Jump to content

wildm

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    33
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral
  1. Thank you for your advice. The Cameron case opened further doors for even plebs like us, which I exploited. I know the Foi and the one you pay for rules like the back of my hand it's something I have had to learn because i was fed duff info. The ICO have agreed with me, yet the letter received is feeding me the same duff info so off we go again. Very frustrating Grrrrrrrr. I think they think I will get fed up and go away............
  2. I asked foi for stuff similar to that which David Cameron had to disclose in the Rebekah saga. Some of it incurred the cost you state. There are "procedure" as you state but they are obviously not working.......therefore there is no alternative but to complain. I am right back to where I started a very scenic route so off we go again no rest till it is corrected.
  3. I must point out the missing papers that FoI are denying me are the same ones that were purposefully kept from the Tribunal, I hope that makes a bit more sense now.
  4. The Home Office deal with Freedom of Information (FoI) requests. I complained to the Parliamentary Ombudsman (PO) first as the Home Office had not applied the DPA (Data Protection Act) correctly and as a Government Office the PO deal with that and you need your MP to sign the request to the PO. The PO refused to deal with my request as they said they had consulted their legals and it was deemed an employment matter. So I wrote to the Information Commissioner (ICO) telling them that the PO would not deal with the DPA violation and they took the case up and after the Home Office finally responded to them concurred with me that the DPA had indeed not been applied correctly. The ICO said I would receive a response from the Home Office. I received a response from the Home Office which again contained "incorrect statements". I wrote back pointing out and providing evidence of the "inaccuracies" and copying in my MP. Yesterday I received a response from Lord Taylor of Holbeach the Lord Minister and Minister for Criminal Information. The letter was very interesting and will be responded to today point by point. I will no doubt have to do this again via my MP. The denials and outright lies I am issued with continually beggar belief but I will spend yet more precious time sifting through all the previous responses, pointing out the obvious using their own quotes etc. Frankly I find it quite amazing just how many of those who judge/write letters appear to have a complete aversion to reading the papers submitted rendering their judgements/missives entirely nonsensical and contradictory. Fight the good fight and continue to nibble.....
  5. Reminded my MP today.....apparently a response has been received from the Home Office!!! He has posted it to me today. Nothing from the other MP's I addressed queries to yet it seems.
  6. I did one of those once it was about honesty in the Civil Service ha ha. Emotion and the sheer monotony of having to explain everything numerous times and the little interest paid to detail by those making judgements are the things that undo. So many wrongs which to fasten on. it is very frustrating and all because they already know and really do not want to rectify. There is also a change now or change today which avoids the scenic route of local MP's which I will pursue asap.
  7. At the moment I am awaiting responses from MP's they are now over a month old. I initially sent them myself but was ignored apparently you have to ask questions through your local MP or there will be "chaos". The conclusion I am now forced to take is that local MP's are also ignored when the questions are too hard to answer. All I can say is when faced with a gargantuan task just keep nibbling away at it.
  8. Someone on one of these things said I was lying/making, they simply could not believe it. Well neither can I which is why I will never ever stop. Atrocious practices will continue, so when I do stop it will be because things have been fully righted or I am dead. I too am apparently "unemployable" so be it, rather that than let injustice prevail and remain silent. The term is actually black-listed, starved into submission. I spent 33 years' of my life employed by the same people and am a little further along the line than you having exhausted the EAT and JR system. This site was infiltrated by my ex employer or their legal people when I consulted it prior to my Tribunal, the costs judge said I didn't have to pay that bit! Continue to fight the good fight. The systems in place are certainly not fair the EAT in London is as flawed as the ET but something you have to go through. The subsequent JR, though less hostile, was equally useless. I have no option but to fully exhaust their systems, Hillsborough, Lawrence and Savile took 20 years' to be exposed continue to fight the good fight or become bitter.
  9. To clarify. The pigs in trough comment was aimed at doctors, I get fed up with people receiving extras for doing their jobs or not as the case may be. Case in point bankers and their fabulous bonus scheme. Watching the 1949 benefit scheme programme really brought home what the Tories are after .......they had such a long to do list compiled when not in power and they are certainly ploughing their way through it. This country feels more like a fascist state daily.
  10. Dear God, more pigs with their snouts in the trough............first do no harm eh ha ha
  11. not according to the man on tv.........circa 6.15am this morning.
  12. The number to ring the BBC gave out this morning is void what is the number?????????????
  13. I would strongly advise anyone even contemplating an Employment Tribunal claim not to bother. The Tribunal is not even remotely interested in the claimant. They do not read the papers submitted; reduce the time of the trial to suit the other sides commitments; ask the other side their view of work policies instead of reading them themselves even when there are differing views from HR in the bundle; ignore any letters you send prior to the tribunal re non-disclosure or late submission of the bundle; believe everything the employer says and nothing that you say. The Civil Service even snooped into this forum to see what I was saying/looking at or asking. Save yourself the bother and accept that there is no justice for poor people those with money win and that is the fact of it.
  14. There is more than enough equity on the house in fact six times what I need to borrow, but I cannot get a mortgage as the earnings we have at present are not enough for the amount we wish to borrow. The amount we offered to pay was based on only the debtors small pension of £60 a year the form did not ask for any other earnings and so the offer of £60 was not accepted and the court awarded the full amount plus costs and interest be paid. The next step will I suppose be being made to sell the property to pay the debt unless I can get an unsecured loan as the secured loan I asked about was not allowed presumably because of the low income and the CCJ on the house. I am having the property valued tomorrow, spring is allegedly here but I see many houses about me which have been up for sale for years'. I doubt they will sit and wait even though they are earning £76 plus interest per week there are I suppose equity release schemes but these appear to be an even worse course of action though may be the only option I have.
×
×
  • Create New...