Landlord aware of that

Yes I have told the solicitor to stop leases process

Yes they have given personal guarantee in writing. one of the buyer do own the house as well solicitor only dealing with lease agreement and he doesn’t deal with civil matters.so he is unable to help on this matter There is 1 middle men who took the responsibility for them but they are not listening to him as well and he advised me to change the lock and stop their entry.

Yes it’s restaurant business business is by the person I have sold . I am transferring lease to his name I have spoken to my solicitor lease is still in process. But he said I can’t remove him from lease without buyer permission. buyer is in breach of agreement.they have intentions to pay money at all . Landlord is happy to remove him from leas and leave my name . Landlord clearly said I know you and you bought the business from me not the other person (landlord were running his own business) At the moment lease is just contract nothing more pending in land office

Hi I have sold my restaurant business and the buyer is refusing to pay a remaining amount of £45k. I was running a business under limited company and business was sold to limited company. Its 6 months now he is just giving date after date. I am lease holder of the property and the lease is in process for the new buyer. If I take legal action one of his workers told me that if you take legal action against company he wil dissolved the company. I have got another party, they willing buy the business. What are my options? Can i just throw them out of business and change locks etc and sell to the other party. I have got a business debt on my company loan which I am working 7 days a week to just make minimum payment. I need urgent help please. All the equipment was bought by me can I take control of the goods? Restaurant is very busy and they are making but is are paying what they owe me. It was a written agreement signed in front of 3 witness. Kind regards

Hi cags I hired web design company to design my e-commerce store. I have discussed every thing about design time was set for 4 to 5 weeks . Design was not what we discussed specially product pages. They offered to add 30 products and will show me how add ,edit product how to operate site which they never did. 50% deposit was paid and remaining 50% will be payable before go live. once web site gone live i realize issues product image was showing up half awful on mobiles view and tablets. they required remaining balance before the can do any work . I needed go live just don't want create any argue so paid the balance in line that any changes required they will and i have emailed from them to prove . Since they got the money ignorance start no answer my phone calls . so i requested them to provide me admin login details so i can do myself or pay somewhere else to do the work. They refused me admin login details and set up as a user only Stating that they don't give out admin login details their explanation was that you can change what you like and some thing go wrong you will blame on us . its nearly month now this game is going on . last thursday i emailed them that you are leaving with no option to take legal action, their response was go to court and we will take this email as pre-court letter. website is ready to go live . IN their contract i own the website, design ,content after full payment .its wordpress e-commerce and i own the domain myself. They knows that i wanted go live so playing games and causing me potential financial loss . What is my options are? Take legal action against them, and pay some one else to website from scratch and claim the cost from them plus compensations They have no legal right to take my website hostage. when there is no dispute. I am running out from options. any advice will appreciated thanks

and donation is done .thanks for all your help specially slick , dx. Andy, ims.

Hi Andy claim dismissed and thanks for all your help. I was there about 10 minuits . no agreement to prove that account belong to me. final verdict judge said. that documents you requested never send to so claims dismissed. and they are not bothered to attend the hearing carter decided not to attend the hearing only rely on witness statement STRANGE? I will write explain in brief later today.

Thanks Andy I just changed few bits in my defence .I should seek here before submit my witness statement I just changed few bits .that's my witness statement. Can I change my witness statement?its to late and hearing is tomorrow.

any advice andy?

can i argue that unfair term in consumer regulation 1999 that whole claim are based on charges. any reference case laws?

hi dx thats my witness statement

. Paragraph 1 is denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant the claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach as requested by CPR 31. 14 and the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement with the Claimant; and (b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and © show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 2. As per CIVIL PROCEDUE Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 3.0n 28.03.2014 letter bryan carter that account in dispute. 4.ON 03/04/2014 defendant send a letter to freddrickson international that account in dispute. 5.As per witness statement claimant admitted that that credit agreement is regulated by consumer credit 1974.ON 03/04/2014 defendant send a cca request to claimant which claimant fail to comply with and in breach of ss.5(2) 3b 6 and 7 of consumer protection from Unfair trading regulation 2008 CPUTR. 6.,ON 25/07/2014 Defendant send cpr31.14 to claimant and the CLAIMENT failed to comply with my request the claim was not allocated to small track that’s why cpr31.14 did applied. 7.Through out the history of from 2008 till up to date CLAIMENT failed to prove that account is any way reseated to me or show that how defendant reached to amount claimed. several times account was put on hold by claimant on letter dated 22/12/2009 account was placed on hold on letter dated 09/04/2014 was account was placed on hold. 8.on 11/02/2014 defendant received response from claimant of my SAR request based on information from claimant there is such no evidence that defendant had benefited from any services. 9. On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignees of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the COUNSUMER CREDIT ACT Act 1974. 10.. The amount claimed include an early termination charge(s) amounting to the entire balance of the remaining contract. OFCOM guidance states that any Early Termination Charge that is made up of the entire balance if the remaining contract is unlikely to be fair as it fails to take into account the fact that the provider no longer has to provide and pay for their service. 11.. By reason of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief. And fact stated above are true.

so how i go from here any advice? court hearing is on 26/03/2015.

yes i can prove it.its cleary mention default charges.they still don't have any contract .they need to provide something that account belong to me. they admit that agreement is regulated cc1974 point 4 in their witness statement. i did cca them last year .