Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The world's largest economy grew less than expected but rising inflation may delay a rate cut.View the full article
    • Hello, Following the submission of my defense, last night I received an email from DCBL indicating that the claimant intends to proceed with the claim (I've attached a screenshot of the email for reference) along with the N180 directions questionnaire. I'm unsure how they obtained my email, but I suspect it was through the courts' form when I completed the Acknowledgment of Service. This email almost slipped my attention. I have also today received a letter from court to state they have received my defense.  It appears they are requesting an online telephone hearing with the court. Could you please advise me on the necessary steps I should take at this point? Thank you for your assistance. Letter-Email 25-04-24.pdf N180 - Directions questionnaire (Small Claims Track).pdf
    • Default Amount £9237.88, all this started in 2006 Admitted debt £9075.65 Weightmans added £1515.01 immediately they became involved, no explanation The Statement shows when Marlin bought debt in May 2011 £10439.25 Their statements, not received until the SAR, are based on this. Cabot deducted £1515.01on their statements in January 2019, again did not find this out until SAR. Weightmans added in  2007 after the CH1 etc was confirmed by the court £741.50, made up of Process server fees, Court Fee (they tried for bankruptcy), Solicitors fee and Land Registry fee. Unspecfied Legal costs were added by Marlin in March 2015, again I did not know this until statements received with SAR I had been paying monthly, without exception until December 2018. I am minded to take the property charge, CH1 amount ,deduct all my payments and the subsequent fees, and request/demand a refund on the final payment made? I consistently disputed Weightmans balances, but they never responded. I also told Mortimer Clarke/Cabot that I disputed their amounts.  
    • Just follow this link and have read of some threads so your familiar with the process https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/347310-legal-n180-directions-questionnaire-small-claims-track/#comment-5178739
    • Sorry,  I'm not familiar with terminology.  Direction questionnaire is what I've seen online as next step. Witness statement: I haven't gone that far, that's why I put the question marks.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Information on Brighthouse collections procedure.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4226 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am an ex account manager (the one who take goods).

I will share some of the so called collection practices they use.

All debt falls into 4 catergories

1-7 days late phone call

8-14 days phone call and home visit

15-45 days home visit, contact references, no resolve reclaim goods

46-90 home visit to claim back goods

 

anybody over 90 days is classed as a drop off. this means you will drop off the store debt system. no further contact will be made from the store but you may be contacted by the regional debt collectors, but these only work for a week at a time in each area so don't let them scare you. you will receive a letter during each of these time frames to say that court action may occur. this NEVER happens as it would cost more than the goods are worth(unless you have three 52inch plasmas!).

Brighthouse have no right of entry to your property no matter how much they tell you otherwise, never invite them in. If they stop you shutting the door on them phone the police straight away as this is tresspassing.

All brighthouse goods have a book value. This is the value of the goods to the store. These depreciate in time, like motervehicles, if you are offered a buy out, make sure you are not paying too much for this and ask for the book value, they will be so shocked you might get a few quid off!!!

The last bit of advice i will share is that if you have paid a third of your goods overall price you have protected goods status. this means that if brighthouse reposess your goods you are most likely entitled to your money back, all of it! If you confront them with this they will not reposess, but never take a credit rewrite as this will cancel your protective goods status.

So there you have it, its a lot to take in so if you need specific advice contact me on [personal email address removed]

Edited by Lefty
It is unwise to display your personal email address
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi welshtris

Thanks for your post. Very informative.

We always welcome views from BrightHouse employees (past and present) as they do help give balance to this forum.

Please stick around, and see if you can offer any advice to some of the many threads on here.

Appreciated

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I used to do disconnections for Brighthouse and while we have no right to enter anyone’s home BHN does has the right to access their lines and taps 24/7/365. So if you are scheduled for a disconnection we will disconnect you.

 

A bad dog in your yard means that we just have to wait for animal control to get there.

 

A locked gate means that it is jumped. Or barring that, notice will be given the home owner concerning the lock and then it will be broken.

 

An irate homeowner means waiting for a police escort.

 

As for not returning BHN equipment that simply means you are passing that cost onto all their other customers, driving up the cost for all of us!

 

So the thought that you can somehow get free cable by denying BHN access to your property is wrong.

 

And the thought that it is somehow ok not to return the BHN equipment to them is misguided.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to do disconnections for Brighthouse and while we have no right to enter anyone’s home BHN does has the right to access their lines and taps 24/7/365. So if you are scheduled for a disconnection we will disconnect you.

 

A bad dog in your yard means that we just have to wait for animal control to get there.

 

A locked gate means that it is jumped. Or barring that, notice will be given the home owner concerning the lock and then it will be broken.

 

An irate homeowner means waiting for a police escort.

 

As for not returning BHN equipment that simply means you are passing that cost onto all their other customers, driving up the cost for all of us!

 

So the thought that you can somehow get free cable by denying BHN access to your property is wrong.

 

And the thought that it is somehow ok not to return the BHN equipment to them is misguided.

 

Hi Joe.

 

I think you have the wrong BrightHouse - and, er, the wrong country. Perhaps you are refering to the american cable company Bright House Networks? This forum deals (mainly) with the UK rent-to-own retailer BrightHouse, who supply goods on hire purchase to low income families.

 

Just thought I'd clarify this before your post gets chewed to pieces by other CAG members! ;)

 

Have a nice day

 

 

Cheers

Lefty

If the left side of the brain controls your right, and the right side controls your left, then left-handed people are always in their right mind!

 

Please help to support this site with a small donation... every little helps...

 

CAG- The Nation's Weekly Info Store!

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I knew there was something fishy about BH wanting to redo my credit agreement but she said she was trying to help me out by lowering my payments. I thought it was weird that she only mentioned it after I brought up the fact that some of my stuff was three quarters paid for. So have I blown it now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...