Jump to content

Bignayf86

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Posts

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

1 Neutral
  1. yes I did send the log book back, filled it all out appropriately, even before the tax had run out!
  2. Its a load of bull. I've got most of the paperwork and correspondance from start to finish so I will be fighting this all the way! Ive just finished my Letter..
  3. Ok so update time, I received a letter from someone a bit higher up.. Mrs Chadderton. basically saying that i am still liable for it. I will scan the letter in so you can all read it! I am still not happy and have already found some points which there are some discrepancies(sp) with! I will draft the letter I want to send back on here too.. Thats their 2 page letter And my reply: I still have some other points, but is there anything else you can see?!
  4. they have said that my log book is a legal document which supercedes the interpretation act. She told me that on the phone..
  5. ok just thought I'd update you, I got another letter from the wonderful inter-credit today... another template letter I must add It informs me under section 7A of V.E.R.A 1994 i have contravened and may also be liable under s.31A a fine of £1000 isCOMMANDED if convicted. I have drafted a letter to inter-credit, as follows: RE: Case No Dear Sir/Madam, I would love to get into an argument with your wholly unprofessional company, about how you have threatened me with a £1000 fine under a section of a statute which does not exist, or the non-existent statute, section 7A of the Vehicle Excise and Registration Act 1994; but frankly I cannot be bothered. Please, however, find enclosed a letter which I am sending to the DVLA to sort this problem out via the root. This letter declares that I will have no more communication with you regarding this matter. Yours Faithfully
  6. ok, I found the latter by hungrybear on another thread so I'm going to adapt that to my own circumstances. from what i can tell, the DVLA are in the wrong totally.. I will let you know how I get on!
  7. Basically I sold the car with 2 months tax on it, and the car was always off the public highway, on a driveway. The log book was sent off before the tax had even run out. Before July 2009. I received a letter after the 28 days saying the car had not been relicenced. I replied saying I had sent the log book back. 5th November I receive a reply saying it had not been received. 6th November I get the acknowledgement letter. I am determined not to pay it as I served the paperwork to the DVLA. The DCA has said that s.9 of the log book supersedes s.7 of the Interpretation Act.
  8. OKAY thanks, so what should I do regarding the DCA that are on my back now? Call them and request it is transferred back to the DVLA or other?
  9. I sent the paperwork as soon as it was gone. I received a first letter from the DVLA over a month on saying I had not informed them and the car was untaxed on the highway. I responded and told them the car had been scrapped and the paperwork sent off. I then got a reply on the 5th November 2009 saying that I was still liable because of the 28days, had no acknowledgement letter, until the 6th November 2009, when it suddenly appeared! More than just a coincidence I feel... I then left it and it has gone to 2 different DCAs now threatening court summons within 7 days!
  10. I have a similar problem and I have just spoken to the DCA who have said if I dont pay within 7 days they will start court proceedings. The car was scrapped in May last year, the paperwork was sent of via Royal Mail. Now, apparently because I didn't act within 28 days of me sending the log book back, I am the one in the wrong.. Where do I stand?? I do however have an acknowledgement letter dated the 6th November informing me that I informed the DVLA of scrappage/change of owner.
  11. sorry to bump an old thread again, but seemed pointless to open a new one.. I received a parking ticket from ECP.. and I wrote back to fight it, the ticket was issued at 2am, outside my place of work, and i know for a fact the tickets are issued by the security who patrol the shopping centre, not employees of ECP. so they wrote back to me and said that the charge was issued correctly, and i still have to pay £70.. no option to pay the reduced amount.. where do i stand??
  12. I got a phone call now, along with another reply from the Executive Complaints department. BT: broadband, TV, phone, home & business networked IT services is the email for the CEO's PA. give her a line and inform her that you have emailed twice to no avail. leave a phone number too. I just send a 2 page, 750 word letter in reply, furiously explaining what happened.
  13. Update, I just received a reply from the CEO's personal assistant.. this is the best customer service Ive had from BT. Ever.
  14. I have also had massive problems with BT, they terminated my line as there was a remaining charge of £29!! a payment towards that had been made 3 days previously, and the money was happily taken for the complete next bill, up to december, then they told me I had to re order the line. this didn't work, and after about 4 hours trying to get through to someone, I finally got told the original line would be reconnected within 24 hours. Was this done? Was it heck!! so the whole line was terminated, and I have incurred charges to cancel the line! In short I paid for the service up to december, a balance of £167.88 and I'm being refunded a pathetic £41.67. What are my chances of getting the money back for the whole bill? I'm writing to queries as we speak and also to the CEO to see if anything can be done. Anymore advice? Cheers, Nathan
×
×
  • Create New...