Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have had a secondary thought.  I borrowed £s from a completely separate entity 6y ago. It was personal and unsecured. I was going to repay upon sale of the property. But then repo and I couldn't.  Eventually they applied and got a charging order on the property.  Their lawyers wrote that if I didn't repay they may apply for an order for sale.  I'm not in control of the sale.  The lender won't agree to an order for sale.  The judge won't expedite it/ extract from trial.  Someone here on cag may or may not suggest I can apply for an order v the receiver?  But could I alternatively ask this separate entity with a c.o to carry out their threat and actually make an application to court for an order for sale v the receiver instead?
    • You left the PCN number showing, but no worries, I've redacted it. Euro Car parks are very well known to us.  I've just skimmed through the titles of the latest 100 cases we have with them (I gave up after 100) and, despite all their bluster and threats, in not one have they taken the Cagger to court. You stayed there for 2 hours &:45 minutes.  I'm guessing the limit is 2 hours and 30 minutes, right?  
    • If the claimant fails to draft directions the court can order a Case Management Hearing to set them but normally in Fast Track claims the claimant sets the directions...Unlike small claims track which are always set the court.
    • Not Evris offer, the court offers mediation service.   All claims proceed to hearing if mediation fails /not happen.   Why do you not wish to attend in person to stand your claim ?     Absolutely you must comply with the courts directions or your claim risks being struck out. Preparation for a hearing should happen irrespective of mediation.   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/460613-suing-a-parcel-delivery-company-when-you-dont-have-a-direct-contract-with-them-–-third-party-rights-copy-of-judgment-available/#comment-5255007   Andy  
    • LPA.  (I'm fighting insolvency due to all the stuff that he and lender have done).  He appointed estate agents - (changed several times). Disclosure shows he was originally appointed for a specific reason (3m after repo) : using his powers as acting for leaseholder to serve notice on freeholders (to grab fh).  There was interest from 3 potential buyers. He chose one whose offer depended on a positive result of the notice.  Disc also shows he'd taken counsel advice - which was 'he'd fail'.  He'd simultaneously asked to resign as his job (of serving notice) was done and he'd found a buyer.  Lender asked him to stay on to assign notice to the buyer.  Notice failed, buyer didn't buy.  So receiver stayed.  There was 1 buyer who wanted to proceed w/o fh but receiver/ lender wasted 1y trying to get rid of them!  Disc shows why. But I didn't know why at the time. In later months Lender voiced getting rid of receiver. Various reasons - including cost.  But there's a contradiction/ irony: as I've seen an email (of 4y ago) which shows the receiver telling lender not to incur significant costs and to minimize receiver costs.    Yet lender then asked him to serve another notice - again counsel advice indicated 'he'd fail'.  And he did fail.  But wasted 3y trying and incurred huge legal costs - lender trying to pass on to me. Lender interfered - said wanted to do works.  Receiver should have said no.  But disc. shows he agreed to step aside to let them do the works - on proviso lender would discuss potential costs first (they didn't), works wouldn't take long (took 15m), and lender would hold interest (they didn't) (this last point is crucial for me now - as I need to know if I can argue that all interest beyond this point shouldnt be allowed?)   I need to check receiver witness statement in litigation with freeholders to see exactly what he said about 'his position'. But I remember it being along the lines of - 'if the works increased the value of the property he didn't have a problem'.  Lender/ receiver real problems started at this point. The cost of works and 4y passage of time has meant there is no real increase in value. Lender (or receiver) didn't get any permissions (statutory or fh) (and didn't tell me) and just bulldozed the property to an empty shell.  The freeholders served notice on me as leaseholder for breach of covenants (strict no alterations).  The Lender stepped in (acting for me) to issue notice for relief of forfeiture - not the receiver.  That wasted 2y of litigation (3y if inc the works) and incurred huge costs (both sides).  Lender's aim was to do the works that every potential buyer balked at due to the lease restrictions.  Lender and receiver knew couldn't do works w/o fh permission. Lender did them anyway; receiver allowed.  Receiver remained appointed.  I'm arguing lender interfered in receiver duties.  Receiver should have just sold property 4-5y ago w/o allowing any works.  Almost 3y since works finished the property remains unsold (>5y from repo). The property looks brand new - but it was great before.  The lender spent a ton of money - hoping that would facilitate a quick sale.  But the money they spent and the years they have wasted has meant they had to increase sale price.  It's now completely overpriced.  And - of course - the same issues that put buyers off (before works) still exist.   The receiver has tried for 2y to assert the works increased value. But he is relying on agents estimates - which have proved highly speculative. (Usual trick of an agent to give a high value to get the business - and then tell seller to reduce when no-one buys.). And of course lender continues to accrue interest (despite 4y ago receiver saying pause interest). Lender tried to persuade receiver to use specific agent. Disc shows this agent was best friends with the lender's main investor in the property.  Before works this agent had valued it low.  After works this agent suggested a value 70% higher!  The lender persuaded receiver to sack one agent and instead use this agent.  No offers. (Price way too high).   Research has uncovered that this main investor has since died.  I guess his investment is part of probate? And his family want it back?    Disc shows the sacked agent had actually received a high offer 1y ago.  Receiver rejected it.  (thus I don't know if the buyer would have ever proceeded). He was relying on the high speculative valuation the agents had given him to pitch for the business. The agents were in a catch-22.  The receiver sacked them. Disc shows there has been 0 interest ever since (inc via new agent requested by lender). I don't think lender or receiver want all this to come out in public domain via a trial.  It will ruin their reputations. If I can't get an order for sale with lender - can I apply separately against receiver?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Living abroad, can I leave uk debts behind?


Diceboy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3957 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi,

currently living in another country (within the EU) and might be staying here for a while. My banks do have my address here however the debt agency that was harassing me back in the uk dont. Now the question that im sure many have thought about.

 

Can i leave the debts behind and do a sort of a runner on them? (changing my address here soon again).

 

 

what can happen? have herad about alot of ppl that have done similar things and got away with it.

 

thanks

diceboy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes indeed interesting.

 

What tends to happen is that the DCA will be given your address in Timbuktoo, however the DCA is in it to make money so they may just send a cursory letter or two, till you move. Whilst your away, the letters will escalate and it may go to court some 2 years time and the bailiff will turn up and someone at your uk address will say oh that bloke left moons ago. the bailiff will return the warrant as debtor left address, and will return the warrant back to the bank, the bank will then sit on the debt for a while even though they know you are abroad.

 

Now then depending on how much you owe they may decide to take the matter up in the country that you live in, that is to say, they may ask the court of the country you live in, to serve on you via the Foreign Process Section of the Royal Courts of Justice a summons to appear at court etc,

 

However that is highly unlikely, its a bit like a UFO picking me up to go to an Elvis Concert. Why ? because its too much hasle to high a cost, and the chances are you may refuse to accept UK summons issued in a Eu country.

 

So the answer it may seem is simple:-

 

You go to timbuktoo.

 

Bank can't find you.

 

2 years down the line issue warrant to bailiff at address you no longer live at.

 

No further action.

 

Until of course you call your bank and say "Honey I'm Home!"

** Credentials **

 

10 Years Finance Fraud Investigator

 

5 Year High Court Sheriffs

 

2 Years Tip Staff Royal Courts

 

Currently : HMCS Enforcement Officer

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can run, but you can't hide. Sooner or later it will catch up with you and who knows what the charges might be then.

 

The CAG does not condone debt avoidance.

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to expand on what Rooster has said, there is now reciprocal debt collection arrangements in a lot of the EU, where he debt can be passed to local enforcement agencies, and sanctions can be placsed on your assets, I believe this goes further to Canada, Aus, US and NZ.

 

So it is very true that you can run but can't hide.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks guys for the advice,

the question was a theorethical one, morally i understand that it is wrong and if have spent the money im willing to payit (but not when it comes to charges piled on charges):-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add what my site colleagues have said. It may seem appealing to move abroad to escape UK debts, the person in debt can run but they can't always hide. Creditors have been known to stop chasing those they can't find, however moving abroad doesn't always mean they can't find the debtor. Creditors use the following tactics to trace debtors, talking to neighbours at their debtor's last known address and tracing their activity through using cash. In some cases creditors have relations with other credit companies in that country, making it easier for them to find you. Once the creditor knows which country you are in, they can trace you relatively quickly and start pursuing you for the debt. So it may seem a good idea to move abroad and leave your debts behind, but the creditors can and probably will find you and demand the debt is repaid.

You should ideally establish a repayment agreement with the creditors before leaving the UK. There are many options to clear your debt, even if you no longer live in the UK, for example bankruptcy, IVAs or DMPs. Payplan can offer advice on all UK debts even if you no longer live in the country, however if you are abroad you should make it a priority to make a payment agreement with your creditors. If you fail to make a payment agreement your new life in a new county could be affected as your credit rating may result in you being unable to get jobs or a simple bank account.

Good luck, but think wisely.

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also what happens when and if you return to the UK?

 

Running from things is the easy option, but like the others have said they do catch up with you and by then it far worse than the original problem,

 

Good luck though with you move

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

They're not all that great.

 

My brother moved just over one hundred miles away from his home ten years ago to try out a new area.

 

He went with a mate, ended up getting married to a local lass, kids, bought a house etc, but he didn't move to avoid debt.

 

Yet all debt he did have previously was written off as no creditor even bothered to contact him.

 

Not a jot on his credit record where he owed about £8k including council tax.

 

Why go abroad?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

An interesting question here. Don't know if it helps, but I have moved TO the UK from far far away, and relatively small debts back home have now been erased from what I can tell.

Still, the Estate Agent I went through to rent a flat tried to charge me for searching my history, though he also told me this search is only done within the UK, not in my home country. Of course, I refused to pay it.

 

Though, in reply to Weird Al's comment 'Why move abroad?' - I mean no offence, as England has in my opinion some of the most beautiful country in the world - but I must say............'Why not?'

I have read that it is approx 20% more expensive to live in the UK than the US (not where I am from). It is very very expensive here, and I can see that it is very easy to get into debt. The government and almost every business I have dealt with in the UK have attempted to charge me ridiculous fees, taxes, TV licence etc...I like it here, but it is so corrupt and ridiculous that websites like this one must be started. Rather than get into trouble with debts in the UK, I can't see the problem in moving to a much sunnier, more friendly, and FAR cheaper country.

 

Having said that, home is always home, no matter what.

...and debt is always debt.......

...and Karma is always Karma!

 

Please don't mistake this for a complaint about the UK - that is not my intention. The UK is wonderful - just too expensive compared to other countries. I think the evidence speaks for itself, though I welcome any comments - especially regarding the UK being approx 20% more expensive than the USA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I lived in Munich, Germany after moving there from London where I was working at the time. My work contract specified that should I leave my job within 2 yrs I would have to pay back my relocation costs pro rata.

 

Cutting a long story short I had a very well paid job and quite a bit of credit, I broke my back whilst skiing on a weekend trip to Austria and ended up breaking up with my wife and resigning from my job. I returned to the UK to try and patch up my marriage and failed.

 

I had been unable to work for some time at this point and moved around a lot, starting to work at a reasonable level soon after.

 

Debts had mounted to around £70,000 and I basically buried my head in the sand and tried to pay back what I could when I could.

 

My accountant pestered me to go bankrupt which I put off for 5 years, I eventually did go bankrupt and since I had no assets, house/mortgage etc. and comparatively low earnings I walked away from the debt's legally.

 

I wished I had taken his advice 5 years earlier and done it then, it really was the best thing I could have done. I would have struggled to pay that amount back for many more years to come. Instead it was all over in 3 short years.

 

I believe it's only 1 year or as low as 6 months in some cases nowadays until a bankruptcy is spent.

 

My credit rating returned very quickly and getting a mortgage or credit card has been no problem since.

 

I left many debts behind when I moved to Germany but did come back and face the music eventually. The problems became much smaller when I did finally sort through it all and complete a bankruptcy. I did find in many cases that banks had written off debts as well as HP firms etc and they responded saying I owed nothing.

 

Daft thing was I finally went through with the bankruptcy over a £500 fee my solicitors tried to charge me for a service I didn't ask for. They hassled me constantly and I had to go for verbal something or other at court over it. Amongst the many other things they did.

 

I regretted many of the debts that where left unpaid but screwing the solicitors made the bad taste at least a little minty :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to expand on what Rooster has said, there is now reciprocal debt collection arrangements in a lot of the EU, where he debt can be passed to local enforcement agencies, and sanctions can be placsed on your assets, I believe this goes further to Canada, Aus, US and NZ.

 

North Korea might be worth a try.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest 10110001
North Korea might be worth a try.

 

North Korea is a dump! zero prospects & no quality of life.

 

Dubai, I fly plenty of expats to/from DXB who take on 3 & 6 year contracts and return to Britain with a tax fee lump sum and UK debts expired under the Limitation Act 1980.

 

You can leave your debts behind but its irresponsible. Why dont you tip them into a bankruptcy before you go? At least you have cleaned up after yourself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest 10110001

A bankrupt can hold a passport and have freeedom of mobility, even pilots can be bankrupt and continue to work. There is nothing in our contract of employment requiring disclosure of bankruptcy.

 

I come across revenue passangers, many of them travel in First class! who are bankrupt and able to board the aircraft. They only lose the right to be a company director, but they can still travel on business as an employee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have paid off all our debts (mostly due to recovered bank charges!!) but we still have a very bad credit rating - thank you Tesco Finance, as they say every little helps -

A member of my family recently went bankrupt - loosing my Mothers house into the bargain and then his wife went bankrupt a couple of years later. They have now got a mortgage - have loads of holidays and seem generally quite well off....

We on the other hand still have 2 1/2 years to go before we can cancel the bad credit, even though we paid the debt off on the day we realised that Tesco were going to "recover" the money.

We have really suffered trying to cope and It really makes my quite cross that the more you try in this country the more you are ripped off. Ex doesnt pay child maintenance (for his 3 kids) at the correct amount.....and I c ouldn't afford to sue him AGAIN -as I wasnt entitled to legal aid! - I ended up paying up the court costs from the last case - even though the cost were given to him..but attached by the land registry to my house!- but he has lots of holidays and a new family -

We are really getting fed up of Rip Off Britain, and are now considering leaving to sunnier climes

My new husband and I work hard and try to cope - but we really are the suckers in all this. We should just have sold our house, spent the money and then gone bankrupt, we should have abandon the kids to yheir father and his family and done a runner to spain - ! But unfortunately we choose to keep trying! More fool us!

Rant Over!!!:mad:

If I have been of any help to you please be kind enough to click on my scales! Thank you

 

:D Halifax Bank...December 2006 ..... WON! 1 week after N1 filed.

:eek: Lloyds TSB....... April 2007 Lloyds TSB.....WON, 1 day before prelim. court date, still went before judge.

:p Nationwide.........April 2007 Nationwide.......WON, 3 weeks after N1 filed.

:rolleyes: Nat West....June 2007 (on behalf of friend) Settled after LBA and before filing.

:smile:HSBC - full settlement ...on behalf of my son...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Feel much better with that off my chest! I am usually such a positive person!:p

If I have been of any help to you please be kind enough to click on my scales! Thank you

 

:D Halifax Bank...December 2006 ..... WON! 1 week after N1 filed.

:eek: Lloyds TSB....... April 2007 Lloyds TSB.....WON, 1 day before prelim. court date, still went before judge.

:p Nationwide.........April 2007 Nationwide.......WON, 3 weeks after N1 filed.

:rolleyes: Nat West....June 2007 (on behalf of friend) Settled after LBA and before filing.

:smile:HSBC - full settlement ...on behalf of my son...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest 10110001
I ended up paying up the court costs from the last case - even though the cost were given to him..but attached by the land registry to my house

 

Land Registry wouldn't file a legal charge on your property unless asked them to, or a court orders a charging order.

 

On what basis did the court decide you should be liable for a costs order made against your ex?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont know the answer to that...

But I know that at the time I thought that it was very unfair - my solicitor told me that it was because the legal aid people would want to be paid come what may, and that as I had assets (the equity in the house) worth more than 30k, as my "winnings".

 

The costs were first awarded 50/50 then he argued with the judge who then said to him that he was right and it wasn't fair, and they then awarded the cost 75% against him and 25% agaisnt me. this was then attached to the land registry/ when I remarried and we moved 2 years later the money was automatically taken from the proceeds of the sale. 7K

I have constantly wondered if there is a way to get this money back - it was 11 years ago - but he lied in court about having a new woman in his life - and moved in with her straight after court....they bought a house together when they got married a couple of years after that.

Any help is greatly appreciated - from anyone....?

If I have been of any help to you please be kind enough to click on my scales! Thank you

 

:D Halifax Bank...December 2006 ..... WON! 1 week after N1 filed.

:eek: Lloyds TSB....... April 2007 Lloyds TSB.....WON, 1 day before prelim. court date, still went before judge.

:p Nationwide.........April 2007 Nationwide.......WON, 3 weeks after N1 filed.

:rolleyes: Nat West....June 2007 (on behalf of friend) Settled after LBA and before filing.

:smile:HSBC - full settlement ...on behalf of my son...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest 10110001

Was this your house? Or a house you bought together when you were married?

 

I think what’s happened is the court gave you the house in whole in the divorce proceeding, less the legal costs of all parties. If he came away from the divorce with any equity or property, and a legal fees liability then that’s the property the charging order would have been made against. 7K is very reasonable for a solicitor-assisted divorce.

 

Long story short: I (acrimoniously) divorced in 2003 and my solicitor’s fees were £21K and ex wife’s were legal aid bill was £30K. I was exonerated of liability from her legal fees. My ex wife was more interested in getting the house – and even used the children as a bargaining chip, so I played on this and suggested to the court she gets the rent-free exclusive use of the house under a Mesher order, where the house is returned to me once the children become of age. I charged my legal fees on that house and the remaining equity pays off the mortgage capital on my current house. However, there is a sub charge to pay for my ex wife legal fees because I argued a case that this would negate any equity she would have received if the house had been divided.

 

A year after decree absolute, my ex wife wanted to re-open the proceedings contending I failed to disclose an imminent change of circumstances. On decree absolute I was a first officer on BA flying Boeing 767’s, however after my divorce I automatically attracted a child maintenance liability and ex wife elected to use the Child Support Agency formula because it gave her greater financial benefits. It was actually coincidence I transferred to Dubai based Emirates for line training on Boeing 777’s and I argued to her solicitor it was simply furthering my career. Being based in Dubai, I became tax exempt in the UK, and makes paying the UK’s Child Support Agency more affordable and gives me control how much I pay, as a non jurisdiction Non Resident Parent enforcement is not possible and Dubai has no resiprocating laws with Britain. The attempted rescinding of decree absolute was dismissed on the basis that ex wife wanted to increase her lifestyle and no new evidence was being presented.

 

I accepted that my transfer to Dubai was on the cards but no contract had been signed by decree absolute date, so in any event my proposed circumstances could not have been taken into account as they were not calculable

 

Proving your ex lied in court 11 years ago will be almost impossible and I think it might be out of time. I would get a free, or fixed fee solicitor’s consultation, there might be some case law you can call upon, and you might well have some recourse if new information has surfaced since decree absolute was pronounced.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isnt there a time limit on debt.???

I thought that after a perod of 7 yrs all your bad debt history was history. ??. Even the taxman can only go back 7 yrs, cant he.??

Can anyone confirm that please.

 

Just~Me

Please dont think the picture is me.!!! I couldnt find one of myself so decided to use one of the wife. :):)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont know the answer to that...

But I know that at the time I thought that it was very unfair - my solicitor told me that it was because the legal aid people would want to be paid come what may, and that as I had assets (the equity in the house) worth more than 30k, as my "winnings".

 

The costs were first awarded 50/50 then he argued with the judge who then said to him that he was right and it wasn't fair, and they then awarded the cost 75% against him and 25% agaisnt me. this was then attached to the land registry/ when I remarried and we moved 2 years later the money was automatically taken from the proceeds of the sale. 7K

I have constantly wondered if there is a way to get this money back - it was 11 years ago - but he lied in court about having a new woman in his life - and moved in with her straight after court....they bought a house together when they got married a couple of years after that.

Any help is greatly appreciated - from anyone....?

 

What happened to shares in the house? The cost against your ex could only be apportioned against his share in any equity, not yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The way the case went in court was that I was "given" the house and the morgage! His name was taken off the house - but stayed on the morgage untill I sold up 2 years later.We had only bought the house 6 weeks before he left. so there was not much equity and a lot of debts.

He was given all the family debts to pay off - loans etc that HE had taken on - one however was in my name also - but he was told that he had to pay it off. ( I know - I know.....I got a call from the Nationwide heavies telling me that no court in the land can tell me I dont have to pay them if the other 1/2 does not keep up the repayments)

So after the divorvce he had no capital to attach the legal aid costs to - I did so that is why I had to pay them, he also just kept on messing about with the court order ie. 2 weeks after I met my (now) husband, he stopped all my maintenance and then only paid the least possible for the children - knowing that I could not afford to go to court again, and was not now entitled to legal aid - because of my "partner". I then took it out of the hands of the court and put it onto the CSA but they were even more useless and at the same time stopped automatically reassesing payments, even though that was the reason I went to them!.

So in asnswer to make then aktiv runners - I got all the shares and he got nothing....The share was worth nothing aswell, and I had 3 kids, a part time job and a huge mortgage - I sold up to get his name off the morgage completely as I couldnt trust him and bought with my new husband, and I still copped it!!

This may seem like just sour grapes - but it is still very unfair to have the courts award him 75% of the costs - but I have to pay them!

I think I will go to a solicitor like 1011001 sugests ...... I will see if it can now be attached to his proberty and paid back to me!

Also ref the 7 year claim thing Bank Action Group members have been succesfully suing banks for more amounts that go back more than & years see "Pen" thRead

If I have been of any help to you please be kind enough to click on my scales! Thank you

 

:D Halifax Bank...December 2006 ..... WON! 1 week after N1 filed.

:eek: Lloyds TSB....... April 2007 Lloyds TSB.....WON, 1 day before prelim. court date, still went before judge.

:p Nationwide.........April 2007 Nationwide.......WON, 3 weeks after N1 filed.

:rolleyes: Nat West....June 2007 (on behalf of friend) Settled after LBA and before filing.

:smile:HSBC - full settlement ...on behalf of my son...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...