consumer forums consumerforums Total Bank Charges Returned : £16595128 to 9717 people. The Consumer Forums  
Bank Charges Refunds Survey | 'Buddy' System | Get an email address | Site Map | Registration Problems | FAQ


CAG Products - We think that these will help you to make your claim or Reclaim your Right

These sales also help us to keep helping YOU and keeps this site free of third party adverts!

Small Claims Kit Small Claims Court Guide CallBurner - Skype
CallRecorder Review
Last Will & Testament Kit Fight a Motoring Ticket
 
Alternatively you could purchase a CAG email address here, or maybe you'd prefer our address labels here


UPDATE: Consumer Forums ConsumerWiki is now LIVE - click here: ConsumerWiki

N.B. Please note - due to postage costs these products are only available in the U.K.



Consumer Action Group envelope labels
You are part of a community of over 185,000 people.
Let your bank know that you won't give in.
Display one of our labels on your envelopes.
Full description here
Sheet of 20 self-adhesive envelope labels
£3.50 inc p&p





Reclaim the Right!
The Lawpack Small Claims Kit contains everything you need to get your bank charges refund. Sample forms, Instruction manual, template forms and an entire set of court forms in .PDF format on CDRom.

Just type in the details of your claim and print them out.


Reclaim the Right!


Sue your bank as often as you like with one Lawpack!!

With a Lawpack and Patricia Pearl’s book on Small Claims, you have everything you need to get your unfair bank charges refunded or assert other consumer rights.
(England & Wales only)

CAG Forum Users Price £11.99
(click image to buy)
Plus £1 P&P



Reclaim the Right!


Small Claims Procedure by Judge Patricia Pearl
An excellent guide for the layperson
Not for use in Scotland
Read BF's Review Here




Stand up to Telephone Harassment

If you use Skype -
Record your phone calls with CallBurner
It's Hot!

Click below to download your
14 day trial copy
CallBurner
Skype CallRecorder download


Read the
Explanation and review here
£31.96 - includes 20% CAG discount
(normally £39.95)

We've managed to negotiate a discount for CAG Users on DIY 'Willpacks'


Click on the image to purchase a Wills kit - £12.99 + £1.00 pp

Remember...you can't take your reclaimed bank charges with you ;-)



Do your Internet search here



Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK
reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE
Do your Internet search here:-
Come and chat with us here (NB: External site NOT affiliated with CAG)

  CAG Announcements
 
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ. You will have to register before you can post. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old?
This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide
Bought an extended warranty?
Not satisfied?
The warranty may be an example of unfair trading
See our new Unfair Trading Guide
Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file?
Check it out
Are you a victim of unfair trading?
Check it out
The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regs 2008
Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file?
Check it out
 
Bank Action Group Debt Action Group
 

Go Back   The Consumer Forums > The Consumer Forums
The Consumer Action Group
> Campaign > OFT Test Case Updates and Discussion

OFT Test Case Updates and Discussion This is the place to post any updates on the OFT v Banks Test Case, or to discuss issues relating to this case.


Welcome to The Consumer Action Group

and
The Bank Action Group


Before beginning to claim your bank charges be sure to read the FAQ by clicking the link above. Read it carefully and also read as much of the forum material as you can manage before you start claiming your bank charges refund. You will have to register before you can post or view the materials which may assist you in reclaiming your penalty charges: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. Understand what you are doing and you will be able to Reclaim the Right more effectively.

Why don't you come and introduce yourself in the Welcome section at the top of the forum. Then have a look around the rest of it.
Do not post or start claiming until you have read the entire FAQ section and step by step guides and you have a good basic idea of what to do and of the layout of the forum.
Good luck claiming your bank charges.
We strongly suggest that you register under a UserID and not your own name

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10th July 2008, 23:00   #21 (permalink)
JOSH_IOU
Platinum Account Customer
 
JOSH_IOU's Avatar
Default Re: FSA and Hardship

Hi Jansus thanks for that.
Have these letters been posted to CAG yet?
JOSH_IOU is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2008, 23:02   #22 (permalink)
JOSH_IOU
Platinum Account Customer
 
JOSH_IOU's Avatar
Default Re: FSA and Hardship

I thought I would post the Waiver for easy reference.
JOSH_IOU is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2008, 23:09   #23 (permalink)
jansus
Platinum Account Customer
 
jansus's Avatar
Default Re: FSA and Hardship

An idea - any comments from mods and others?


there were ome definitions and discussions on this thread - old I know - but nothing much has changed .

No the letters are not on CAG but Banking code authority have also been involved - but of course banking code is voluntary anyway
jansus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10th July 2008, 23:29   #24 (permalink)
JOSH_IOU
Platinum Account Customer
 
JOSH_IOU's Avatar
Default Re: FSA and Hardship

Yes The banking code is volunatry My personal opinion is there should be a mandatory code that the banks subscribe to. A code in the consumers best interests.

Not only this but if they dont subscribe to it they either loose there licence or they scrub up and follow the code.

There should be something that protects individuals that are in recipt of state benefits.(automatically) (Obviously when we are dealling with the recovery of bank debt and the opening and closing of accounts.)

Also I think that those that are in an IVA or a debt management programme should be able to get the same level of protection.

The legislation should governm IVA's and Debt Management. So that if you are in one of these the organisation running either one could apply for the return of the charges. Either to the FOS or to the court.

That is one of the things I think should happen.
JOSH_IOU is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2008, 14:05   #25 (permalink)
tawnyowl
Gold Account Customer
Default Re: FSA and Hardship

Quote:
Originally Posted by woodwa5 View Post
tawnyowl,
you do know the court case doesn't cover business accounts don't you? if you didn't you need to claim on that asap
Getting slightly confused.I thought business claims would be better put on hold due to the argument about common law or something like that.If i have made mistake about that i will carry on.Does common law apply to business claims,or is that being argued as well.If i am talking rubbish i will edit .
tawnyowl is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2008, 15:15   #26 (permalink)
JOSH_IOU
Platinum Account Customer
 
JOSH_IOU's Avatar
Default Re: FSA and Hardship

tawny the FSA are aware of the argument.

They did however leave business claims from the waiver.

The waiver is there to give the banks a sort of protection while they pursue the case in court.

We have to remember that the waiver is designed for perosnal current accounts.

This is why the banks are calling there basic accounts current accounts.
They changed the name of the account from Basic to there own named account.

One has to ask if the basic accounts they opend had a credit check on them. My understanding of the sittuation says that basic accounts dont have a credit check on them. Or did not have a one on them.

Banks are supposed to credit check a client once they recive the aplication before the account is opend. To comply with money laundering regulations.

However the fact still stands Business account claims are not part of the waiver.
JOSH_IOU is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2008, 15:34   #27 (permalink)
tawnyowl
Gold Account Customer
Default Re: FSA and Hardship

Thanks-i think i want common law applied to personal accounts-then also applied to business accounts then surely everyone could get on with their claims-we could collect and get on with spending the money.There surely can only be one final decision.The banks will lose.
It worries me that month by month people must be losing money due to the 6 year rule.If they are making 3.5 billion a year now and have been doing for years from charges alone,all they have to do is keep appealing stalling and whatever-and everyone loses apart from the banks if they keep it going for a few years.Thankyou for helping,i find a lot of it hard to follow but will carry on following thread closely.I have also noticed the charges interest is begining to spread world wide.Good.
Hardship grounds to me speak for themselves there are millions surely in this position.Another reason for the banks to make it difficult.
Suppose this is a simple view of things.
I will carry on with business claim shortly

Last edited by tawnyowl; 11th July 2008 at 15:39.
tawnyowl is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2008, 15:51   #28 (permalink)
JOSH_IOU
Platinum Account Customer
 
JOSH_IOU's Avatar
Default Re: FSA and Hardship

Hi again tawny.

This is why we urge evryone to take the banks to court now.

It is my understanding that the 6 year rule that stops someone from complaining about a debt of over 6 years would not apply in this instance.

Because your claim would already be in court I do not think that the court would discount those charges.

But if you do not bring the claim to court then you would lose out on the money.
JOSH_IOU is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11th July 2008, 16:07   #29 (permalink)
tawnyowl
Gold Account Customer
Default Re: FSA and Hardship

Thankyou once again.Now where is that pen.Get the cases to court stageThanks Tawny
tawnyowl is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21st July 2008, 13:06   #30 (permalink)
mopster
Basic Account Customer
Default Re: FSA and Hardship

for info - FSA press release FSA/PN/073/2008 21 July 2008 The Financial Services Authority (FSA) today issued a new waiver from its complaints handling rules regarding unauthorised overdraft charges. The waiver replaces an existing one, which expires on 26 July 2008, and has been offered to those firms who signed up to the previous waiver. This represents approximately 98% of the market. Signatories will not be required to handle complaints relating to unauthorised overdraft charges within the time limits set out in the Dispute Resolution manual. The key points of the waiver include: * A duration of six months and a review early in 2009; * Continuation of the FSA’s consumer protection measures including record keeping requirements and a suspension of the limitation period for making a complaint; * Additional guidance on the identification of those complainants in financial difficulty; * Enhanced monitoring of firms focussing on consumers’ experience whilst the waiver is in place. Dan Waters, Director, Retail Policy, said: "The FSA continues to work closely with the OFT and banks in reaching a resolution on the fairness of unauthorised overdraft charges. Our objectives continue to be certainty over this complex issue, and a fair and consistent resolution of consumer complaints about unauthorised overdraft charges. The FSA has reviewed the prevailing circumstances and has decided to offer firms a new waiver. The waiver will be for six months, when we expect to have a decision from the Court of Appeal." The FSA can revoke the waiver at any time if it considers a waiver is no longer appropriate, for example, if it no longer provides adequate consumer protection, or material progress is not being made in the test case, or a firm fails to comply with the conditions set out in the waiver. The FSA first granted a waiver for 12 months from its complaints handling rules regarding unauthorised overdraft charges in July 2007. The waiver means that while it is in operation, any bank or building society granted the waiver will not be required to handle this type of complaint within the time limits set out in the FSA rules. The county courts have 'stayed' cases referred to them and the Financial Ombudsman Service has adopted a similar approach. Notes for editors 1. The waivers are available on the FSA website. 2. The FSA regulates the financial services industry and has four objectives under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000: maintaining market confidence; promoting public understanding of the financial system; securing the appropriate degree of protection for consumers; and fighting financial crime. 3. The FSA aims to promote efficient, orderly and fair markets, help retail consumers achieve a fair deal and improve its business capability and effectiveness.
mopster is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21st July 2008, 13:06   #31 (permalink)
mopster
Basic Account Customer
Default Re: FSA and Hardship

apologies for lack of formatting
mopster is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 21st July 2008, 13:19   #32 (permalink)
JOSH_IOU
Platinum Account Customer
 
JOSH_IOU's Avatar
Default Re: FSA and Hardship

Promoting public understanding they must be joking right.

Either that or they are failing beond words.

You no I dont think any firm is being fair. What is a hardship case? There seems to be alot of confusion from where I am standing.
JOSH_IOU is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008, 18:14   #33 (permalink)
veester
Basic Account Customer
 
veester's Avatar
 
Watch out, there are Claims Touts about!

Challenge your credit file?

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 147
veester Novitiate
Default Re: FSA and Hardship

Fair banks??? In the same sentence....
They provide a service we have to have.
They abuse that power.
They subscribe (voluntarly aka when they feel like it) to a code that insures they apply a draconian approach to debt and hardship.

They are using the waiver to change T&Cs to ensure that when the nice middle ground is agreed in the courts, we all still get screwed just for less!
veester is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2008, 21:44   #34 (permalink)
Bigmac versus
Platinum Account Customer
 
Watch out, there are Claims Touts about!

Challenge your credit file?

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,989
Bigmac versus Highly informativeBigmac versus Highly informativeBigmac versus Highly informativeBigmac versus Highly informativeBigmac versus Highly informativeBigmac versus Highly informativeBigmac versus Highly informative
Default Re: FSA and Hardship

Absolute joke I agree. Protect consumers? Where is the protection for consumers from the FSA?

No action against banks breaking the waiver conditions leaves no doubt as to who the FSA are protecting.

They should change their main objectives to protecting the banking industry than at least the waiver would make sense.

I truly believe the result will be the same in the end but that is no help to the many peeps who are currently feeling the pinch and the banks know it. Im surprised they havent dangled carrots in front of many to reduce their eventual payout but I suppose theres time yet.

The allowance of the waiver extension is a disgrace especially to those who have cases stayed or sisted and is in disregard to claimants human rights to a fair trial within a reasonable period of time. Is 18 months a reasonable period of time to wait?

Grrrrrrrrrrrrr.
Bigmac versus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2008, 11:29   #35 (permalink)
MARTIN3030
Site Team
 
MARTIN3030's Avatar
Default Re: FSA and Hardship

Recently I have heard about 2 claimants that have cited hardship and informed their banks of this.
In one case its taken them 9 weeks to send out a response and a form for them to fill out requesting financial details.
Given that he has to then return it and await further response it seems that its not the level playing field that it should be.The extension of the 8 weeks liason period as allowed within the waiver does not appear as an exclusion to hardship cases-merely the word sympathetic is used to determine how hardship should be treated.
In view of this and after discussing it-I think we need to have a copy of the means enquiry/financial status form available on the site so that claimants who wish to cite hardship can send it along with a letter.Hopefully this will then cut out weeks,and they will be obliged to act more speedily-given that they have been provided with evidence of it.
MARTIN3030 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2008, 14:37   #36 (permalink)
yourbank
Platinum Account Customer
 
yourbank's Avatar
 
Watch out, there are Claims Touts about!

Challenge your credit file?

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 960
yourbank Informativeyourbank Informativeyourbank Informativeyourbank Informativeyourbank Informative
Default Re: FSA and Hardship

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Re...sp_monthly.pdf
waiver conditions above.
When i started this thread I knew a provision was due to go into the waiver on £500 mark. For reference, see above annex 2 section 3(vii).
No one was really that bothered. Comments made on this thread are sometimes why I don't make more comments. Sometimes you need to work with the devil to produce results in spite of what the devil has done to you. Anyway, at least, something is being done after the fact to reduce times in which people who are claiming hardship will get a response.
I will leave this thread alone now I think.
yourbank is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2008, 15:47   #37 (permalink)
MARTIN3030
Site Team
 
MARTIN3030's Avatar
Default Re: FSA and Hardship

Thank you YB.
You have been with Cag long enough to know how things are digested and when its time to move away to other things.At least theres been food for thought and of course people are now much more informed.
MARTIN3030 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote