DBC
Registered UsersChange your profile picture
-
Posts
2,157 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Most car park "management" is fairly useless anyway, especially when the PPC just relies on ANPR. That will deal with overstaying (apart from "double dipping") but, unless there are feet on the ground, there is no way of ensuring that disabled bays are not misused or that nobody has parked sideways over three bays. The only solution is pay-on-exit with a human patrolling the car park. Finally ( and the government are proposing this) PPC charges must be brought into line with council parking charges and they must not be allowed to charge any more than local authorities.
-
This lack of car-parking space in many Aldi stores is down there policy of building shops on small penny-packets of land that other supermarkets won't touch. This leads to not only small car-parks, but lack of storage space. Hence all the complaints about the aisles full of pallets of stuff, especially at Christmas.
-
Parking Prankster has now blogged about this case. Read and enjoy (especially Trev's "creative accounting") http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/anpr-court-update.html
-
UKPC and fraudulent Photographic "Evidence"
DBC replied to DBC's topic in Private Land Parking Enforcement
UKPC staff are on a bonus scheme and it's in their interest to produce more tickets so they can earn more money. This Parking Prankster blog explains it all:- http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2015/09/uk-parking-control-warden-explains-how.html- 13 replies
-
- evidence
- photographic
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
UKPC and fraudulent Photographic "Evidence"
DBC replied to DBC's topic in Private Land Parking Enforcement
Now featured on the BBC :- http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-lincolnshire-34172701- 13 replies
-
- evidence
- photographic
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
UKPC have finally admitted that some of their "wardens" have been altering the time stamps on photographs used on their PCNs. The "wardens" have been sacked and the loophole in the software has been closed. This was after the company initially said that all the photos were correct, the time stamps could not be altered, and that the motorist would have to pay up. This story has been featured on the BBC, the Sunday Times and by the Parking Prankster. If anyone suspects that they have been the victim of this sharp practice you should contact PPC, but also the BPA and possibly Trading Standards.
- 13 replies
-
- evidence
- photographic
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
There have been a couple of mentions on this forum hinting that the relationship between PE and Morrisons a turned sour and that the new boss of the supermarket is trying to ditch the PPC. Does anyone have more information on this story? Thanks.
-
Bevis case Appeal to Supreme Court Filed
DBC replied to SabreSheep's topic in Private Land Parking Enforcement
Parking Eye do not mention this appeal on their website. They are still gloating on their "win" at the COA. Going on past form, they will probably "forget" to mention the latest appeal in the paperwork they send to motorists and when filing court papers. -
All Parking Eye signs have those meaningless phrases about disabled and P&C drivers "only in marked bays". That could be interpreted as meaning that those category of drivers can only park there and nowhere else. I think a judge even remarked about this at a trial. In the case of PE it's even worse , they say "parent and toddler" . How do you define a "toddler" . Other PPCs set an upper age limit for children in P&C bays. How can a PPC "attendant" (of a PPC ANPR camera) determine the age of a child?
-
Claim form From Civil Enforcement
DBC replied to filrobbo's topic in Private Land Parking Enforcement
That goes against this Parking Pranktster blog:- http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/co-op-confirm-they-have-not-cut-deal.html- 113 replies
-
Claim form From Civil Enforcement
DBC replied to filrobbo's topic in Private Land Parking Enforcement
So who does this "Chris Jones" actually work for , the CO-OP or CEL?- 113 replies
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.