Dangermouse
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
106 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
24 ExcellentRecent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Sorry folks it has been a long time since I have logged in to the site. Can anybody quickly let me know why Capstones are now talking about Eurosail applying for repossession?? I seem to recall there was some discussion a year or so ago about possible fraud when mortgages were originally taken out, due to SPML not disclosing that Eurosail were party to the original agreement? Maybe I got confused or maybe something significant has happened that I have missed. Anyone save me from reading through a years worth of thread! Regards to all
-
My darling Crapstone, l think you just nailed it all down in a few beutiful sentences. Better to stay cool and not like me, right now, flaring up in anger. l've stated time after time that there was never any intention of the lender to fullfill his contractual agreement. But, you went around that and formulated the intention better, i.e, intention for the contract to be fullfilled. This is where the entire case rests, if we can prove and we should be able to do so, then we were led to believe we had a straight forward mortgage contract agreement, why, in reality we had a short term loan agreement with the sole intention of either having us to re-mortgage or lose our homes. ln other words, we are the victims of fraud. Super, super Crappis. Gustavius YES YES, You are there now
-
G E Money and Secret Commissions
Dangermouse replied to frustrated46's topic in Mortgages and Secured Loans
Hi Guys I took out an igroup lsecured oan of £30k in 2004 through London & Scottish. I settled it in 2006. Does anyone have any idea whether it is worth sending SAR? Dangermouse -
Thanks Spam I feel very happy, the barrister on the other side was very dejected having been quite snotty before we went in. To make me even happier, the solicitors acting for the other side sent me the account for their costs of today's hearing (received when I got home). Presumably they were expecting that I was going to have to pay their £3.5k! Dangermouse
-
I won Thanks for the advice tx20. Dangermouse
-
I just had a look at the Ministry of Justice website regarding set aside. It states in section 12.3 Conditions to be satisfied " Rule 6.17 provides that where the claim form is served by the Claimant, the Claimant may not obtain default judgment unless a certificate of service has been filed" When I said that the court may have erred, it was because the court itself served the claim form on the defendant & the defendant received it. When I applied for default judgment, the court office stated that I needed to supply a certificate of service. I explained that the court had served the claim & eventually I was given the judgment. Dangermouse
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.