Jump to content

jimmyley

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral
  1. I searched mobile repair companies, took addresses down from 192.com and then I went there. They are real but dishonest. Now my worry is that the court is doing nothing about it, even after I forked out more than hundred pounds. This court business looks very shady, they send tiny slips of paper with no reference to who they are, with spelling mistakes, no names and no contacts at all. MCOL customer service passes responsibility around. An embarrassment for an alleged first world country.
  2. What I have is a receipt given by the people who are still working there. If they are trading under a bogus name and passing fake receipts to customers that is against the law and punishable. I specifically wrote in the request for warrant of execution that they are also using the name 'Recover Solutions' and that the manager was a Darren Radley. The court completely ignored this and wrote that the bailiff was told by the new occcupant that the debtor had left and that the bailiff has no information about where the debtor may be. Finally ends with (copied exactly as it is): 'NEW OCCUPIORS: "RECOVER SOLUTIONS"'! If you still think the courts have done their job properly thank you for your time reading this but please keep your opinions private. If otherwise then please can you tell me what have people done when they are dissatisfied with the courts administration?
  3. So, can anybody find any usefull advice on how to make the courts do their job, please?
  4. Thanks but how would I go about and use that information? The major name on the receipt is 'GSM Repairs'. Its website had this written on it: Gsm Repairs is part of R3 Grp Limited. Registered in England & Wales: 06826367 but they removed it about a month ago. The main name in the shop front is 'Recover Solutions' and it also appears in smaller print in the receipt. I was told the boss name is Darren Radley which I passed on to the claim form and the bailiff. The GSM Repairs website had a form which customers would fill and it had 'GSM Repairs' in the header and asked to send to this address Recover Solutions, R3 Grp Limited, 87 Barr Street, Birmingham, West Midlands, B19 3DE but they removed that too, although I kept a copy of everything. That address is the real address. The address of 'R3 Grp Limited' in the Companies House website is close but different.
  5. Brigadier, the name above the door appears in the receipt in small letters. In big letters there is the name in a logo which is the name I filed. That logo appears in a website that in the meanwhile was partially disabled but when I filed the claim it said the company belonged to another company with a corresponding registry number which I checked was valid at the time. I'm not a law or a company structure expert but if the receipt I have is not a valid evidence then I don't see what security a ordinary person has and the courts are perhaps for people who can afford a solicitor.
  6. Brigadier, How can I know that? And it is really down to that? A store can just change name willy nilly and withhold other people's property without consequences?
  7. Well how is a customer supposed to know this? And if this works like this than it's all a mockery at the consumer's expense. A shop can just give receipts away with mickey mouse company names and then if there is any problem they just say the company has moved?!
  8. The address is right I checked personally and the same people who won't give me my phone are working there. The company name I used in the claim is the name in the receipt.
  9. I don't know to whom I can turn now. I filed a claim online for a mobile phone that a shop refused to return and it went up to the bailiff stage. The bailiff said they were no longer there and moved. I went there and they are working as usual! I sent a letter to the bailiff with the receipts I have but I got no reply. I went to my local court but they are saying that it's not their business since the claim was filed online and not transferred to them. I phoned the bailiff court which is in the city where the shop is, and they redirect to a general call centre. At the call centre they only repeat what's on the online system and won't transfer to anybody. I need the mobile and the money I already sunk in this. Help.
  10. Thanks for the reply HB. Are we allowed to speak about those reasons?
  11. Thanks stu for checking it out. I did not as I based the claim on the receipt they gave in the shop which is evidence. These guys appear to be opperating under several different names. But now my main worry is if the court is a serious thing or will they just keep my money and do nothing because I can't even phone them. They just waste your phone money in endless recorded messages loops (read out slowly slow).
  12. To whoever censured and removed my last post: It was irony. It was an exaggeration to highlight an exaggeration of another post, get it? Why was it removed? Also, this is supposed to be a consumer forum but the word **** is automatically replaced without warning?!
  13. Could you please enounce the legal codes where you base what you're saying?
  14. Does it have to be UK? Their user agreement refers to a Luxembourg address.
×
×
  • Create New...