them know what i thought and lodged a stage one complaint, they are supposed to have 15 working days to respond to this and its now 22 days. If i add up all of the time i have spent trying to sort out just the waste pipe issue its three half days holiday i have had to take plus all the phone calls but if we add in the rear wall we are talking months. I have noticed a few people on here mention small claims court and i wondered if i should add up all my expenses plus the £52 i paid for the jetting and take them straight there?
__________________
And the lord said "come forth and i shall grant you eternal life" I came fifth and got a toaster!!! |
| |
11th October 2007, 22:44
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Classic Account Customer | Re: Oldham Council On the surface, this does not appear to be a landlord and tenant dispute.
If you are a Council Tenant, with a lease or tenancy, please explain when it was granted, what period it is granted for or whether it is periodic, and what provisions in it are relevent to this matter: i.e. damage to the premises by the landlord's workmen.
It appears to be a potential service charge dispute, if you are a long leaseholder and the landlord has negligently damaged the premises through its agents or employees.
If you are not a Council tenant/leaseholder then you may need to consult a solicitor. This looks on its face to be a negligence claim against the contractor or the principal, i.e. the Council, for damages on the usual basis, as it would appear to be a type of road traffic accident in which the vehicle involved has caused property damage but no personal injury.
It isn't feasible to give advice on an RTA claim here, as this is a landlord and tenant forum. But if you have any landlord and tenant issues arising from this, do please post those matters here. |
| |
12th October 2007, 18:41
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer | Re: Oldham Council I disagree, council tenants are tenants (obviously) and they have rights just like the rest of us.
Questions to ask yourself going down the small claims route are:
1. can you prove this? i.e have you a letter or statement from the council about the wall, the outhouse being demolished, etc. If not then get onto them, i think you can S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) them, if you have to request all notes on any repairs done to your property and the land. Also get a letter from the jetter who said that the outhouse is causing this as it will be the basis of your claim. Has your plumbing been damaged in any other way? Could you get a plumber who isn't related to the council to come and back up the claim? Can you prove that the council botched the outhouse job? This needs to be water tight, the judge shouldn't doubt whos fault this is.
2. is it worth it? have a few tradesmen give written statements on how much this would cause to fix. Then work out how much you missed out on from work, hourly rate x amount of hours taken off. Add on court fees and a fair amount for taking time to write letters and to cover postal expenses. Remember small claims is less than £5000 so if it's lots of work or if it's going to be time consuming you might need a lawyer to take it to big court.
3. Don't forget you have to be seen to act reasonably. You absolutely must write to the council giving them 28 days to reply then comes your LBA where they get 14 days (and include a copy of the N1 you're going to submit just to show you're serious). If they cave and say they'll do it you make them specify dates and times, you should get absolutely everything in writing or recorded on the phone.
Good luck getting this fixed!
__________________ Any posts submitted here on the Consumer Action Group under the user name GlasweJen may not necessarily be the view of the poster, CAG or indeed any normal person. I've become addicted to green blobs (I have 2 now) so feel free to tip my scales if I ever make sense. |
| |
12th October 2007, 21:20
|
#7 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer | Re: Oldham Council Quote:
If he is a tenant, he is welcome to post here about any lease-related issues, such as the potential service charge implications of what has happened.
Even if he is a tenant, this is not the place to get advice on the Road Traffic Accident (RTA), negligence or damages aspects of his claim.
| I'm sorry Ed but I'm going to argue the contrary, this particular accident directly involved the poor OPs land which makes this a pretty good starting point since CAG don't have a "oops someone knocked into my property" area. Obviously a lot of advice will depend upon wether the OP is a council tenant or wether he owns the house but the name of the forum is kind of self explanatory.
A lot of CAGers post up a problem to see if its worthwhile even getting a legally trained person to look at it and that's why I posted the reply I did. As this is a self-help forum if my answer didn't suit the OP he/she can say so but it may help someone further down the line.
Also note that the OP isn't talking about the actual RTA but work done after the RTA, the digger didn't block his plumbing - the workmen did when they botched the job. In court he'd have to prove that the council were liable to fix the initial damages (i.e they're the ones who knocked down the wall in the first place) and that's where the RTA becomes relevant for his claim.
To the OP, you might want to try posting a copy of the original post in the general forum just to see what gets said there, the general forum is read by more people so you'll have more experienced eyes looking at it. |
| | |