Similar sympathy.
And frustration with a system that is constantly being abused in its workings by Local Government departments and their Civil servants whose only aim is to gain revenue sooner than properly serve the actual needs of the people they are paid to serve.
Odd, and contradictory, thoughts on the basis payment was actually made (not positive from above) -
A. Does the act of payment constitute full and
final acceptance of the contravention and liability?
B. Can claims be made that the payment was made under duress (of increasing penalties and/or legal proceedings) and as such does not constitute the acceptance?
Whatever the answer(s), I don't know. But maybe a claim for repayment of the money can be persued through
County Court system on the basis of having only been paid under duress.
Only an idea.
Others here will know better than I and hopefully will assist you in achieving Justice sooner than Arun's bureaucratic victory.
Personally I like Ting's suggestion of seeking their policy of discretion (which I believe exists under Regulations) and add the hint of maximum local publicity if a satisfactory reply is not promptly forthcoming.
Probably a No-No for relationships (and as he is still driving), but can you claim that your Father paid not only under duress but also because he was not 'compus mentis' at the time/circumstances? (and I resent this path, being myself only 11 younger than him!)