Consumer Action Group envelope labels
You are part of a community of over 185,000 people. Let your bank know that you won't give in. Display one of our labels on your envelopes. Full description here
Sheet of 20 self-adhesive envelope labels £3.50 inc p&p
|
Do your Internet search here Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK
reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE
| | | | Do your Internet search here:-
|
Come and chat with us here (NB: External site NOT affiliated with CAG)
| | | CAG Announcements | |
Welcome Guest
Please register
Registration is free
There are no charges for using any of the facilities of this website.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ.
You will have to register before you can post.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You will also have to register to access our template letters and claims forms
registration is free
Are you being threatened over debts more than 6 years old? This may be unfair
See our new Unfair Trading Guide Bought an extended warranty? Not satisfied?
The warranty may be an example of unfair trading
See our new Unfair Trading Guide Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out Are you a victim of unfair trading? Check it out The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regs 2008 Have you been defaulted?
Would you like to clean up your credit file? Check it out | | | | | | | Lloyds Bank Meet other Lloyds Bank customers who have also been faced with excessive unfair bank charges. Exchange encouragement and information about getting your bank charges refunded | Welcome to The Consumer Action Group and The Bank Action Group
Before beginning to claim your bank charges be sure to read the FAQ by clicking the link above. Read it carefully and also read as much of the forum material as you can manage before you start claiming your bank charges refund.
You will have to register before you can post or view the materials which may assist you in reclaiming your penalty charges: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. Understand what you are doing and you will be able to Reclaim the Right more effectively.
Why don't you come and introduce yourself in the Welcome section at the top of the forum. Then have a look around the rest of it.
Do not post or start claiming until you have read the entire FAQ section and step by step guides and you have a good basic idea of what to do and of the layout of the forum.
Good luck claiming your bank charges. We strongly suggest that you register under a UserID and not your own name |  | |
17th May 2007, 23:41
|
#86 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer | Re: Lloyds victory in Birmingham - in perspective Monkey
Could you send me a copy too please ?
Send me a PM, and I;ll give you an email address to send them to.
ALSO EVERYONE
Is everyone aware of this thread?
It's a call for anyone who has any old copies of T&C's or contracts etc.
Look in you attics !
Look in your garages !
Look down the Sofa !
Look in the bottom of the cats litter tray !
Get in touch with your ex (maybe take them some flowers)... then sneak into their attics and see if you left stuff there !!
See if you can find anything that can be put into a library database for the benefit of others. We need your help folks! Re old T&Cs
Happy hunting !!
PS: Think about sticking the link into your signature also ?
PM
__________________ --------------------------- ARE YOU A BUSINESS CLAIMANT? CAG NOW HAVE A BUSINESS CLAIMS FORUM !
GO HERE ! BARCLAYS FLOUTING E.U. SANCTIONS IN ZIMBABWE Look at this thread. Got your old T&C's ? Visit this thread to help others. ----------------------------- All opinions and advice I offer are purely my own. just because something's in print doesn't mean its true.... just look at you Banks T&C's for example ! |
| |
18th May 2007, 11:25
|
#91 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Customer | Re: Lloyds victory in Birmingham - in perspective Quote: |
I believe that banking institutions are more danerous to our liberties than standing armies
| "THOMAS JEFFERSON" |
| |
18th May 2007, 11:39
|
#92 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Customer | Re: Lloyds victory in Birmingham - in perspective Quote: |
Educate and inform the mass of the people.... they are the preservation of our liberty
| THOMAS JEFFERSON
Basicly the banks can't win if we the people stand together(which we are), if each of us just spoke to two people today about these crimes and got them to do the same, then we the people, will succeed. |
| |
18th May 2007, 11:59
|
#94 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Customer | Re: Lloyds victory in Birmingham - in perspective I just wanted to say to you all, I won today
LloydsTSB have settled in full, including fees and interest on the last day that the court had given them to file documents, after they failed to file them by the first deadline. Money has gone in to my account and everything.
The reason I am posting this here is that they originally offered me £750 as a "goodwill gesture" ( I believe a standard offer amount), and because it was over the Christmas period my refusal of their offer was missed and the amount paid to me. They agreed I could still go on to try and claim the remainder though, (nice of them!?)
When I filed my case to MCOL they came back and submitted a defence as amount paid. I couldn't find anyone on this site they had done that too, and I was worried by that. I followed instructions from here to the letter (but without a bank contract in my bundle as I didn't realise I had to include this)
My point is that they still have paid, and my total amount was dated back to the time I requested my charges through Data Protection. This was in fact over 6 years ago from now as it's taken months to get to this point.
Don't give up guys, prepare everything carefully and stick to your guns. Maybe this guy who lost his case had a shoddy court bundle. Who knows?
They ARE still paying out though
PP xx |
| |
18th May 2007, 12:16
|
#96 (permalink)
| | Gold Account Customer | Re: Lloyds victory in Birmingham - in perspective There have been posts on here that imply that much of what has been said is ill informed & without merit. It’s true I think that many posters have understandably vented their anger over this judgement without giving much thought to the legal reasoning behind it. However it’s also true that as BF has already intimated that from a strict commercial sense that whilst there has apparently been no breach of contract in this case within the terms of the banks now amended T’s & C’s that it’s also true, as BF has also indicated, that it’s within the power of the court to look behind the purely commercial terms of the contract & take in to account the real effect on the private citizen. For goodness sake! I know, the banks know, most of the courts (except for one in Birmingham apparently)& my dog probably knows that these charges ARE penalties plain & simple used to subsidise 'Free' banking & that the banks have surreptitiously changed their T’s & C’s over time even removing them from their websites Why the court should ignore it’s overriding principal is unknown to me & leaves me a little nonplussed. It is after all dealing with matters, which affect millions of consumers, & not business to business where it could be more readily argued ‘caveat emptor’ I suspect that other courts, if forced to make a judgement, will take a different view & any bank that relies on this single judgement could, in the longer term, find themselves digging a hole because after being challenged in a higher court they could bring matters to a head as case law on this matter will become formed. I think now a strategy is needed to call the banks bluff & mine would be if I don’t have copy of the T’s & C’s previous to them being altered & am unable to obtain them because of the bank refusal to comply with my request I would ask the bank to confirm the change from/to thereby forcing the bank into admitting that they have changed their T’s& C’s to disguise their penalty charges as service charges. Failing which and provided I'm sure they were contained in my original T's & C's, as a punishment for not maintaining my account in a certain way, I would include such a statement to that effect in my POC & the banks would effectivley either have to admit it or commit perjury by claiming my statement was incorrect IMHO
Last edited by Pliny the Penuriosus; 18th May 2007 at 12:26.
|
| |
18th May 2007, 12:21
|
#97 (permalink)
| | Basic Account Customer | Re: Lloyds victory in Birmingham - in perspective hi folks been on the ltsb web site and in the charges section they still refer to the overdraft and unpaid DD fees as charges or fees not service costs.
hopefully will have some luck with uploading the old t&c document over the weekend.
for the moment the link for the charges page on the ltsb site is Lloyds TSB - Current account charges
hope thishelps you folks out there and good luck if you are at the court stage.
it is taking me ages due to ltsb's foot draging just sent the first polite letter requesting charges back think i better start gettig ready to see them in court |
| |
18th May 2007, 18:59
|
#98 (permalink)
| | Platinum Account Customer | |