Jump to content

jack2uk

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral

1 Follower

  1. is it normal for a judge to award an immediate possession order when the defendant does not turn up to the hearing? i thought the judge told me at the hearing it would be 7 days? any thoughts on this appreciated.
  2. Thanks for that, yes i will apply for Baliffs this week. If he had grounds he would have appeared in court, he claims he was ill..... he would have to prove this surely with a doctors note or something.He is persistant and i can't see him giving up too easily but the judge was happy that the Section 21 was served correctly and in plenty of time elapsed before going to court. so hopefully it should be over soon. thanks
  3. Hi Thanks for your reply. The Possession order says "ForthWith upon service of this order upon him" so am i right in saying that this is an immediate Possesion Order? it does not say 14 days and at the court hearing i did ask for Immediate possession order due to the outstanding arrears (12+ months)
  4. Hi All, I have been going through the courts to gain possession of a room in a house from a non paying tennant, i had my court hearing yesterday and the defendant did not show up (he tried to adjourn hearing but his application was refused as he did not file a defence) anyway the judge gave me possession order and have received an "order for Possession Forthwith upon service of this order upon the defendant" does this mean i can start immediately to apply to the court for a baliff ? if so how long does this procedure take? Will the defendant be able to appeal and do you think he has any chance of success? any help appreciated.
  5. Hi All, I have been going through the courts to gain possession of a room in a house from a non paying tennant, i had my court hearing yesterday and the defendant did not show up (he tried to adjourn hearing but his application was refused as he did not file a defence) anyway the judge gave me possession order and have received an "order for Possession Forthwith upon service of this order upon the defendant" does this mean i can start immediately to apply to the court for a baliff ? if so how long does this procedure take? Will the defendant be able to appeal and do you think he has any chance of success? any help appreciated.
  6. Hey i like your style to just turn up and hand it back to them, but most of these PPC's only have PO BOX Numbers, i wish the one that issued me with a PCN had an office i could turn up to and have a pleasant conversation with
  7. Hey DJXFM, I received the RED Letter from SIP car parks also dated 18 march, its now increased to £132 also payable in 14 days, have a guess what i'm gonna do... tuck it away in the back of the draws with the previous ones and no doubt the future ones.
  8. Hi, Thats the exact same Letter i was issued with a month ago from SIP, i have not responded and have no intention of doing so after all the good advice i receive from you guys on here, i'm expecting a 2nd letter soon, i will keep you informed.
  9. has anybody else had any dealings with this PPC SIP Car parking?
  10. Don't even consider replying to them thieving ****ards, they have nothing to hold you to, they are opportunists [problematic] who need to be eliminated by any means, dont contact them and never reply to them, they will go away.
  11. I've heard that writing an envelope without a stamp with "cheque enclosed" can coist them £1.90 a time? is this worth it?
  12. dont worry i will recommend that any of my friends/associates who are caught up in a similar fraudulent [problem] just never for 1 moment consider paying their crazy penaltys, they could never justify their fees of £120 for staying an extra 15 mins in an empty car park that charges £1 per hour, how dissproportiante is that, thay could never consider going to court , cos they they know they don't have a thread to stand on, lets hit back at these fraudulent companies, how can we hit them where it hurts? any ideas?
  13. Thanks Guys, seems the best way is just to ignore them totally and never respond to their unlawful requests for £117 - they are totally fraudulent companies that should never be allowed to trade and exsist. Cheers Jack
×
×
  • Create New...