Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tonyross I sent a cheque with mine got an e-mail back from david just saying theyd waive the charge they might do that with you |
Ah, how very nice of them. I bet they're hoping that you will decide to waive court proceedings too lol.
I have been almost in tears of frustration today. I've got a christening coming up on Sunday and have been saving up as much as I could to make sure that I could get a nice present for my Goddaughter and some new clothes etc. Today I looked online to see how much I'd got as I had planned to go shopping today. Was totally gutted to see that I had been charged 70 pounds for returned DD.
Firstly I couldn't understand what the heck they were for as I've not had any direct debits returned in the last 7 weeks. When I phoned my branch I was put through to 2 different people who were making very little sense at all. I was finally put through to someone else who explained that AOL had submitted 2 DD for payment but that there was not enough in my account to pay them. (Not surprising after LTSB had taken 175 pounds in charges 3 days prior.
After a lengthy conversation and me asking numerous times why I was being charged twice for a transaction that happened all in the same day and for the same company. I asked her specifically to explain to me the process of what happens when a direct debit is submitted for payment. She went on and on.
I then asked her what they have to do to return the DD. She said that they have to contact the company. I then said well it's done by computer isn't it... she hesitated (I was quite surprised at the silence) but then changed tact and went on about what the charges are for again. I said surely if they have to contact the company they would just put information re both transactions in the same envelope or in the same telephone conversation. She said that they don't telephone the companies and they don't write to them. How the heck then can they contact them and complete these transactions on the same day if it isn't computerised?
I should've insisted that she tell me what I wanted to know but I was getting more frustrated everytime she mentioned the fact that the charges were taken because there was insufficient funds in the account. I did lose it a little and said that it was because bleeding LTSB had taken all my money so how could there be funds available.
Anyway to cut it short, she said that she could return one of the payments of 35 pounds to me but not the other. I am a bit annoyed with myself that I hadn't got her to admit that it was all computerised.
Never mind though, it's only a matter of time before I get the information I need from them to start suing their bums.