Does;
Quote:
| Wrote to banks with provisional views on fairness |
And;
Quote:
| Depends on outcome of investigation & banks engagement |
Mean that if the Banks agree with the OFT on the issue of fairness (and, presumably, the OFT's recommendations to make the system fairer for consumers) that a deal will be done "behind closed doors" and we will only see the fallout?
Also, if the Banks don't agree with the OFT (or their recommendations, if they have made them) what is the point of muddying the waters by issuing this timelime that suggests a deal is about to be done, exactly?
By the way, I have read point 6, but I'm suspicious and don't believe what has been said is right, which is why I'm asking the question here.
__________________
Always happy to help where I can - and sometimes where I can't! 
Chris It was Winston Churchill who said;
"Democracy is the worst way to run a country except for all the others"
Advice and comments given are entirely my opinion, have no reflection on anyone (including CAG!) other than me, and are offered purely without prejudice. You should always seek legal advice from a qualified legal advisor, as the risks can sometimes not be worth the reward! Taking advice from a public forum can be very dangerous, as it usually comes from the experience of others and each complaint/claim/case is individual in it's own right. Please don't PM me and await a reply, as I may be too late with a reply. (I get a lot of PM's!) Instead, ask your questions in your thread. If you don't have a thread, why not create one? There's a beginners guide linked below that will tell you how. USEFUL LINKS;
(Please read these, as it will likely answer any questions you have)
OFT Bank Charges Q&A Update 14/08/08 
