Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Should this to be take into court with him or should he send something in earlier?
    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Didnt declare voluntary work and now have dwp compliance interview dont know what to do


Skyz
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5200 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a letter to attend a compliance interview with the dwp saying a matter has arisen that they need to discuss.

 

I get incapacity benefit and DLA for mental illness. I have been in hospital 16 times in the last three years, the last hospital admission was two months a go. I have attended psychiatric day hospital treatment pretty much frequently for three years but was discharged recently.

 

There was a lot of pressure from psychiatrists to "volunteer in a charity shop" one afternoon a week to help my recovery. I didn't volunteer in a charity shop, but somewhere else for three hours a week. At times I couldn't continue because I was too unwell. It didn't occur to me to declare it because it was upaid. I now realise I was supposed to.

 

To complicate things I also did internet surveys, again which were not paid, but got sent vouchers for supermarkets. This apparently counts as payment. I am guilty therefore for not declaring two things.

 

I know I am guilty and I will plead guilty at the interview. But I am absolutely terrified of what will happen to me as I consequence. I honestly didn't know until now I was doing anything wrong.

 

I am finding it impossible to manage the weekend as I am so stressed about this compliance interview and am feeling so suicidal consequently. I don't want to end up back on a psychiatric ward.

 

Does anyone know what my punishment is likely to be for not declaring the voluntary work and for getting food vouchers. Will I be likely to end up with a criminal record? Or will I lose benefits completely or be expected to pay them all back?

 

I'm going out of my mind with worry, would appreciate feedback. I know they have to take action and it is my fault, I just would like some idea of what the action is likely to be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there. I don't know about the vouchers exactly, but I think I've heard about them being called a gift. I can't think they were worth very much, but maybe other people will comment?

 

I was also told to do voluntary work by a counsellor, declared it when I was on IB and it wasn't a problem. It was intended to ease me back into work and of course, it wasn't paid.

 

Try not to worry too much. I'm sure someone will be along soon.

 

My best.

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi skyz, I appreciate you're worried about this but please relax a little. I'm sorry I don't have a real answer for you as I don't work for the DWP [or anybody tbh!]. I hope one of those who do will pass this way soon to assist you.

But let's put things into a bit of perspective. You were advised by your medical team to do some voluntary work as part of your rehabilitation. Your treatment. To help you get well. That it should or should not be declared is something else. You were doing it for the right reasons.

Online surveys? Well, I do them too. And given the reward is so low I wouldn't dream of declaring the £10 a year amazon voucher I 'earn'. [i don't use amazon so give it away anyway!].

I can't imagine you're enjoying a life changing income from online surveys. And I don't see why you need worry overly about them.

That said, as far as I'm aware - and someone feel free to correct me - you are allowed to earn something like £10 or £20 a week over and above your benefits. I think you'd fall considerably below this level.

I am interested in how you feel hunni. Don't let this small matter be something you worry about. Don't let it make you feel suicidal. That's never the answer. I don't say that glibly. Twice in the distant past I've been there too. Quite seriously. I'm glad I never did what I thought was becoming inevitable.

There are always people who care about you. Who love you. Often in the most unexpected of places. After all, you've just joined our family here...

Take care hun, have a good weekend and so much love to you.

Rae.

Edited by RaeUK
type o
Link to post
Share on other sites

hi SKYZ

 

try not to worry and get stressed, I know its easier said then done.

The compliance team are just a team of people that deal with a change in your circumstances that may effect your benefit, they are not FIS or fraud, The interview will be no more then a chat most probably about this work

 

two things here your voluntary work and the other bit of internet survey shopping thing.

 

With what you have said I do think you could be worrying over nothing to be honest.

 

First things first the voluntary work, you can do voluntary work and it does not effect your claim, you say somewhere else, depending what you mean by this I cant see a problem in this, the only one maybe say it was unpaid voluntary work for a friend for example, who had a buisness and you could have been paid for that work then

these type of circumstance could be classed as a bit different.

But if you have only done voluntary work for three hours maybe a week in a situtation similar to that of a charity shop then that should be ok.

 

Usually the Department likes you to notify them when you start such work but its nothing to worry about. You have had enough to contend with with your health and you have done remarkably well to manage three hours.

 

With regards to the shopping vouchers, this would have to be looked at by a decision maker on two accounts.

 

First of all it would have to be accepted as permitted work but I dont think that would cause you much problem, you are keeping your mind active it can only be beneficial.

 

Permitted Work is a scheme for people on incapacity benefit who wish to try working in a limited capacity. It was designed so people could see if they were physically or mentally capable to work without it affecting their benefits.

 

Under permitted work rules it is possible for a person on incapacity benefit to work for up to 16 hours and earn up to £88.50 per week profit without it affecting their benefits. You may be able to stay on Permitted Work for 12 months and by then, you should be able to make the decision whether to go ull time.

 

Could you have been paid cash instead of the vouchers, the DM may ask that question, but if you have earned under the above you should have no worries.

 

Please dont worry anymore, hope things go well, I am sure they will, just tell them all about it you have done nothing wrong, I wish you all the best

Edited by MIKEY DABODEE
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Honeybee, I appreciate your reply. The vouchers were worth hardly anything, £4 at a time but really infrequent, it comes in total to less than £2 a week over the year, none of it in cash, all in supermarket food tokens. I'm worried because I didn't declare the voluntary work to IB, I now know I should have done, but I really didn't think at the time, it just never really occurred to me either of these things would be an issue. It wasn't that I deliberately didn't disclose the information, I just didn't think at all. I will be honest and declare everything in the interview, I'm very worried because I know I am basically guilty and obviously they have to take action, I understand that. I just hope they realise that I was entitled to the incapacity and how ill I have been. Because it is mental illness it is so much harder to prove, although my psychiatrist has written a letter for the interview supporting that I am still in treatment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, just noticed the replies from Kelcou and Mikey as well, I am touched by your responses and that people are replying. I take on board what people have said, at no point did I intentionally do anything wrong or fraudulent. Am trying not to panic, its just so hard. Thank you though for your support and advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Honeybee, I appreciate your reply. The vouchers were worth hardly anything, £4 at a time but really infrequent, it comes in total to less than £2 a week over the year, none of it in cash, all in supermarket food tokens. I'm worried because I didn't declare the voluntary work to IB, I now know I should have done, but I really didn't think at the time, it just never really occurred to me either of these things would be an issue. It wasn't that I deliberately didn't disclose the information, I just didn't think at all. I will be honest and declare everything in the interview, I'm very worried because I know I am basically guilty and obviously they have to take action, I understand that. I just hope they realise that I was entitled to the incapacity and how ill I have been. Because it is mental illness it is so much harder to prove, although my psychiatrist has written a letter for the interview supporting that I am still in treatment.

 

 

You have nothing at all to worry about,

they will have to conduct the interview, send it to the decision maker then the file will be written up, please dont worry :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...