keith22 LloydsTSB PPI

[Keith22]

Hi all

After months of wrangling with Lloyds my two claims for refund of PPI are now with the Financial Ombudsman. On paper they look cut and dried in my favour but the Bank have raised a number of issues in defence. The last letter from the FSO says " We have now received your file from the insurer. From our initial assessment your case is one that needs to be considered in detail by one of our adjudicators." So progress is being made but there is apparently a backlog of cases.

I'm going to try and put together a strong legal case for the court in case the FSO finds against me. Even if not then the work might be useful for others.

[kokomar]

Hi Keith

Any chance you could post a few more details we're all really interested as there are a few of us just starting out. Good Luck with the FSO.

Koko

[Keith22]

Hi Koko,

Yes - this concerns PPI on two business loans. In the case of the first loan the matter of PPI was never discussed in any shape or form - I just assumed that it was part of the loan. The second case was similar but the loan was arranged over the phone and again PPI was not discussed. Earlier this year I was talking to my business manager about another matter when insurance was brought up. I have a number of long term medical conditions which he pointed out would cause a problem with the existing PPI. He got me a copy of the agreements I had signed ( I was only ever given the last page to sign ) and I found that the tick boxes on the form, including the one about pre-existing conditions had all be filled in by the bank without my knowledge. Effectively this means that the insurance was pretty useless.

Amongst the gems I have had from the bank when I tried to claim a refund:

"We feel it is unfair of you to make a claim having had the benefit of the insurance for so long."

"We agree that insurance should be discussed with clients but it is so long ago that we don't know whether we did or not but we feel that we probably did!"

There is some useful stuff on the FSA web site which is about how companies should approach the sale of PPI FSA and also the FSO Financial Ombudsman Service

Basically Lloyds seldom refund premiums whithout a fight although some people have been successful. You will probably have to look for some evidence of misselling. This incudes the Bank making sure that the insurance was fit for your purposes, not making it a compulsory part of the loan etc etc

Do you have a copy of the orginal documents you signed? If not you should ask for copies - beware that this is not straight forward for Limited Companies if you are a business.

I think the terms and conditions if you do not have them are on their website Welcome to LloydsTSB.com

[kokomar]

Thank you so much. I'm already a frequent visitor to the FSA website, I'll reread the FOS one during daylight hours. My first loan was taken our in 1997 then refinanced a further four times. I have the last agreement but not the third which is the one I'm particularly interested in so have already done a cca request (as well as S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)). The terms and conditions on their website now will be different to the ones applied to all my agreements as the FSA so helpfully point out PPI policies before 1995 were unregulated products so I'll have to wait and see what they come up with. I'm lucky in a way as I'm already at the court stage for reclaiming unlawful charges from Lloyds which will give me enough to get into the black anyway. Going after the PPI is a personal thing, I want them to admit they took advantage of me and treated me unfairly so I'm in it for the long haul. Lloyds in particular seem to fight even when it's blantantly obvious to all that they are in the wrong as in your case. They will be in default on Friday if they haven't complied with the CCA requests at which point I will notify them that all my accounts are in dispute, but like my Bank Manager once said to me they really don't care about small people like me, unless you owe them hundreds of thousands or you deposit hundreds of thousands you're off the radar, so I don't think they'll care enough to want to settle they'll just drag me through the process. One question: What made you go down the FOS route instead of taking them straight to court? Koko

[Keith22]

Hi

I too want Lloyds to pay for all the distress and heartache they have caused me plus all the damage to a successful business so lets get em!. My claim for unlawful charges is also underway but as it is for Limited Companies there are slight differences to take into account.

The reason I have gone to the FSO first regarding the PPI is that I thought it might be worth a shot and its free! Court proceedure won't be as cut and dried as reclaiming charges which thanks to this site follows a well defined pattern. i.e. Case Law etc.

I think we will have to do some considerable research to establish a method or points of law that can be adapted for individual scenarios with PPI. I'm not too sure where to begin which is another reason why I went to the FSO although it has to be said that they don't fill me full of confidence.

[bandonbhoy]

In 1998, because of the bank charges that were being taken of my account I was about 3000 in the red and one of the assistant managers in the bank agreed to give me loan to pay that off, but only if I took out their insurance(PPI). I had never taken nay of those out in the past because I was in tenured position at university. I think this managers insistence was against the law. He had young girl in the office with him and when he went out, she said she was sorry for me being put into that postion. I am attempting to get details of that loan to raise case against them.

[Keith22]

Even their own staff think there is miselling. Have a look at the survey in this document.
http://www.ltu.co.uk/includes/downlo...=0&method=view

Sorry link doesn't seem to work I'll try again

[bach]

Hi Keith,

Thanks for sharing your info, Im going for PPI & ERC with London Mortgage Company and probably a few other when Iv got statements etc.

Like you I had my loan aggrement ticked by some one else and only signed the back page of the agreement.

Please keep your thread updated, will be following you with great interest.
Good Luck
Lynn

PS Great link

[Keith22]

One of the problems seems to be that Lloyds treat every case differently and they do not have a consistent approach. Some people seem to have got refunds relatively easily but the great majority are left struggling. I'm trying to put together a mammoth post with all the references and bits and bobs I have found. I'm not a legal expert of any kind so I'm hoping that others will chip in with anything they have. Hopefully between us all we can the refine the info into a comprehensive list so that others can dip into it and extract what they need for their own particular circumstances and claims.

I also notice that there are threads regarding PPI dotted all over the forum. I wonder whether it is worth asking the owners of those threads to consider asking the mods to move them into this PPI section so they we can more easily help each other and keep track of progress.

[reidnet]

Hi,
I did manage to get PPI refund from Lloyds TSB and to be honest they gave up without too much of a fight..I was surprised to be Honest. Then again I have seen cases that they just dont want to give in to customers for some reason.

Not so easy with Purpleloans/GE Money though, the policy and loan were from Firstplus, at that time Purpleloans were acting as agents for Firstplus.

But never mind they are about to be named and shamed in the Daily Record next Thursday..lol ( Inside Info..lol in fact they are using my case as a base for the story as i have been working closely with one of their Journalists and have supplied her with lots of information etc. Got the Photographer from the Paper comming on Tuesday to take pics..) and of Course ConsumerActionGroup.co.uk should also be mentioned as a good source for information and advice.

Ian

[Keith22]

Hi all,

This is the time scale for my complaint to the FSO:

Original complaint sent to FSO October 13th
Aknowledgement October 20th.
Initial assessment and passed to adjudicaor October 25th
Acknowledgement from adujuicator November10th
Letter from adjudicator Nover 17th asking for copy of company accounts to check turnover was less than £1,000,000!!!
Phoned adjudicator November 20th to check requirements and posted accounts same day.

I have received a letter today (22/12/06) from the ombudsman (quote) "I have received the bank's papers in relation to your complaint and having reviewed them I consider that the policies were mis-sold to you in 2004 and 2005. I have sent my assessment to the bank and now await its response."

This is progress but I suppose I now have to wait and see whether the Bank accept the recommendation or want to escalate the complaint to the more formal process with the Obudsman.

Total amount by the way is around £3.9K plus interest.

[Bicester1]

Keith

Good luck!

Like you I am taking on Lloyds for mis-selling. You seem further ahead in the process than me but I'm going straight for the Courts I have little faith in the FSO particulary as my claim dates back to 1999 and I assume the FSO will simply say that they have no jurisdiction prior to '95 I have drafted a prelim which is in this forum. Any comments gratefully received!

Bicester1!

[The Capitulator]

Hi K & All

Can I throw my hand in here?
LSTB 3ppi's on same account over 3 years just started correspondance and have had standard sod off letters(2)
My alledged debt of £18k is prob at least £8k of miss-sold ppi

[Keith22]

Hi Capitulator and welcome.

The sod off letters are pretty standard but don't give up - some people here have succeed in getting refunds just by being persistant. It looks as though you are going to be in the same long battle as the rest of us. I think the way forward is to establish exactly why you think the policies were mis-sold to you and then try to find some supporting evidence. For example in one of my cases the actual application form for PPI had been filled in incorrectly and this had happened without my knowledge! You will also need to go through the Terms and Conditions with a fine tooth comb. Once you have got it all clearly sorted out it puts you in a stronger position. You then have the option of the CC or the FSO once Lloyds have sent you the final response.

Good luck - keep us informed

[reidnet]

Hi Keith & Capitulator,
I think we need to be prepared for a long drawn out battle with some of these companies. I know I have been fighting with GE Money / Purpleloans since September, Many a time I have thought, is it worth the hassle..Yes of course it is ,Win or loose at least it may make them sit back and actually think about how they behave with Customers complaints.

I am just about to HIT Ge Money with court claim in the next week or so, What you really have to do is gather as much information as possible, I have used discrepenceies in their correspondence etc as part of my evidence too. In one piece of correspondence a document was reffered to by the manager handling my complaint, no such documment was produced under my S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) , so someone is telling porkie pies or they have failed under the Data Protection Act. Just little things like that may help in any court case..Hopefully the Judge will get some idea of how these companies try to fob off complaints re mis selling etc.

The more complaints that are raised about this issue may eventually get word to these companies that we are not going to accept their hard selling, Mis selling and deceitful way that they sell these grossly overpriced policies any longer. Especially when it has been revealed that commision / Bonus paid for the sale of some of these policies can be as high as 65% of the cost of the policy. I think this may be a major factor on how they use the above tactics to sell this product, but thats just my view..lol

Good luck Guys and keep up the fight. and remember to watch Tonight with Trevor McDonald on 17th January. ..

Ian

[Keith22]

Hi Reidnet and all,

Sorry about the length of this post!

My particular claims are against Lloydtsb so I don't know much about any other companies. To put matters in context I first started investigating my PPI one year ago next week so anyone considering this should be prepared for the long haul.

I have learnt a few things during my long journey which might be helpful (or not!) to others but most importantly there does not seem to be much consistency with Lloyds reactions to claims. I am aware of PPI refunds which were obtained fairly easily after just a few letters and in some cases based on what seemed a very flimsy case for repayment. Yet I know of others, mine included, where there is absolute evidence of mis-selling and yet the Bank have dug their heels in and refused refunds.

For anybody thinking about taking on Lloyds I can make a few points. Firstly as far as I'm aware their PPI has a single premium which is added on to the cost of the loan. Recent application forms for loans have any PPI split out and interest quoted separately but this has not always been the case. The T & C's seem pretty standard and are they same as far as I can tell despite which underwriters the Bank uses for the PPI. My two lots of PPI are with different underwriters not that this makes much difference. These T & C's spell out how much refund you will get in the case of early settlement of the loan (or if by some miracle you can get the PPI cancelled) Be prepared to be shocked by how much you will lose under these circumstances.

The T & C's also have a standard 30 day get out clause and the Bank will often try to use this as a way of getting out of a mis-selling claim. They will tell you you had 30 days to cancel if you were not satisifed with the arrangement. IMHO this is nonsense. The 30 days are a cooling of period, they are not there to give the client time to discover that the Bank has mis-sold the policy. Following on from this in order to stand any chance of a refund from Lloyds you have to prove mis-selling - just to complain some time later that you don't like the interest rate is not going to cut much ice.

The most common reason for mis-selling seems to be that the client was forced to take out PPI in order to obtain a loan. The lender obviously has a duty to consider how its money will be repaid in the event of the borrower becoming ill or passing away and if they are not satisfied then they should refuse the loan - PPI cannot be made a condition of the loan. Unfortunately in many cases I have come across there is little evidence on either side of what was said at the time. This makes proving things very difficult. Asking for S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) may disclose something but often it will be the client's word against that of the Bank. In these circumstances t is vital to try and remember how the original application proceeded. I wrote down everything I could remember and went back to the notes many times and each time found that I could add little bits I had forgotten about.

If you go to the CC and it is your word against the Bank remember that the case will be decided on the balance of probablities so information about the Bank's onerous target system for its employees may be helpful.

There are several other reasons why a policy may have been mis-sold most of which I have had to explore over the last year but I've probably gone on too long as it is. Feel free to contact me if I can help and although I can't guarantee a speedy response I'll do my best!

[reidnet]

Tonight with Trevor McDonald The date for the screening of this program has now been changed to 1 week earlier..12th January 2007.

I had film crew etc here this morning..

Ian