Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How To Handle Nuisance Calls


diddydicky
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5534 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

now this relates to nuisance marketing calls from HSBC rather than debt collectors but the principle is the same, after many letters asking them to stop ringing (they'd pretend it was a matter about our account in order to get to marketing something) without success i adopted a very succesful strategy and the conversation went like this (dates and names changed)

 

 

HSBC Hello can i speak to david john smith please

 

r/ yes speaking

 

HSBc introduction rubiish then - before i commence can i just go through

some security questions with you

 

r/ yes of course

 

HSBC what is the month and year of your date of birth

 

r/ my FULL date of birth is 14/10/1955

 

hsbc im sorry that is not what we have on our records can you just

confirm the month and year of your date of birth

 

r/ yes i just told you my date of birth is 14 october 1955!

 

hsbc I', sorry this is not the information we have, you ARE Mr David John

smith

 

r/ yes of course i think i should know my own date of birth don't you?

what date of birth do you have on your records

 

hsbc im sorry i cant tell you that data protection act

 

r/ so what is it you wanted?

 

hsbc Im sorry i cant discuss that as you didnt pass the security check

 

r/ thats a shame you seem so nice- goodbye!

 

 

on the next few calls i continued to change the date of birth and continued with the ploy

 

hey presto 2 weeks later- no calls

 

you could of course just give a different name and say your brother is not at home he's away for 6 weeks on a cruise or travelling the country looking for work

 

whatever......... they certainly cant discuss anything with someone else about your account theyre stuffed!

 

try it- it works

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's hard not to play these people for fools, however, it seems odd that any one ringing you should ask security questions. I think I would be telling them that I have only their word that they are who they say they are and that I have no intention of giving out information that might jepordise my security and they should know this and can I speak to their supervisor.

I do very little but I do it very, very well :cool:

 

If I've helped give my scales a click

:smile:

 

I have no legal experience and all advice given is based on the knowledge I've gained from this site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

joint the tps website

 

bye bye calls!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just tell them the number called is registered with the TPS, not to call again and hang the phone up.

 

If they do call back, I will either play games (like pretending to be deaf) with them if in a bad mood, or in a good mood call back and give a manager an earful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the point of my thread was that telling them that you wont talk to them wont work - because their job is to harrass and torment you with incessant calls until you give in

 

however these guys work on bonuses and commissions so all the time you protest they think they are getting to you and will continue he making the calls

 

however if they realise after three or four calls that you are taking this p*ss, and since they cannot reveal what the security information is that they have got ( in case they are not talking to the right person) then it is THEY who will get demoralised because they realise that you are giving better than you are getting

 

just treat then calls as a game with this ploy and i guarantee after two weeks tops they will give up and then write to you only

Link to post
Share on other sites

tendogs- do that and you'll play right into their hands-- you will not know that you are talking to a real supervisor and since the object of the call is to get you to talk to them and reveal information you would be defeating the object of the excerise- NO CALLS NO UNWRTTEN communication

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...