Jump to content

jjvercetti

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral
  1. Hello, I have spoken to the court and they have told me that Lowell did not file the mediation questionnaire in time, that is why the claim was struck out. The court also said that they can apply to have the case reinstated and the court will let me know if this happens. Great..
  2. No I have not received any paperwork at all about this but yes, I will get in touch asap.
  3. I dont know what is happening but on the mcol site it states the Claim was struck out, what does this mean?
  4. Not much of an update, but Lowell were taking long to send the mediation form back. The courts got it after sending them a warning letter. Just awaiting on the call from the mediation people now.
  5. I tell them that i am still waiting for the information I requested when they contact me?
  6. I received the letter on Saturday about mediation, I still did not get the information I asked for from Lowell.
  7. A late update, I received a letter from the court saying that they got my defense. They really take their time, it was dated the 15th but I got the letter yesterday second class post.
  8. Have finished a draft, is this any good? 1.This claim is for £2030.36 the amount due under an agreement between the original creditor and the defendant to provide finance and / or services and / or goods. 2.This debt was assigned to / purchased by Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd on 02/12/2011 and notice served pursuant to the law of property act 1925 Particulars Re:Shop Direct A/C No ******** And the claimant claims £2030.36 The claimant also claims interest pursuant to S69 county court act 1984 from 02/12/2011 to date at 8% per annum amounting to £162.43 Defence 1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. The claim is denied with regards to an amount due under an agreement.The Claimant/Solicitor has refused to disclose any agreement or statements on which its claim relies upon. 3.Paragraph 2 is denied I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served over 3 years ago. 4.It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement with the Claimant; and (b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and © show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 5.As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 6.On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 7.By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
  9. There is nothing to report, It looks like I am not going to receive a reply from them so I am writing a defense to the effect of that.
  10. So I got a notice of claim issue letter from Lowell Solicitors today but it was dated the 19th January, they take their time sending letters but I have still not received the stuff I asked for. Can I ask how much time I have left to submit the defense?
×
×
  • Create New...