Consumer Action Group envelope labels
You are part of a community of over 195,000 people. Let your bank know that you won't give in. Display one of our labels on your envelopes. Full description here
Sheet of 20 self-adhesive envelope labels £3.50 inc p&p
|
Do your Internet search here Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK
reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE
| | | | Do your Internet search here:-
|
Come and chat with us here (NB: External site NOT affiliated with CAG)
| | | CAG Announcements | |
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ.
You will have to register before you can post.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old? This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide Bought an extended warranty? Not satisfied?
The warranty may be an example of unfair trading
See our new Unfair Trading Guide Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out Are you a victim of unfair trading? Check it out The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regs 2008 Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | | | | | | | Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) The misselling of Payment Protection Insurance is widespread, and believed to run into billions of pounds. This forum will help you to see if you have a valid claim for a refund, and guide you through the process. | Welcome to The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group
Before beginning to claim your bank charges be sure to read the FAQ by clicking the link above. Read it carefully and also read as much of the forum material as you can manage before you start claiming your bank charges refund.
You will have to register before you can post or view the materials which may assist you in reclaiming your penalty charges: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. Understand what you are doing and you will be able to Reclaim the Right more effectively.
Why don't you come and introduce yourself in the Welcome section at the top of the forum. Then have a look around the rest of it.
Do not post or start claiming until you have read the entire FAQ section and step by step guides and you have a good basic idea of what to do and of the layout of the forum.
Good luck claiming your bank charges. We strongly suggest that you register under a UserID and not your own name |  | |
20th March 2008, 07:47
|
#2 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer | Re: Mr P V Egg Ccrp Quote:
Originally Posted by phatram After helping my wife to beat the Egg, I am now going after them for my CCRP(PPI), which with interest at 22.9% amounts to 1.5k.
I was never told I could get this insurance anywhere else, so I believe I was mis-sold this . | Hello phatram,
Glad to see you back and good luck  |
| |
27th March 2008, 19:33
|
#5 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer | Re: Mr P V Egg Ccrp Quote:
Originally Posted by phatram egg.com >•cards >•loans > mortgages > savings > investments *• insurance > egg TM Private and Confidential This letter is about your complaint It was sent to you on 26 March 2008 Reference EGG We've received your complaint Dear Mr P Re: Your Egg account I'm sorry that you have had to complain to us, We will start to work on your case right away and one of our Customer Relations Advisers will ring you to discuss your complaint in detail. If you need to contact us in the meantime, don't hesitate to use the contact details at the side of this letter. However, can you please ensure your contact details are up to date by logging into your account via the website. We will do everything we can to resolve this with you as quickly as possible. Here are the timescales that our regulator, the Financial Services Authority, requires us to work to. in the vast majority of cases we resolve problems a lot quicker than this: • We will acknowledge your complaint promptly, but no later than five business days from receipt of your complaint. • If we are unable to resolve your complaint within four weeks of receipt, we will contact you and explain why. We will also give you an indication of when we will next be in touch. • If we are unable to resolve your complaint to your satisfaction within eight weeks of receipt, we must contact you again and explain why. You can then (or sooner if you do not accept our earlier resolution) exercise your right to take your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service. You have six months from the date of our resolution to do this. Thank you for letting us know about the problems you have experienced and for the opportunity to put things right. Yours sincerely Jeanette Hadfield Customer Relations Office Egg pic | Hello Phatram,
What a lovely standard template letter they have sent you  Please be mindful regarding the phone call that you will received from one of their customer advisors. They can state anything and possibly may or may not record the conversation. Personally I would ask them to correspond in letter only or you record the conversation  . |
| |
4th April 2008, 17:01
|
#9 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer | Re: Mr P V Egg Ccrp Quote:
Originally Posted by phatram What my findings are after investigating it • You originally opted in to having card repayment protection when you applied for your Egg Card Account on the 16 July 2002. I have enclosed a copy of the data which is transferred from your online application. This data cannot be adjusted or manipulated by Egg personnel. I have blanked out some of the more sensitive information for security reasons. At the end of your application online, you would have been presented with a screen with two boxes, one says 'Yes' next to it and one says 'No'. Neither of these boxes were pre-selected.
But you failed to tell me I could get this cover elsewhere and a darn sight cheaper, so you mis-sold it to me !
Part acceptance letter and LBA will soon be on its way. | Should I inform them this is the reason for me making this claim or should I save it for court ? |
| |
8th April 2008, 13:22
|
#11 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer | Re: Mr P V Egg Ccrp Quote:
Originally Posted by phatram Should I inform them this is the reason for me making this claim or should I save it for court ? |
Anyone please. |
| |
23rd April 2008, 15:35
|
#12 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer | Re: Mr P V Egg Ccrp This POC will be used in my claim against Egg for repayment of missold credit card repayment protector / CCRP/(PPI).
My main argument is that they didn't tell me I could get this insurance elsewhere or that I would end up paying interest on it. PARTICULARS OF CLAIM 1. The Claimant had a credit agreement, credit card number xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx ("the Agreement") with the Defendant which was opened on or around July 2002. 2. At the time of opening the account the Defendant misled the Claimant into procuring Payment Protection Insurance ("the Insurance") as part of the overall credit bargain. 3. The Claimant contends that:
a) The Insurance imposed upon the Claimant were neither defined nor explained, nor alternatives from other suppliers suggested.
b) The Claimant further contends that if the Insurance was applied correctly, that the Agreement was not executed in accordance with the Consumer Credit Act 1974; i) As the Insurance was in fact a charge for credit on the Conditional Sale Agreement, it could not also be part of the credit on the additional insurances agreement as under section 9 (4) CCA credit charges cannot be treated as credit even where time is given for their payments ii) If the Insurance was not a charge for credit in respect of the Conditional Sale Agreement, as it was compulsory, it was a charge for credit on the additional insurances and under section 9 (4) CCA credit charges cannot be treated as credit iii) For the reasons stated in either (i) or (ii) above, the agreement for additional insurances failed to state the correct amount of credit and did not comply with paragraph 2, schedule 6, which requires that regulated agreements contain as a prescribed term stating the correct amount of credit iv) The agreement for additional insurances was therefore improperly executed under section 61 (1)(a) of the CCA. 4. Accordingly the Claimant asks: a) The Court finds that the Defendant acted in a way grossly contravening ordinary principles of fair dealing and reopens the credit bargain to perform restitution to rectify the unjust enrichment performed, to the detriment of the Claimant by the sum of £1641.91 by conferring a benefit under an ineffective transaction. b) If the Court is unable to perform restitution, then the Claimant seeks damages of £1641.91 by virtue of the Defendants’ actions, be they fraudulently or mistakenly, in obtaining the Insurances. c) Alternatively, the Claimant seeks damages of £1641.91 in regards to the Defendants clear breach of the Claimants human rights as prescribed by Article 1 of the first protocol of the Human Rights Act 1998 whereby the Defendants actions did cause the Claimant to suffer personal loss to the sum of £1641.91 d) Court costs; e) The Claimant claims i)Compound interest on the charges applied thereon to the Claimant’s account (“the principal claim”), at the annual rate of 22.9 %. This is the rate applied by the Defendant to the Claimant’s unauthorised use or borrowing of the Defendant’s monies, as provided for in the contract.
The Claimant’s case for claiming this rate is based in equity, and a legal requirement for fairness and balance.
The Claimant deems the Defendant’s principal indebtedness to the claimant to be unauthorised, since it is comprised of insurance charges that were imposed upon the Claimant, they were not explained and were in fact mis-sold, not advising the Claimant that alternative products were available elsewhere. ii) In the alternative to e i), if the Court is unable to agree that the claimant is entitled to the contractual rates of interest, on the grounds stated, the Claimant avers that the defendant would be unjustly enriched if the Claimant’s entitlement was limited to the statutory rate of interest in that the defendant has had use of the sums and would have used these sums to re-lend at commercially compounded rates. On these grounds the Claimant seeks restitution of the compounded contractual interest at the defendant’s authorised borrowing rate of 22.9 % per annum. iii) In the alternative to e i) and ii), if the Court finds that the Claimant is not entitled to contractual interest, the Claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984. iv)Schedule showing interest calculated at the rate quoted at I is attached to these particulars of claim, as follows: Schedule A - Compound Contractual Interest calculated at 22.9%. |
| |
1st May 2008, 14:27
|
#14 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Customer | |