Jump to content

Hopster

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    389
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral

1 Follower

  1. Hopster

    Hopster v Egg

    Will do - thank you - thank you.
  2. Hopster

    Hopster v Egg

    Thank you for responding. I will advise if and when I get a reply - in the meantime I havereceived yet another letter frm Marlin hreatening further steps. I will try and post any reply to the SB letter - (not sure how to do that !)
  3. Hopster

    Hopster v Egg

    No-one interested ? Oh dear.
  4. Hopster

    Hopster v Egg

    I have now sent the SB letter - is anyone interested in any reply that I my get from Marlin ?
  5. Hopster

    Hopster v Egg

    I am sorry that I have been with my eye "off the ball" for too long but now I am back. I cannot see anything in the letters from the solicitors acting for me that could be described as an acknowledgenment of a debt. I have still not sent a staute barred letter but have printed ne out this evening. Since our last communication I have now received yet another letter from Marlin, this time from Marlin Financial Services "this debt has been passed to us to recover etc" the previous letters were all from Marlin Capital Europe Limited - so it looks as if the action now starts for real. I hate to think of how much interest I would have to pay if I went to court and lost - doesn't bear thinking about - even tho the CCA appears to be a re-constituted one the solicitors have advised that the judge is more than likely to find for the claimant. I think that the Staute bared letter cannot do too much harm in the immediate future - at least Marlin may come back and say why they don't agree. In the meantime I am fielding regular phone calls from them. Have you an opinion for me to digest ? Best wishes Hopster.
  6. Hopster

    Hopster v Egg

    Thank you - May I address this early next week - just off for weekend break ?
  7. Hopster

    Hopster v Egg

    Did not intend to mddle anything - I thought that eferred to a 5 year period when the 6 year period should apply - sorry.
  8. Hopster

    Hopster v Egg

    With the greatest of respect Brigadier you and the Site team are not singing off the same hymn sheet re. SB. Site Team - Would you agree with this ?
  9. Hopster

    Hopster v Egg

    2009 is the date on the crdit file
  10. Hopster

    Hopster v Egg

    No - I did not make an offer to settle the debt - that was another case that I am sruggling with ! I repeat I did not make an offer to Marlin/Egg/Barclaycard. Sorry for the mix up. The only payment made ws for an SAR for which I didn't receive an answer. What is the best way of putting the onus on them to show that it is not SB ? Is there a standard letter on the forum somewhere ? Thx again
  11. Hopster

    Hopster v Egg

    bad spelling - rather bad typing ! wh is where
  12. Hopster

    Hopster v Egg

    Sorry - what is removed and wh plese ? Do you think that I should send marlin a Statute Barred letter in view of previous messages between us ?
  13. Hopster

    Hopster v Egg

    I have just checked and there is a default date on my record of about half of the balance dated March 2009. Is this of any signifiance ?
  14. Hopster

    Hopster v Egg

    Default notice from Egg dated August 2008. I don't know if there is anything diffrent on my credit file - I will see what I can find.
  15. Hopster

    Hopster v Egg

    yes - Marlin - received a letter from them in August 2014 demanding outstanding amount. Prior to this an identical letter in February 2014 and prior to that one in August 2013 Incidentally I did NOT send an offer in May 2011 as I had originally thought (see earlier message). I am tempted to send them a statute barred letter. The only payment to them was £10 SAR request which was never answered. so is anyone actually chasing you? dx
×
×
  • Create New...