unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx

ignore stop panicking about a whole nothing burger. 100's of threads here. dx

this is not America, don't keep believing what you see on TV or about the USA means that happens here, it DOES NOT. you won't and they can't use character assassination to try and discredit you nor can they access ANYTHING that is not already in the PUBLIC domain about you. none of which you are fretting about are PUBLIC RECORDS. as for 'being arrested = a criminal record' = untrue. where did you ever get that idea from?? it is not publicly available and is only held on police PNC. and no your details cannot be published in a news paper = same rules apply to you as the accused, in fact even more so. you really do appears to be reading some very weird websites..

a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF and have ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter what it's type. moved to the gyms/Health clubs forum. not sure where you get the idea that any ole debt passed to a DCA gives them some magically power to make it appear on credit files..

as i guessed re interest then..they are removing it... has he paid it off then if you add up his payments todate? dx

have a good read in the debt selfhelp forum. its easy to do a self managed one..only on the debts you find ARE enforceable mind..

all of which you could already have answered yourself if you'd been reading up. a DCa is NOT A BAILIFF. yours is not the next move.

ok nothing historic there then. dx

just type no need to keep hitting quote. Natwest dont usually mess around. dx

take out date when did you open the accounts? dx

use the webform if it allows you to attach your evidential documents then do so but do that later depending upon who your bank is.... - but i suspect you will be referred to Mastercard. who is your bank? dx

the process for attaining a charging order is the same no matter what it results in. interim first then latter they can go for a full charging order. at ICO stage its recorded the same on your deeds until a full CO is applied for and granted. however, as in your case, it resulted in simply a restriction k which cannot be converted into a full charging order so the entry remains stating ICO. smart cookies on your side IMHO now ...hope you succeed. dx

so what excuse are you going to use when they find there is a pattern of your use of the childs card going back weeks/months before that day you gave that excuse..... i knew i was going to lose my debit card in a few weeks/months time so i thought i'd start practicing my fraudulent use early? dx

got everything right. stop paying get things defaulted by the issuance of a default notice ASAP. then deal with things once you are settled and your ducks are inline. take out dates for each debt?

not a valid excuse.!! what date did you lose you debit card? dx