Not sure what you are tring to achieve but I have had every Judicial case for a debt thrown out by law which is incredibly easy for me. By the way, I have dealt with most of the companies Solicitors, Barristers, Magistrates and Judges on here and none of them want to deal with me. Wouldn't mind making a bit of commercial gain to be honest on helping you all as most of my work as been for free settling debts without the person in question having to do anything but either way I've been doing it for 6 years, recently been teaching Barristers and Judicial nominee's the law if that helps? Rick

To register is from regis, latin, ergo legal title is actually owned by the Crown at all times and it's subservient entities unless it is superseded by law and the rights which no entity can encroach upon. That's why my legal documents will look different to yours if they had to be evidenced in a Court of Law. How do you think they can lawfully take it in the first place if you default on a debt/liability and not be prosecuted for an act against your rights for violating them? Come on, that's entry level law that, your (without prejudice or recourse) ignorance must have overlooked that! I'm not a "freeman", never said I was. What I have done however was discharge my debt in one legal case years ago, won 30+ legal matters since I started studying law and economics 5 years ago and have had 2 Courts and 2 Judges throw out claims against me due to lack of jurisdiction. I have no debt's or liabilities to worry about and the last two times I was asked to go to Court they said it was sorted when I got there and not to worry about it as I always used to go over most legal reps heads by law. I do have to have Barristers and Solicitors turn up at my door if they want me to discharge my families debt as the holder in due course but that's no biggy, two minute job. Hopefully those less (wpor) ignorant then will start to understand the law and not legalities, Jurisprudence seems to be classed as being "on your high horse". I bet they don't really know the difference between lawful and legal either. So, good luck.

Is it bad advice telling them that they should register the car in their mums name because when you register something and do not specify you are both legal and equitable owner, then legal title held by, in this case would be a Lower Court, who, it seems to me, believe that it is okay to threaten people and make them worry over such things - not the law I studied!). So, even if it is in Fred Blogs then they have legal title and tell you what to do with it. I had a couple of warrants thrown out from Bury and Manchester Courts as they cannot adhere to the law in such ways. (Disgraceful behaviour, they should read UDHR Article 1 and understand the meaning of the word conscience). I really can't make it any easier for you to sort this matter out once and for all and keep your property. I will copy and paste this from the UN website for you so it sinks in (all rights reserved without prejudice, recourse or notice if anyone thinks I am violating I.P. or Copyright laws - education purposes as well as making sure the law is maintained!) Article 17. (1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others. (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property You all have to stop worrying about these things it will do your health no good, I will bet you any money a Judge would agree with what I have said, these are the reasons laws were created in the first place you know! They still need you to discharge the debt mind but here's a defence for you to stop worrying about these things. Good luck.

Doesn't matter the value really, I have nefarious individuals (my banks lawyers) trying to get Inchoate Instruments from me outside of the good faith principles of contract law against my intangible property and juristic person and all the other tricks of getting a power of attorney over an individual's property I have come to expect. If I received said value and agreed in writing then the discharge non est factum, a holder in due course can do that for me as thats their job and what each party wants. Just read article 17 and ask why the Bailiffs/Courts/Judge, whomever you have to deal with believe they can take your property because they are not allowed to lawfully no matter the reason given in defence. Same applied to your and every mortgage in the country too, just make sure you have th document witnessed, retain a copy (allonge) and send it recorded delivery so you can evidence it in a court of law if need be. Search for UDHR on UN website and read article 17 subsection 2.

It is a criminal offence and you can have them imprisoned for it, even the Court Magistrate or their legal representatives! Pursuant to UDHR Article 17, subsection 2 can no authority or any entity take your property, it must be abitrarily given (read UDHR 17 and that by law supersedes all other legislations under common laws). Tell them you want full culpable signature on any and all documents and under prenalty of perjury as to why they believe they can unlawfully take your property. No one can ever take your property, it must be arbitrarily given, so don't let them, make it unlawful. See any decent legal rep and they will make sure it is not taken or enlighten them to the facts I am stating. Remind the court that they require either an inchoate instrument pursuant to Section 20 of the Bills Of Exchange Act so they can act as the holder in due course or supersede the Contracts (Rights of Third Party's) Act 1999, notably section 6 with UDHR Article 1 and the matter is settled in full without further prejudice, recourse or notice. Remind them that if they do not agree to this they are violating your Convention Rights (to which all primary and subordinate legislation must be read and given effect) and you have a valid law defence and can claim restitution for unlawful malfeasance. By law, no one at all can take your property, EVER! I would expect them to then accept that offer or, asthey seem to like to do, send some instrument in return giving you no lawful equitable resolution pursuant to UDHR Article 1. Regards

Sorry but bad advice flyingdoc! It is actually known as your juristic person or body corporate, has same legal rights as you but not human rights. Courts cannot encroach upon your human rights so it is directed to thi intangible trust entity so said rights are maintained. If it is rubbish then I guess the lawlords were wrong producing the Contracts (Rights of third party's) Act of 1999 which stops unjust enrichment via such things under English Law (section 6). It is known in law as "an assignment of contract for value recieved without recourse or notice" and they felt it was a little too unjust. It's why you've not actually won in court, the liability is just transferred to your jursitic person and those in law settle them whilst your convention rights (too which all primary and subordinate legislation must be read and given effect thereto) are maintained. Don't mean to be offensive, just dont give bad advice you dont know about when people clearly need help. Just read your mortgage for advice, it tells you how to deal with debts! Send the neotiable instrument, now, time I stopped my banks lawyers from getting Inchoate Instruments from me pursuant to section 20 of the Bills of Exchange Act 1882! Far too generous, I should start charging for settling liabilities!