Private Parking - Clarification

perky2 · 16th March 2008, 18:44

I have been away from the forums for a while but I understand you have been kept entertained by a good friend of mine, until he allowed himself to get involved in personal arguments despite being told just to ignore.

This may or may not be of interest to some of you but I have been working to try and get a case high enough up the legal chain in order for some of the myths about private parking to be cleared up and I am making good progress.

We recently won a case and it went to appeal in front of a circuit judge, the appeal was dismissed (found again in our favour) and an application has been lodged for the case to progress to the court of appeal on 2 grounds:

-> The parking charge levied was deemed unfair under UCCTR
-> The identity of the driver and the correct procedure for establising this.

The initial appeal request to the Judge was denied.

The appeal papers were lodged on Friday together with the fees and skeleton legal arguments, I understand the transcripts have been ordered and will follow in a few weeks.

For those who have an 'open mind' will be interested in this and I will keep you updated.

freakyleaky · 16th March 2008, 19:20

[quote=perky2;1428256]

We recently won a case and it went to appeal in front of a circuit judge, quote]

Sorry but who are "We"? Which side are you on, so to speak?

pin1onu · 16th March 2008, 21:18

I[quote=freakyleaky;1428320]

Quote:

Originally Posted by perky2

We recently won a case and it went to appeal in front of a circuit judge, quote]

Sorry but who are "We"? Which side are you on, so to speak?

I think we are seeing references to our everybodies favourite PPC Troll formally known as Perky88 and his faithful sidekick Interesting. (For the record Perky runs a PPC.)

At the risk of Troll feeding.........

Come on Perky you're full of we've done this and we've done that. Let's not have any more of your usual BS. If you've been truly been to court then you'll know the importance of providing evidence to back up your claims. Chapter and Verse and Case reference etc, Dates, Times.

Bernie_the_Bolt · 16th March 2008, 23:13

We should hear what Perky has to say IMHO.

"Know thy enemy"

Perky3 · 16th March 2008, 23:47

Anyone who has taken the trouble to research the matter will discover that private parking tickets are legally unenforcable, when properly defended. One must assume that the defendant in this alleged case did not mount an adequate defence. This is indeed clear from what we are asked to believe are the grounds of appeal - no reference to penalty charges, no reference to signage, no reference to issues relating to RK/driver other than identity of driver. All in all a bit of a damp squib and not something to brag about it seems to me.

realperky · 17th March 2008, 00:12

I disagree with both of my namesakes. I think that while private parking tickets may indeed be legally unenforcable, this does not extend to tickets issued by Perky. For you see Perky is the all seeing eye of private parking control, issuing tickets with such deftness of language and contractual sureness of warning signage that the law is put to one side and all stand back to wonder how he does it. Like Billy Flynn he brings on the ol' razzle dazzle. County court, High Court, House of Lords, Supreme Court of the Universe - all bow down to majestic Perky.

Bernie_the_Bolt · 17th March 2008, 00:48

I'm Perky and so's my wife!

In truth, I don't think that people attempting to pass themselves off as another adds an iota of benefit to anyone alse on this or any other debate. If you cannot defeat an argument face on then many would say you've lost it.

realperky · 17th March 2008, 10:30

Ah, but you're assuming one of us is the real Perky and the others impostors. If Perky2 is the "real Perky", why did he change his username (from Perky)? Anyone call call themselves anything on these forums - it does not mean they are who they say they are. The statements by "Perky2" do not make sense from a legal point of view. I can say without any hesitation that I am full of perkiness and I was not aware that any individual had trademarked this word which is in common usage.

I think that being Perky may actually be a state of mind, more than a name. I would describe it as follows:

"Having an asbolutely rigid belief in ones self importance and legal brilliance and ability to pass off invoices of dubious validity as watertight binding contracts."

There may well be other Perkies lurking about I fear.

Alianmid · 17th March 2008, 11:09

Seems to me that the pesky Perky clan are trying to play mind games..........How infantile! How transparent!

green_and_mean · 17th March 2008, 12:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by realperky

Ah, but you're assuming one of us is the real Perky and the others impostors. If Perky2 is the "real Perky", why did he change his username (from Perky)?

I thought 'Perky' (the original one) got suspended? Why don't you use Perky if you are the real 'Perky' lol??

perky1 · 17th March 2008, 12:40

If Perky was suspended then how has he been allowed to post again? My view is all Perkies are created equal and should be allowed to go peacably about their business. This gross abuse of perkies should stop.

ukaviator · 17th March 2008, 12:42

"The Real Slim Perky"

May I have your attention please?
May I have your attention please?
Will the real Slim Perky please stand up?
I repeat, will the real Slim Perky please stand up?

Chorus

'Cause I'm Slim Perky, yes I'm the real Perky
All you other Perky's are just imitating
So won't the real Slim Perky please stand up,
please stand up, please stand up?

green_and_mean · 17th March 2008, 15:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by perky1

If Perky was suspended then how has he been allowed to post again? My view is all Perkies are created equal and should be allowed to go peacably about their business. This gross abuse of perkies should stop.

I didn't realise he had?

Gertie100 · 17th March 2008, 18:01

Ha Ha! Made me laugh before I go home for tea!!!!!!!

Really if you haven't got anything else to do perky then I have a huge pile of ironing!!!!!

Conniff · 18th March 2008, 07:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pin1onu

I think we are seeing references to our everybodies favourite PPC Troll formally known as Perky88 and his faithful sidekick Interesting. (For the record Perky runs a PPC.)

At the risk of Troll feeding.........

Come on Perky you're full of we've done this and we've done that. Let's not have any more of your usual BS. If you've been truly been to court then you'll know the importance of providing evidence to back up your claims. Chapter and Verse and Case reference etc, Dates, Times.

It's almost funny how the subject gets changed when asked for the above to back up rantings and trollisms.

Quote:

(For the record Perky runs a PPC.)

Or maybe his is just the teaboy which is why he never backs up what he spouts.

freakyleaky · 18th March 2008, 09:43

Hi Conniff. I don't know how you did that but the quote on your last post shows it was me who said that, when infact it was Pin1onu.

Conniff · 18th March 2008, 09:48

Sorry about that freaky, I don't know how I did it either, but I have edited to show the correct poster, thanks.

CAG Products - We think that these will help you to make your claim or Reclaim your Right These sales also help us to keep helping YOU and keeps this site free of third party adverts!

Small Claims Kit	Small Claims Court Guide New Edition	CallBurner - Skype CallRecorder Review	Last Will & Testament Kit	Fight a Motoring Ticket

Alternatively you could purchase a CAG email address here, or maybe you'd prefer our address labels here
UPDATE: Consumer Forums ConsumerWiki is now LIVE - click here: ConsumerWiki N.B. Please note - due to postage costs these products are only available in the U.K.